In the first place there are significant aspects of domestic law (particularly domestic constitutional and public law) where mechanisms of
enforcing judicial decisions are similarly lacking.
Not exact matches
In the release the East Hampton Town Board said it «remains confident that it will prevail in the litigation, however, out of respect for the
judicial process, the town has agreed to continue to not
enforce the local laws pending the Court's
decision.»
In deciding how to rule, New Jersey's court was guided by earlier
decisions on behalf of the Abbott districts, stating, «Like anyone else, the State is not free to walk away from
judicial orders
enforcing constitutional obligations.»
Moreover, it is apparent from the case - law -LSB-...] that the legislation indicated «that property not belonging to private persons shall be administered and alienated according to the specific rules applicable to them; that, in respect of property belonging to public entities, even those pursuing industrial and commercial activities, the principle of non-seizability of that property precludes recourse to private - law enforcement remedies; that only the creditor who has obtained an enforceable favourable
judicial decision having acquired the force of res judicata and ordering a public entity to pay, even provisionally, an amount of money, may have
enforced the specific rules [applicable].
Even though the «Child's Best Interests Principle» is considered by every country while deciding child issues, due to the differences in domestic laws and
judicial practice, the biggest difficulty is how to
enforce the
decisions ruled by courts from other legal jurisdictions by the actualities in China.
Each level of people's court should establish a centralized administrative platform for the
judicial review of arbitration awards, to strengthen the informatized management and data analysis of cases regarding applications to confirm the validity of an arbitation agreement, cases regarding applications to cancel or
enforce arbitration awards of our domestic arbitration institutions, applications to recognize and
enforce Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, Macau Special Administrative Region, Taiwan Region arbitration awards, cases regarding applications to recognize and
enforce foreign arbitral awards, and cases relating to the
judicial review of arbitration such as refusal to accept, reject the filing, or objection to jurisdiction and others relating to the confirmation of the validity of an arbitration agreement; the effective guarantee of the correct application of law and of a unified yardstick for
judicial decision - making.
Mutual recognition requires each country to trust, recognise and
enforce each other's
judicial decisions.
If uncertainty, or public concern, is enough to set aside a
judicial decision about rights, then we should drop the pretense of having a judicially
enforced Charter of Rights, and go back to the good pre-1982 days of Parliamentary sovereignty.