(China and the UK are both parties to the New York Convention, which requires courts of contracting states to recognise and
enforce arbitration awards made in other contracting states.)
Not exact matches
For instance, in a 1968 case, a Swiss court refused to issue an enforcement order on the grounds that the arbitral tribunal had not complied with the agreement of the parties that «all disputes should be settled in one and the same arbitral proceedings» and instead conducted the
arbitration in two stages.904 In a 2001 case, the Italian Supreme Court
enforced a first
award but not a second
award made with respect to the same dispute.
A non-domestic
award is further one where the
award is
made in the
enforcing state under the laws of another state or because the
arbitration contains a foreign element.
Accordingly, the procedure for
enforcing or setting aside an international
arbitration award made in Myanmar is uncertain.
Marion Boyd's argument is reflected in Omar's comments: if one does not hold out the possibility of
enforcing a family arbitral
award made under Islamic law, at least on some grounds (and she set out a number of conditions about procedural and substantive fairness), then those who go to
arbitration under that law anyway have no protection in civil law, and the arbitrator has no incentive to conform to our general notions of fairness.
(a) The Defendant (the «KRG») applied on 3 July 2017 to set aside the Order of this Court
made ex parte on 29 May 2017 by which it recognised and, subject to its terms,
enforced two
arbitration awards made in London under the auspices of the LCIA and permitted alternative service of the order
made and other documents on the KRG's London solicitors who had acted for them in the
arbitration.
Each level of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform for the judicial review of
arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and data analysis of cases regarding applications to confirm the validity of an arbitation agreement, cases regarding applications to cancel or
enforce arbitration awards of our domestic
arbitration institutions, applications to recognize and
enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region
arbitration awards, cases regarding applications to recognize and
enforce foreign arbitral
awards, and cases relating to the judicial review of
arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and others relating to the confirmation of the validity of an
arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee of the correct application of law and of a unified yardstick for judicial decision -
making.
In cases in which a party applies to have the validity of an
arbitration agreement recognized, cases in which application is
made to cancel a domestic
arbitration commission's
award, cases in which application is
made to recognize (认可) and
enforce a Hong Kong SAR or Macau SAR
arbitration award, recognize (认可) and
enforce a Taiwan area
arbitration award, application is
made to recognize (承认) and
enforce a foreign arbitral
award, shall be handled by the specialized trial divisions of each level of court.
For domestic
arbitrations, section 52 (3) of the Ontario Arbitration Act, 1991 provides that an application to
enforce the
award must be
made within two years of the date that the applicant receives the
award.
The respondent by their letter dated 27th November 2012 took a deliberate and conscious decision not to participate any further in the
arbitration making their stand clear that they would not file any witness statements, will not attend the hearing and would challenge any attempt to
enforce the arbitral
award in India.