Sentences with phrase «energy density does»

Work out how that change is modified by distance (radiative power varies with the fourth power of temperature and energy density does down with the second power of distance.

Arguments about energy density do not negate the net energy savings of solar energy.

Not exact matches

«The thing about a 350 kW charger is it doesn't actually make a ton a sense — unless you've got a monster battery pack or have like a crazy high C - rate, in which case your energy density is going to be poor.»

The answer to that turns out to be «definitely maybe»: If general relativity can be extended without modification into arbitrarily high energy densities, then yes — we can show that time doesn't extend indefinitely far backwards.

Packed with antioxidants that enhance your mood, health and energy level There are several different «grades» of matcha green tea powder Which are determined by the quality of the appearance processing method and ingredients used: The color of the tea The texture, quality and density The quality of the product The fineness of the powder How it was ground up Treatment prior to processing The Problem with Today's Green Superfood is you Don't know what's Inside.

We now know the shape of the universe (flat) and the average density of matter and energy (critical density), and yet we don't know what will happen.

Conversely, batteries have high energy density and low power density, which means they can last a long time, but don't deliver a large amount of energy quickly.

To do this, Skyllas - Kazacos has found an electrolyte that allows more vanadium to dissolve, thus doubling the energy storage density.

We don't know for sure, but of the, what I call, baryonic matter, which is 5 percent of the total mass energy density of the universe, one would guess about 90 or 95 percent of it, is in the form of ionized gas called plasma.

Among 6,489 people ages 8 to 20 years who participated in NHANES between 2005 and 2010 and had a bone density scan using dual - energy X-ray absorptiometry, or DXA, 159 subjects used stimulants and 6,330 did not.

They have larger muscles than the forelimbs, along with a greater density of mitochondria — the cellular components which convert nutrients into energy — suggesting they might be capable of doing quite a bit of work.

This paper reports that we've reached one of the highest energy densities stored per gram in a polymeric system, and how we did it.»

The findings from this study, done through DOE's Joint Center for Energy Storage Research (JCESR), could help scientists design a safe and stable metallic lithium anode and ultimately pave the way for the practical use of high - energy - density battery systems for electric vehicles and storing renewable eEnergy Storage Research (JCESR), could help scientists design a safe and stable metallic lithium anode and ultimately pave the way for the practical use of high - energy - density battery systems for electric vehicles and storing renewable eenergy - density battery systems for electric vehicles and storing renewable energyenergy.

«Because a plasma is inherently such a high energy density material, you don't destroy it.

The energy density of the work being done at LHC is phenomenal.

If a food doesn't grow in the environment where you dwell, the food energetics take is that it's not going to give you the right kind of energy that you need, regardless of the nutrient density.

A calorie doesn't tell you the nutrient density in a food — it only tells you how many units of energy are in it.

It's a very popular PDF that we sell for about, I think it's about $ 27 over at greenfieldfitnessystems.com, and in that program I tried to grab all the different research studies and all the different things you could steam with exercise, right, like fat loss, and VO2max and mitochondrial density, and one of the things that I do in there is I try to stimulate the phosphagenic energy system.

I often work with clients who list weight loss, bone density, energy, or knowing what to do as their top goals.

Vitamins and minerals also support the work being done by proteins to increase muscle and bone density, blood volume, to reduce fatigue, injury, and to increase one's energy.

Fruit and starch have similar energy density and so frugavore and starchavores don't need the huge small and large bowel, but they do need more than carnivores which eat very high calorie density food.

Alternatively, they don't adapt their approach as they progress (e.g. they don't transition to a more nutrient - dense lower energy density approach once their blood sugars have stabilised on a lower carb diet).

Do energy density and dietary fiber influence subsequent 5 - year weight changes in adult men and women?

Nevertheless, the associations of the intake of plain water with dietary fiber intake (positive), energy density of foods, and total and added sugars (inverse) do suggest different dietary selections in relation to plain water intake.

Let's do a little back - of - the - envelope calculation: Assuming that the heating unit has an efficiency close to 1.0 and that automotive diesel has an energy density of ~ 39 MJ / l which translates to ~ 10kWh / l.

The overall energy density of this formulation may be a bit lower due to the lower fat content, but these dogs work in short, very intense bursts, and consequently do not need consistently high calorie intake.

At first I didn't think I had the energy to accomplish it with the same detail and density.»

Ethanol doesn't have the energy density for jet flight and bio-diesel has a high gel point, which is bad news for planes that spend a good part of their time in the chilly 30,000 foot zone.

