Sentences with phrase «energy emitted»

With this, AGW says that the energy emitted by the Sun is attenuated through the space between the Earth and the Sun from 9.66 x 10 ^ 25 W to 342 W / m ^ 2, on the very top of the Earth's atmosphere.

That's the solar energy emitted by the Sun in direction to the Earth.

It may well «peak» in the Visible by energy states, but the Visible as % of the total energy emitted is relatively tiny compared with the total amount of energy emitted.

In that 24hour period recorded by SURFRAD a 1m ^ 2 section of ground has: Total Solar energy absorbed: 24.0 MJ Total energy Emitted: 38.9 MJ

Given that the energy of the Sun is not concentrated by a gigantic magnifier exclusively on the Earth, it is not the whole energy emitted from 1/4 of the surface area of the Sun, but only a portion of those emissions; otherwise, the Earth would be toasted in one second.

And continues: «Your result is in contradiction to satellital observations and measurements because you say that the power received by the Earth is Q = 3.84 * 10 ^ 26 W, the same amount of the energy emitted by the whole solar sphere, i.e. p = 3.84 * 10 ^ 26 W. It's a fantasy of you.»

To say that the planet Earth absorbs the solar energy as if it would be incoming from all directions with the same intensity is not correct, and it is not correct either to think that the whole load of solar energy emitted in all possible directions, as a sphere, will be intercepted by the Earth.

However, the problem is that you are calculating the whole load of energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun and are directing it towards the Earth.

Nasif «Here the things start incorrect... There is no one book that introduces the energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun»

What you are doing is to make the whole surface area of the sphere (the Earth) absorbs a portion of the energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun.

In addition of this mistake of you, you are calculating the whole load of energy emitted by the whole solar surface area intercepted by the whole surface area of the outer sphere, not the load of energy intercepted by the Earth.

You calculate the energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun as if it was directed to the Earth.

It seems that most of the thermal energy emitted by Earth and its inhabitants gets a free pass through the Pass - Through Window.

There is no one book that introduces the energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun.

Nevertheless, what you are calculating is the energy emitted by the whole surface area of the Sun towards the whole surface area of the outer sphere.

To be clear this is your intent here is your quote: «In your case, you're introducing false values, as for example the energy emitted by the Sun towards the Earth, that you assigned as if the whole load of energy emitted by the solar sphere were directed towards the Earth.»

Stefan - Boltzmann's Law States that the total energy emitted by a black body, integrated over all wavelengths, is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature (Temperature in Kelvins).

Take the water vapor alone and see what's the power of the energy emitted by the water vapor alone.

In this condition, energy emitted from body A and absorbed by body B = energy emitted from body B and absorbed by body A.

«when the total amount of energy emitted by the surface, considering the thermals and the latent heat, is 288 W / m ^ 2.»

Physically, what is the downward energy emitted by the atmosphere minus the upward energy emitted by the atmosphere?

The energy emitted by the atmosphere = ED + EU, where EU is the energy radiated from the top of the atmosphere.

Therefore, since the energy emitted toward the surface equals what is received, and since there is no fog, scattering makes more sense.

For that point on the surface of the earth to stop heating up (equilibrium) the radiative energy emitted by that point in a 24 hour period must therefore exceed the radiative energy it absorbed from the sun in that 24 hour period.

Energy emitted by the earth's surface equals energy it absorbed from direct sunlight plus energy it absorbed from the atmosphere (also emitting light, e.g. infrared).

On the other hand, based on measurements (for example the Perry curves in this posting as well as others in his book), I am quite certain that a substantial portion of the LWIR energy emitted from the Surface ultimately, after a number of absorption and re-emission transactions, does make its way back down and that some of that downwelling LWIR is due to layers above the initial, first - generation extinction level.

By capturing thermal radiation (heat energy emitted from the earth's surface components and re radiating it in all directions — part of the same process that is accepted (somewhat like the «earth revolves around the sun accepted») to keep the planet much warmer than it would otherwise be in the absence of any of these molecules — it actually «cools.»

I have previously mentioned something similar, ie., not disputing that all objects above absolute zero radiate but that does not automaticlly mean that radiative energy emitted by a colder object is actually absorbed by the warmer object.

The energy emitted in the «back to Earth» direction lowers the heat transfer that is occurring in the «away from Earth» direction.

have you figured out accounted for that 330W / m2 Energy emitted downward yet?

(That would be an impossible situation unless the energy emitted at the top layer was replenished from outside, or if there was a perfect IR mirror out there).

temperature is a function of energy but certainly not = energy Temperature is a measure of the average internal kinetic energy of matter and also a [non-linear] measure of the radiant energy emitted by a body.

The ability of the atmosphere to capture and recycle energy emitted by the Earth surface is the defining characteristic of the greenhouse effect.

You can say something about energy emitted... but that is not the same statement as energy contained.

The heat radiated from the surface is still 19,345 W, energy emitted by Venus still has to equal energy absorbed by Venus, and as a result Venus» atmosphere still has to be massively insulating.

Less energy emitted directly into space from the surface and more emission in the atmosphere in all directions as seen by specialist instrumentation.

And this is perfectly fine: all of the energy emitted by the earth ends up at the first shell.

All of the energy emitted by the inner surface of his first shell ends up at the earth.

looking at another analogy, the energy emitted by a 100 watt incandescent lightbulb, that emits heat and light across a wide range of frequencies, but lets just use heat and say that three feet from the bulb, it is IR, and we were to put a globe of aluminium foil around it to prevent convection, and in another simultaneous experiment we were to line the foil at the same distance with black paper or another blackbody material.

Since the steel shell has a larger radius, it's surface area is larger than that of the earth, and so for the TOTAL ENERGY emitted to remain constant, as required by the First Law, the shell must radiate less W / m2 than did the earth, so that when multiplied by the shell's larger surface area, the total energy emitted still comes out the same.

Similarly, it is is impossible to measure the total energy emitted by the Earth.

By using a receiver element which is consistent in mass, area, and heat capacity you would be looking at energy received vs energy emitted / conducted in a more direct and consistent manner.

Thus, long - term variations of TSI (with account for their direct and secondary, based on feedback effects, influence) are the main fundamental cause of climate changes since variations of the Earth climate is mainly determined by a long - term imbalance between the energy of solar radiation entering the upper layers of the Earth's atmosphere and the total energy emitted from the Earth back to space.»

It assumes that some energy is reflected and that energy absorbed equals energy emitted.

Is this, 64w / m ^ 2, perhaps a measure of that portion of the blackbody radiation energy emitted from the earth («earthshine») that is blocked by the saturated H2O absorption spectrum as opposed to the relative ability of any given parcel of air to capture or export heat via the H2O photon radiation path?

Previous sections explained that calculations of entropy «removed» (negative entropy) are based on energy emitted divided by the temperature of the source.

Yes, it seems this 64 W / m ^ 2 is the flux of thermal energy emitted by the surface, which was taken from Trenberth's scheme on Earth's energy budget and after modified ad arbitrium by many people.

The energy in the sun's spectrum between 780 to 2500nm is about 1/2 of the known energy emitted from the Sun.

A normal 100 watt incandescence light would more energy emitted in 3 to 8um as compared to 8 to 30um.

Let us remember the importance of fluid flow from less infrared transparent regions (the lower troposphere) to more infrared transparent regions (the upper troposphere) in determining the amount of energy emitted out of the earth system.