Sentences with phrase «energy reaches the object»

Not exact matches

It is a fundamental principle of nature that objects will move until they reach a state of minimal energy, or grounding.

And even if you don't have dark energy, there are regions of the universe that are moving away from us now faster than the speed of light and what happens when that's the case is they carry objects with them like a surfer on a wave and the light from those objects can not reach [us] so eventually the universe will disappear [from] before our eyes in that sense.

The environment design is faithful to the subject matter as it includes iconic environments from Star Wars films such as the remote desert planet of Jakku and the ice planet of Starkiller Base containing a deadly energy weapon within the core of the planet, while a new feature which generally sets environments apart from this game in comparison to other LEGO games is the introduction of multi-build paths that effectively allows players to build an object to complete a new objective or reach a new area, dismantle it, then re-build it as an alternative object in order to complete another new objective or reach another new area.

-LSB-...]... To allow ourselves to be inhabited by what left our field, perhaps our visual field; around us, in the hole inside us, we learn the fullness of other dimensions of existence...... The spaces left empty are the place of the most intense energy, emanations, auras, tensions, thoughts and the fascinations of the human presence... -LSB-...] The drawn objects serve as a backdrop for creating states of mind, from which the attempt at concentration, at falling inside, at finding the rhythm, the exhaustion through rhythm and the reaching of a conclusion which is a static stage before a new beginning.»

Except for: — Your claims that bidirectional EM violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics; — Your sentient detector that received no energy from the object it is pointed at but radiates energy according to the temperature it is point at allowing you to see beyond the edge of the observable universe (Still awaiting the Nobel prize for that one no doubt); — Your perfectly radiating blackbody that does not radiate according to its temperature; — Your claims EM energy interferes which prevents energy from a colder body reaching a warmer one — a concept which would mean it would be impossible to see your reflection in a mirror.

The difference is the sun is transferring energy to the objects that it reaches.

Surely you agree that, in terms of temperature, until they reach an equilibrium temperature, since the net energy flow is from the warmer to the cooler, the cooler object only warms and the warmer object only cools.

The warm object doesn't stop the cold object from radiating so energy from the cold object is indeed reaching the warm object just as energy from the warm object reaches the colder one.

I am not arguing against what you say, just trying to understand the mechanism... I have always known an object cools more slowly and reaches a higher equilibrium temperature in a warm surroundings than a cold one, but had considered that an effect of gradient, not as you say a result of energy input from the colder surroundings.

This would of course pose a problem because the energy transfer would never end and we would have created a perpetual motion machine, not to mention a really hot one: — RRB - In other words you would never reach energy and temperature equilibrium between the two objects, which is obviously contrary to reality.

If a second blackbody object (no internal thermal energy source but with thermal conduction properties such that independent of the direction of incident radiation on the second object, the second object's surface temperature will be everywhere the same) is placed next to but NOT touching the original object, when the two - object system reaches steady state (i.e., for each object, the rate of energy leaving the object will equal the rate of energy entering the object), the surface temperature of the original object in the presence of the second object will be higher than it was in the absence of the second object.