Sentences with phrase «enforcement of judgments between»

According to them, the Bank's aim was to enforce the judgment in the DIFC and then take it for execution in the Dubai Courts, relying on the reciprocal enforcement mechanisms available under Article 7 of the Judicial Authority Law (these provide for the mutual enforcement of judgments between the DIFC Courts and the Dubai Courts).

Not exact matches

This judgment brings the BVI back into line with many other countries which make no automatic distinction between the location of the judgment, but rather leave that to be considered in the Judge's discretion on the enforcement application itself.

«In light of the economically significant relationship between Chevron and Chevron Canada, and given that Chevron Canada maintains a non-transitory place of business in Ontario, an Ontario court has jurisdiction to adjudicate a recognition and enforcement action against Chevron Canada's indirect corporate parent that also names Chevron Canada as a defendant and seeks the seizure of the shares and assets of Chevron Canada to satisfy a judgment against the corporate parent.»

The common law also requires the enforcement of a foreign civil judgment where there is a real and substantial connection between the subject matter of the litigation and the foreign court.

The Supreme Court of Canada has recently stated in Chevron Corp. v. Yaiguaje that a party seeking enforcement of a judgment in Ontario does not have to show a real and substantial connection between Ontario and the foreign judgment debtor.

The Supreme Court's decision is the latest in a series of important appellate judgments arising out of the long - running dispute concerning the enforcement of a Nigerian arbitral award between NNPC, the Nigerian state - owned oil company, and IPCO.

From laws and regulations to international conventions and bilateral treaties that govern the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Romania, competent courts and distinction between recognition and enforcement, as well as conditions for recognition and enforcement, opposition and related procedures and timeframes, the guide provides a complete picture and constitutes a very useful material for any interested party.

If proceedings are ongoing in an English court between the parties at the time when one of the parties seeks recognition or enforcement of a foreign judgment on the same issue (s), the English court is likely to stay the English proceedings until the judgment creditor's claim for recognition and enforcement has been determined.

2.9 What is your court's approach to recognition and enforcement of a foreign judgment when there is: (a) a conflicting local judgment between the parties relating to the same issue; or (b) local proceedings pending between the parties?

Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and DIFC Courts awards Dubai Courts jurisdiction in «conduit» cases: The Judicial Tribunal for the Dubai Courts and the DIFC Courts, established in 2016 to rule on conflicts of jurisdiction and conflicts of judgments between the two courts, has issued two recent decisions in cases where claimants obtained an order from the DIFC Courts recognising arbitral awards made outside the DIFC, where there was no connection with the DIFC, and where the order recognising the award was referred for enforcement to the Dubai courts for enforcement against assets located there.

A groundbreaking and long awaited Memorandum of Understanding has now been signed between the Abu Dhabi Global Market (ADGM) Courts and the Abu Dhabi Judicial Department, allowing for the direct enforcement of ADGM Courts judgments and arbitral awards into onshore Abu Dhabi

Authentic instruments and agreements between parties that are enforceable in one Member State should be treated as equivalent to «judgments» for the purpose of the application of the rules on recognition and enforcement.

Pursuant to Article 59 (2)(a) of the Council Regulation concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, Sweden hereby declares that the Convention of 6 February 1931 between Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on marriage, adoption and guardianship, together with the Final Protocol thereto, will apply in full in relations between Sweden and Finland, in place of the rules of the Regulation.

Pursuant to Article 59 (2)(a) of the Council Regulation concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000, Finland hereby declares that the Convention of 6 February 1931 between Finland, Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Sweden comprising international private law provisions on marriage, adoption and guardianship, together with the Final Protocol thereto, will apply in full in relations between Finland and Sweden, in place of the rules of the Regulation.

d) the judgment was obtained by fraud in connection with a matter of procedure; e) recognition or enforcement would be manifestly incompatible with the public policy of the requested State, including situations where the specific proceedings leading to the judgment were incompatible with fundamental principles of procedural fairness of that State; f) the judgment is inconsistent with a judgment given in the requested State in a dispute between the same parties; or g) the judgment is inconsistent with an earlier judgment given in another State between the same parties on the same cause of action, provided that the earlier judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the requested State.

a) where none of the parties is resident in a Contracting State that is not a Member State of the Regional Economic Integration Organisation; b) as concerns the recognition or enforcement of judgments as between Member States of the Regional Economic Integration Organisation.

One of those discrete developments is the cooperation agreement that the Shanghai Higher People's Court and Dubai International Finance Centre Court signed in October 2016 (reported here), which must have required the concurrence of the SPC.. The other discrete development is the memorandum of understanding on legal and judicial cooperation between the SPC and Singapore Supreme Court, signed in August 2017, relating to mutual recognition and enforcement of monetary judgments, judicial training for judges, and the Belt & Road initiative.

In his reasons, Gascon J. maintains a clear distinction between jurisdiction over hearing a dispute at first instance and jurisdiction over enforcement of a foreign judgment.