Sentences with phrase «energy jobs instead»
The president was trying to pass an economic recovery bill that included $ 90 billion in green projects — the groups should talk about clean energy jobs instead.
https://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/ Not exact matches
Going back and forth with authors in response to questions about why I'm reaching out to one particular reporter instead of another at, say, the Boston Globe, or being given to - do lists and asked to account for each item takes time and energy away from doing my job and doing it well.
If you provide lots of metal stimulation like a structured walk or a job or activity for learning instead of just letting it run free (which causes excitement) this will burn energy.
So let's consider an average few days of in - game time; To get some money to buy equipment for working out in the garage instead of paying the gym entry fee you opt to spend a long time laboring away at a hard job that saps your overall happiness and energy.
Magda Stoczkiewicz, continued: «Under the guise of promoting jobs, growth and energy security, the U.S. and EU leaders are pushing a corporate - driven agenda of dirty energy and deregulation — instead of genuine solutions like energy efficiency and community - owned renewables.»
We must ensure that our energy policies generate revenues and create jobs — instead of requiring constant taxpayer subsidies and destroying two to four traditional jobs for every «green» job that government «creates.»
We want to ask you instead to begin fully embracing a just energy policy for all Virginians that reduces total climate pollution while investing in clean - energy jobs and real investments to protect our people and the military from accelerating sea - level rise and other impacts of global warming.
It provides important opportunities for the U.S. to lead on renewable energy technology and jobs, and pulling out could have us instead falling behind other countries, like China.
Now, the jobs and revenue that were encouraged by our RE ITC will start to move instead to states that have policies which promote installing clean energy technologies, such as GSHPs, to efficiently meet heating and cooling demands.
That happens, for instance, when building a waste - to - energy plant instead of a coal station not only cuts future emissions but also brings jobs to a community while protecting local water and biodiversity.
short answer A bad idea, since (i) they produce CO2 (partly responsible for the rise in global warming), (ii) there is a limited amount of fossil fuel from which we make valuable materials such as lubricants and plastics, (iii) fossil fuel resources are finite, so burning them means we are consuming a resource we can never replace, and (iv) we can actually build new industries and create many new jobs developing renewable sources of energy instead of burning fossil fuels.
Instead, they import most of their natural gas from states like Pennsylvania, where hydraulic fracturing in the Marcellus shale has brought jobs, prosperity, and lower energy bills — New York's electric bills are 36 percent higher than neighboring Pennsylvania's.
Our opportunity here isn't only about protecting the ocean waters of America, marine life, a favorite surf break, jobs or a given beach community; it's about demanding that our government utilize the best available science and data and listen to the massive outpouring of public opposition to destructive offshore oil and gas development, to shift the tides of energy development instead away from fossil fuels and toward renewables; it's about holding our President and federal agencies accountable for decisions they make about the management of the ocean; it's about protecting the ocean and every coastline from the atrocity and injustice of offshore drilling and exploration; it's about protecting clean water, air and beaches now and for the future; it's about protecting one another, and the Earth.
Instead, they might consider embracing the all - of - the - above approach to energy suggested by the Verdolini team's research, as well as real climate progress that's occurring without impacting jobs, the economy, energy security or consumer affordability.
He talked very little about climate, tending instead to talk about green jobs and energy security, and in the process left the door open for climate deniers to have a field day.»
This analysis also demonstrates that improving the energy efficiency provisions in ACES by including a stand - alone energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACES Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency provisions in ACES by including a stand - alone energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACES Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACES Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalEnergy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the original bill.
Which is why, in a better world, some shrewd politician would amp up the current energy bill (instead of paring it down), and include green jobs provisions to address both concerns.
On March 26, 2009 The White House and a whole bunch of environmental group leaders decided to stop talking about climate change and push the agenda by talking instead about national security, green jobs, clean energy economic growth, clean energy future, diversification of energy, health, future generations...
ACEEE's analysis of this legislation demonstrates that improving the energy efficiency provisions in ACESA by including a stand - alone energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACESA Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency provisions in ACESA by including a stand - alone energy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACESA Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency resource standard (EERS) requiring 10 % cumulative savings by 2020 (instead of the ACESA Combined Efficiency and Renewable Electricity Standard, or CERES), directing one - third of electric local distribution company allowances to energy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalenergy efficiency, and sustaining State Energy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the originalEnergy and Environmental Development funding at 9.5 % of allowance revenue through 2030 provides significant additional consumer savings and carbon reductions and creates more jobs than the original bill.
Among the concerns bubbling to the surface in the last week or so are: (1) Renewables might not be doing such a great job of replacing fossil fuel capacity after all, (2) Energy storage might be fomenting yet another carbon emissions problem instead of solving one, and (3) Renewables might be making electricity rates go up, not down.
, writing to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton late last year, pitted pipeline construction against clean energy, asserting that «proponents of this pipeline would be wiser to invest instead in job - creating clean energy projects, like renewable power, energy efficiency or advanced vehicles and fuels.»
Instead of letting an uninspiring job sour your overall attitude to life, use the mental energy you retain by not being challenged at work to build a more satisfying personal and community life.
Instead, you watch in horror as your attitude, your energy and possibly your work ethic crumbles under the pressure of working a job that is a poor fit for you.
Instead, direct your energy onto writing a follow - up email, work on your interview technique for next time, and put all of that positive energy back in to your job search.
Instead, put your energy into presenting the best possible resume for jobs you have the qualifications and experience for.
Instead, I'd put as much energy as you can into finding another job as quickly as possible.
I recommend that my clients submit no more 3 - 4 jobs online weekly and instead focus their energies on more powerful job search strategies that get better results.
For example, instead of saying, «I am hoping to obtain a new job that...,» write, «Seeking a position...» Starting your objective with an action verb such as «seeking» conveys the energy and focus hiring managers want, according to Palladian Career Resources.