Sentences with phrase «energy budget question»

If we had launched the Triana / DSCOVR climate satellite ten years ago, instead of mothballing it, we'd probably have robust answers to the energy budget question, and we could get the ocean heat change by calculating the (total energy change)- (atmospheric warming).

Not exact matches

Thursday Questions — Energy and climate change Business Statement - Leader of the House Motion — Reform of the court of justice of the EU Motion — European document relating to the EU draft budget Motion — European document relating to EU human rights strategy Adjournment — Arms trade treaty negotiations at the UN

In answer to a parliamentary question from Caroline Flint MP, Labour's Shadow Energy and Climate Change Secretary, the Government confirmed that the budget for this year's Warm Front scheme is # 100m.

The Democratic - controlled state Assembly on Monday introduced a budget bill that would prohibit the purchase of zero - emission credits mandated under the clean energy plan until leaders of the PSC and the New York Energy Research and Development Authority appear before a joint hearing of the Senate and Assembly to answer quesenergy plan until leaders of the PSC and the New York Energy Research and Development Authority appear before a joint hearing of the Senate and Assembly to answer quesEnergy Research and Development Authority appear before a joint hearing of the Senate and Assembly to answer questions.

We have responses to all eight questions from Reps. Henry Waxman (Committee on Energy and Commerce), Chris Van Hollen (Committee on the Budget), Ralph Hall (Committee on Science, Space and Technology), Timothy Bishop (Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment) and John Mica (Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure); Senators who responded were Jay Rockefeller (Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation), Tom Harkin (Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions) and Dianne Feinstein (Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development).

In response to a question about the likelihood of Congressional support for proposed budget increases for DOE science initiatives, Moniz offered remarks that were both pragmatic and optimistic: While noting that current spending caps might make a 20 % increase in clean - energy R&D unlikely, he said that there have been encouraging signs of greater bipartisan support for such research, and an appreciation for the DOE's strategy to work with private investors as well as international collaborators.

«The broader question is, should we spend some of our carbon budget to allow them to increase their incremental emissions if it translates into greater per capita energy use, both in the economy and really lifestyles that more mirror the developed world?»

The question now is whether the push to cut budgets and the rise of a more fiscally hawkish power base in congress will result in big decreases in energy research funding.

... instead, it will be necessary to engage with the critical questions presented by the evolving science contributions of hundreds of working scientists on the longterm vs. shorter term energy budget.

There is no more important question in climate science to debate: is the claim of the AGW Greenhouse Effect energy budget about the basic properties of electromagnetic energy from the Sun true or false?

They're the adults now who don't have any particular interest in science but «remember the science from school» and so unlikely to question whatever the AGW green agenda pushes, and even those in actual science fields where real knowledge of gas properties isn't relelevant, but what I find astonishing though, is how many in actual science fields who come together to discuss AGW continue to not question something as basic as the difference between heat and light claims in the AGW energy budget which is well known still in the real science world.

However, my task has been to use the K - T energy budget without questioning the data except the back radiation bit.

In his paper, «How Green Roofs Partition Water, Energy and Costs in Urban Energy - Air Conditioning Budgets,» Paul S. Mankiewicz PhD of the Gaia Institute illustrated the hidden relationship of water and energy when he asked the question, «Is it more cost - effective to utilize potable water for cooling than electrical air conditioning?&Energy and Costs in Urban Energy - Air Conditioning Budgets,» Paul S. Mankiewicz PhD of the Gaia Institute illustrated the hidden relationship of water and energy when he asked the question, «Is it more cost - effective to utilize potable water for cooling than electrical air conditioning?&Energy - Air Conditioning Budgets,» Paul S. Mankiewicz PhD of the Gaia Institute illustrated the hidden relationship of water and energy when he asked the question, «Is it more cost - effective to utilize potable water for cooling than electrical air conditioning?&energy when he asked the question, «Is it more cost - effective to utilize potable water for cooling than electrical air conditioning?»

But this raises the interesting question, is there something going on here w / the energy & radiation budget which is inconsistent with the modes of internal variability that leads to similar temporary cooling periods within the models.

To answer this question, we turn to the energy budget of the Hadley cell.

I am looking for a respectable way to get answer to your question published — how does the Earth maintain warmish Ice age / short interglacial cycle between repeatable limit temperatures, what is the heat energy budget and from what primary effect can this be created?

Climate scientists were faced with the question, why did this third approach (known as the «energy budget approach») yield somewhat lower results than others, and which estimate is right?

monty, please give a little time to study K&T's 1997 Annual Global Mean Energy Budget maybe you will understand my question.

Excuse one more dumb layman question: In the discussions it is mentioned that all energy that will effect the surface energy budget originates from the sun.

Heikki — regarding your first question, geothermal heat is not zero, but on a relative basis contributes only negligibly to the climate's energy budget, mainly because the thermal conductivity of the Earth's crust is very low.