(Do the physics on how much energy it takes to compress air to a very high energy density, how much you lose in heating the air and how much of that heat is lost in the storage itself, how much you use when air rushes through a turbine like water, but unlike water running down hill whose speed / pressure stays the same, the compressed air loses force continually.

what exactly is it that determines the probability of an energy transition such as an electron emitting or absorbing a photon (besides densities and occupancies of states and incident photons, etc.)-- and how does refractive index affect this (it has to because the Planck function is proportional to n ^ 2 — has to be in order to satisfy 2nd law of thermo...)-- and does it make sense to use an k, E diagram when electrons are not actually propagating as plane waves — I mean, what is the wavevector when the waveform is not a plane wave; is k a function of space in atomic orbitals?

Corn grain ethanol is not a solution due to low net energy gain, GHG emissions, environmental degradation (e.g., water pollution and soil loss), and food supply issues) and cellulosic ethanol doesn't look favorable due to energy density issues and GHG emissions.

I was trying to estimate the mining footprints of solar and nuclear, and came up with some very tentative rough estimates that ore input for solar energy might have an energy density (per unit mass) ~ 5 to 80 times coal, while nuclear (convential US fuel cycle) may be ~ 20 times coal — on the solar side, this doesn't include some balance of system components, and on the nuclear side, it only includes the U, but on the solar side, the actual energy density could get much higher with recycling of the same material into multiple successive generations of solar energy devices, and on the nuclear side, breeder reactors.

If you don't compress it, the energy density of hydrogen fuel is quite small.

The energy storage density in these solutions is much less than fossil fuels and with what energy source do you manufacture the H2?

ie does a slightly lower density of air mean a slightly lower ground level temperature (temperature normally decreases with height at the lower air density), so that in reality adding CO2 and subtracting more O2 actually causes miniscule or trivial global COOLING, and the (unused) ability of the changed atmosphere to absorb radiation energy and transmit it to the rest of the air is overruled or limited by the ideal gas law?

The key drivers of energy efficiency appear to be less about density and more about walkability... You can't have walkability at suburban densities, but you don't need to be New York or Hong Kong either.

But note that given the use and occupancy of any individual dwelling is so variable, we do not propose that we base the internal heat gains on actual appliance energy use, but instead recognise that the make - up of household energy use and occupant density leads to a trend for internal heat gains to follow a non linear pattern with respect to dwelling size.

The thing is that we do not have, high energy density, long life, electrical storage devices.

In practice, except in the vicinity of strong storms, air moves nearly horizontally and does not mix across energy densities (isentropes) which increase upwards.

One has to look to the other macroscopic force which is conspicuously absent from the GHG assertions (can't call the «equations» because such don't exist), gravity, to explain the 3 %, in the case of Earth, and 125 %, in the case of Venus, greater surface than orbital temperatures (take those figures to the 4th power for equivalent energy densities) seen in all planetary atmospheres, and indeed all gravitational wells.

We use fossil fuels precisely because they have very high energy density — that is, they contain lots of heat energy in concentrated form; wind and solar do not.

Example: A car has an over all center of balance BUT all the individual materials do as well dependant on the density and mass as to how much energy is stored in motion.

As a related element in the energy density question, Bryce does not — in anyway — account for depletable vs renewable.

Also, your world calculations seem to be done using a constant energy density of 3.6 boe / t for coal.

Does not your thought experiment fail, because most of the molecules in the atmosphere are all at the same heat (kinetic energy), while the difference in temperature with altitude (on a thermometer) is simply an effect of the number of molecules you meet (pressure and density).

The solution technically doesn't have to be scale invariant there but the density of the gas and vertical distribution of energies is, in the ergodic sense or for very large areas $ A$.

So it's all gases at greatest density will be doing the same thing around the planet at the same time (*) and as these change with differences in density in the play between gravity and pressure and kinetic and potential from greatest near the surface to more rarified, less dense and absent any kinetic to write home about the higher one goes, then, energy conservation intact, the hotter will rise and cool because losing kinetic energy means losing temperature, thus cooling they which began with the closest in density and kinetic energy as a sort of band of brothers near the surface will rise and cool at the same time whereupon they'll all come down together colder but wiser that great heights don't make for more comfort and giving up their heat will sink displacing the hotter now in their place when they first went travelling.

(In case someone does not see why internal energy is proportional to density it is because if stuff has energy, and you have more of the same kind of energetic stuff, you must have more energy.)

I did not read that «the idea that gravity by itself can create a permanent gradient of temperature in an atmosphere» other then the idea that atmospheric density by itself creates greater heat capacity, thus a longer residence time for energy to saturate while insolation continues unabated.

It comprises a number for the amount of energy required for the necessary work done (in Joules) to lift 1 kg of mass in a gas to a height at which it can become 1 degree kelvin cooler due to the decrease in density with height.