Sentences with phrase «energy security got»

What has sustainability and energy security got to do with this?

Not exact matches

No new grandiose neologism (the favourite of late is «North American energy security,» which presumably aims to get Americans to think about the energy market as the missing piece in the larger economic integration process underpinned by NAFTA).

So, «national interest,» according to the NEB, does not include energy security, net employment benefits, environment, climate, GDP, or anything other than getting the pipeline approved.

It seems that is largely the case here, albeit as a weapon for supporting pipelines — if you can promise someone that the pipeline will enhance energy security, they are more likely to smile and nod than to ask you to define it, so you can get away with it as a soundbite.

Winston Churchill famously warned at the dawn of the petroleum age that the best way for a country to protect its energy security was to avoid getting hooked on too few suppliers.

Mr. Iddrisu indicated that the Minister of Energy, Boakye Agyarko «in a most bizarre and shameful twist,... addressed a press conference on July 4, 2017, claiming that even before his own committee would get to work, the BNI and National Security have exonerated the BOST Managing Director, Mr Alfred Obeng Boateng, and absolved him of all wrongdoing.»

Harnessing the UK's massive green energy resource and getting tough on energy waste will create new jobs and business opportunities, increase energy security and help make this country a world leader in tackling climate change.

«Whilst we are getting on with the pensions proposals for the future of the country, whilst we are producing the energy proposal that guarantees energy security and climate change issues, whilst we are managing a huge investment in our schools as a result of the strong economy the chancellor has produced, whilst we're investing in the NHS - we've been doing all that what exactly has he been doing?»

Ultimately, getting energy policy right translates into environmental and national security improvements as well as economic development.

Once we become aware of that, we'll realize that not only will we be getting energy security, we'll be getting job security as well, on a global basis.

So I think the innovation agenda — pursuing climate - risk mitigation, pursuing energy security (not just for us but for everyone), satisfying our social responsibilities to help two billion people get some semblance of appropriate energy services — that's all wrapped up in this innovation agenda.

We get that improving energy and water efficiency at America's airports is one essential way for us to protect our health, environment, economy, and national security.

The all - in - one device allows you to sync schedules, check movie times, listen to music, watch videos, get weather updates, and even monitor energy usage and home security, all from a single, easy - to - use device.»

If we can ever get around to stop destabilizing large parts of this planet, then they won't seem so «threatening» — then, we can shrink the military back from the $ 600 billion monstrosity that it is now (as poster # 4 rightly said) and focus on human security at home and abroad: adequate shelter, food, health, education, and an energy system that won't fry the only livable planet we have.

As we get closer and closer to the next election, it's becoming increasingly clear that the majority of the voting public is extremely concerned about energy security and climate change.

(Maybe we need to go into the business of making a temperature controlled photo - reactive glass shingle / tile and getting the government to add that to the Climate and Energy Security Bill regarding building code standards...?)

When it's over and we look back and see where it got us, will we be able to say it brought us energy security, or enabled us to prepare for the time when the boom will be over?

How can we get enough plug - in cars on the road quickly enough to have an impact on climate change and energy security — ideally in the next decade?

While the Democratic leadership of the waning 111th Congress failed to get legislation passed into law to address climate change, the House global warming committee, led by Rep. Ed Markey (D - MA), convened dozens of important hearings and briefings featuring top climate scientists and national security experts to educate Congress and the public about the need for swift action to secure America's energy independence, create clean energy jobs and mitigate climate change emissions.

First, my solar policy paper, Getting out of the Shade: Solar Energy as National Security Energy, which we summarized before in a previous post, has now been published in three parts on China Dialogue.

Those same incremental technology improvements we get through scaling up / learning current clean tech won't get us near zero emission reductions (or energy security) in the same time either.

The Beijinger article provides a good background to the second article, «Getting Out of the Shade: Solar Energy as a National Security Strategy,» which I penned for China Security journal.  In this piece, I lament the fact that China's solar photovoltaics (PV) industry has been export oriented, but argue that there is no time better than now to develop its domestic solar market because of a combination of increased solar module and polysilicon supply and decreased overseas demand is driving costs down to record lows. I don't want to Read the full story

The clock is ticking on energy security and global warming and the world can't wait to get started.

He «subscribes» to me through google alerts, so if I post an article on energy, he'll get an email and read my article — that's one of the reasons I wrote «Peak Oil and the Preservation of Knowledge», «Peak Soil: Why Cellulosic and other Biofuels are Not Sustainable and a Threat to America's National Security», «The Hydrogen Economy — Energy and Economic Black Hole»,energy, he'll get an email and read my article — that's one of the reasons I wrote «Peak Oil and the Preservation of Knowledge», «Peak Soil: Why Cellulosic and other Biofuels are Not Sustainable and a Threat to America's National Security», «The Hydrogen Economy — Energy and Economic Black Hole»,Energy and Economic Black Hole», etc..

This implies that policy makers should take to heart the WEO's main conclusion regarding climate change policies: We need to take action that goes much beyond current policies to get anywhere near a safe pathway with respect to energy security and climate change.

So, just how do we get to energy security - to the point where, by 2030, 92 percent of America's liquid fuel needs is supplied by a combination of U.S. and Canadian sources?

For a country with such poor food security (40 % self sufficient) and nearly totally dependent on energy imports, you got ta wonder if any number of green sky sky scrapers are much more than window dressing the approaching economic / energetic / ecological melt down we all face....

The Charlottesville Daily Progress broke the story: Letters Urged Protection of Minorities From Higher Electricity Costs Pointing out that «our state gets 56 % of its electricity from coal,» the letter urged Perriello to vote against the American Clean Energy & Security Act in order to «protect minorities and other consumers in your district from higher electricity bills.»

You would be much better off trying to find common ground on policy ideas via co-benefits (on air pollution, energy security, public health water resources etc), than trying to get involved in irrelevant scientific «controversies».

While there's passion associated with this issue, emotion can get in the way of sound policy — which is what we need for America's energy and national security.

From our new research analysis, «Scrap or Retrofit Clunkers,» here are two charts showing why we need to convert existing vehicles to plug in to get near - term energy security and CO2 benefits.

But while hawking energy drinks or Lululemon apparel without disclosing it might get you a slap on the wrist and a fine from the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), once you move into securities and investments, you're risking jail time.

TweetSharebar TweetShareholding model Shareholding model, converting personal energy into equity Chapter 9 p. 9 A colleague of mine said that the fact that you can get shares in a company compensates for the lack of job security.

Global About Blog Investorideas is a place for investors to get breaking stock news, podcasts, videos, company profiles, articles and stock research for investing in tech, bitcoin and blockchain, biotech, mining, energy, renewable energy, water stocks, marijuana and hemp stocks, food and beverage including wine, defense and security, Latin America, sports, entertainment, luxury brands, luxury real estate and gaming Frequency about 84 posts per week.

High energy Security specialist with excellent interpersonal skills th e ability to motivate peole and see tha the job gets done and done right.

Top it off with a 4 zone entertainment system, storm shelter, 4 car garage, built - ins throughout, laundry chute, 9 camera security system, energy efficiency features, and you've got one great home to call your own!