Not exact matches
I share the view expressed by objective and reasonable members of the public that because the government was the 1st defendant / respondent against whom the Supreme Court made declarations of unconstitutional conduct in paying the
judgment debt to Alfred Agbesi Woyome, the government has been pretending for purely political reasons at each turn to take steps to
enforce the
judgment and orders of the court
only to deliberately abort them.
She said while JCOPE is a «step in the right direction,» it also is problematic because JCOPE can
only make recommendations to the Legislature, leaving it to senators and Assembly members to decide whether to
enforce a
judgment against a colleague.
Creditors use
judgments (a court's determination that you owe a debt) to
enforce past - due debts, but if you don't own much, a
judgment won't help a creditor, since they can
only come after non-exempt assets.
A recent unreported decision (ENRC NV v Zamin Ferrous Limited [2015] JRC 217) has demonstrated the Jersey Royal Court's willingness to make disclosure orders not
only to police post-
judgment freezing orders but also to ensure that
judgment creditors have all the information they need to
enforce their
judgments worldwide.
This ruling is not thermonuclear on its own, but in its aftermath, we will not
only see a lot of wrangling over a
judgment as a matter of law to overrule the jury and over injunctive relief but there will also be, even more importantly, a push by Apple to
enforce many more design patents and utility (hardware and software) patents against Samsung.
Although the right to sue on the debt may
only last two years, the right to
enforce a court
judgment lasts for ten years.
Its main, if not
only, controversial feature is that it does not allow the
enforcing court to review the jurisdiction of the court giving the
judgment.
It was thought that it was contrary to this spirit of «full faith and credit» (in Morguard's words, sort of) and administrative simplicity to allow defendants to wait in the bushes while the original court held a trial — even in default of appearance — and then attack jurisdiction
only when the
judgment came to be
enforced in a place where the defendant had assets.
I believe Mr. Semenoff is wrong in saying that a Canadian provincial court would
enforce only U.K. civil
judgments (because of the Canada - UK Reciprocal Enforcement Convention from the 1980s, legislated into effect in all the common - law provinces.)
It did so despite the fact that the U.K. court's order did not meet the traditional requirement that
only a final
judgment of a foreign court for the payment of a definite sum of money will be
enforced in Canada.
[1] It did so despite the fact that the U.K. court's order did not meet the traditional requirement that
only a final
judgment of a foreign court for the payment of a definite sum of money will be
enforced in Canada.
[9]
Judgments or orders given in representative actions are normally binding on all persons represented in the claim, but may
only be
enforced by or against non-parties with the court's permission.
Only final
judgments for payment of a definite sum of money (save for taxes, fines or penalties) can be
enforced under common law.
However, in the United Kingdom, such a
judgment shall be
enforced in England and Wales, in Scotland or in Northern Ireland
only when, on the application of any interested party, it has been registered for enforcement in that part of the United Kingdom.
The Justice referred to City of Mecca (1879), 5 P D 28 where Sir Robert Phillimore held that the English Court of Admiralty could and ought to
enforce an in rem
judgment of a Foreign Admiralty Court, on the grounds of international comity (reversed on appeal not on a point of law, but because, like the subject case, the foreign
judgment was in personam
only.)
This suggests that the Myanmar courts would
only enforce monetary
judgments, at least from a procedural perspective, and that
judgments in rem, such as relating to injunctions, including foreign asset freezing orders and specific performance, would not be
enforced.
(3) A
judgment shall be recognised
only if it has effect in the State of origin, and shall be
enforced only if it is enforceable in the State of origin.
The motions judge held the McCutcheon
judgment should
only be
enforced against The Cash Store with respect to payday loans.
A State may declare that its courts may refuse to recognise or
enforce a
judgment given by a court of another Contracting State if the parties were resident in the requested State, and the relationship of the parties and all other elements relevant to the dispute, other than the location of the chosen court, were connected
only with the requested State.
Recognition or enforcement of a severable part of a
judgment shall be granted where recognition or enforcement of that part is applied for, or
only part of the
judgment is capable of being recognised or
enforced under this Convention.
Perhaps not wanting to seem oppressive, it
only seeks to
enforce its US
judgment to that extent that if it can not succeed on its claim to
enforce its US copyrights directly in the English courts
The case focuses on the test for jurisdiction of a Canadian court to
enforce a foreign
judgment when the
only connection to the province is the presence of a wholly - owned subsidiary of the foreign parent corporate defendant.
But, when not merged in the divorce
judgment, the property settlement agreement may
only be
enforced by resort to the usual contract remedies and not as part of the divorce
judgment.»