2:00 am (14th)-- IFC — Before Sunrise It takes a special kind of filmmaker to make a moving, entertaining, and
engaging film out of two people talking all night, and Richard Linklater is just that special.
You make the most detailed and
engaging films out there!
Not exact matches
Although the
film lacks the polished visual effects of Hollywood sci - fi thrillers, the timely political themes — including
out - of - control wiretapping, job outsourcing, and border security — make the plot both
engaging and chillingly plausible.
Despite a reunion straight
out of Lassie Come Home, a violent animated sequence, in which Beth sees her domesticated pet
engaged in the dog eat dog world of the wilderness, exposes a gap that the
film doesn't quite cover up.
Fastvold, on the other hand, certainly knows how to get the most of
out the house's isolated location (Zack Galler's cinematography has plenty of style to spare), but ultimately creates a
film that fails to
engage.
There's not much going on here that most audience members won't see coming miles away - ie the transformation of a crusty old blind character into someone distinctly more kindhearted, thanks to the presence of Quill - but the
film nevertheless remains
engaging, primarily thanks to director Yoichi Sai's patience in allowing things to play
out naturally.
Featuring a strong ensemble cast and solid camera work, the
film starts
out as one kind of story before metamorphosing into a bittersweet tale of retribution that never fails to
engage.
The main characters in the
film choose not to
engage in the reckless behavior their friends are to instead find comfort with each other, and accept how they're lives have turned
out.
The
film is also fun and
engaging, dishing
out a decent supply of chuckles along the way.
The interviews are appealing enough, if sometimes too bland, but the more
engaging passages in the
film are those that show Francis
out in the world, visiting migrant camps in Italy and Greece, mingling with the poor in his native Buenos Aires, and even spending time with prisoners in the U.S. as well as other countries.
That spirit of giddy flippancy keeps the
film pleasantly
engaging, but it also practically ensures that, unlike the books on which it's based, Peter Rabbit is rather unlikely to be recalled with misty - eyed adoration by the time the year's
out, much less over a century after its creation.
«I, Tonya» is far more
engaging when its characters aren't winking at the camera, and Gillespie almost squeezes his heroine
out of her own movie instead of more directly reckoning with her secondhand involvement in the incident that has come to define her life, but the
film always rediscovers its poise by returning to Harding's circumstances.
The
film's world - building is more
engaging than its plotting, which skews toward the generic as the embattled good guys set
out on their last - ditch effort to save what remains of humanity; there's a sense, while watching Blame!
One couldn't find a culture more different than the simian society of Planet of the Apes (1968), a
film that Schaffner was
engaged to direct after Blake Edwards pulled
out.
Like many
films by Besson — «The Professional,» «The Fifth Element,» «The Messenger» and other high - octane shoot -»em - ups — «Lucy» starts
out riveting but becomes less
engaging as it goes along.
But the
film engages extensively in gross -
out humor, without much success.
Perri was a big fan of the
film, calling it «thoughtful,
engaging and just an all - around blast to watch,» and singling
out its uniqueness in her review.
Adapted from the short
film by director David F. Sandberg and adapted by horror - centric screenwriter Eric Heiserrer, Lights
Out may be a quick, simple, and slightly familiar piece of PG -13-level horror, but it's also a well - made and unexpectedly
engaging thriller as well — with an ending that's sure to generate at least a small amount of debate among horror fans.
Dern gives an
engaging, against - type performance, though the script is stretched
out very thin to support a feature - length
film.
Maybe my expectations were duly lowered but director Francis Lawrence, who took over the series from filmmaker Gary Ross and raised the bar, and screenwriters Peter Craig and Danny Strong turn
out a surprisingly
engaging film about rebellion, propaganda, media, and the emotional and psychological scars of war, all seen from the point of view of a young woman (Jennifer Lawrence) who becomes a symbol of resistance simply by surviving with courage, dignity, and compassion.
It turned
out to be quite an
engaging story, with believable, complex characters, a fun, if dramatically - inclined, plot, and seaplane action that was surprisingly quite exciting throughout the whole
film.
For a
film that came
out in the late 90s, I was just as
engaged as if it came
out this very year.
With his previous
film I Wish, we knew that Japanese filmmaker Kore - eda was an expert at drawing
engaging performances
out of adorable young children.
Morris would just get
engaged in making a point — he's a prodigious and enthusiastic talker, a quality that's rarely on display in the many
films in which he so prodigiously listens — when the line would cut
out and I'd have to call him back, a maddening glitch he handled with graciousness and good humor.
His new
film, Free Fire, is built around a premise that is simultaneously old school and high concept: two groups of criminals in 1970s Boston arrange an arms deal in an old warehouse, things go south, guns are drawn... and they proceed to
engage in a gun battle that plays
out over the course of the entire movie, mostly in real time.
Addictively
engaging, intelligently conceived and very passionately brought to life, Blow
Out is, according to all relevant criteria, the best conspiracy
film we've seen.
Not too far from its end, the
film starts to run
out of steam, as its mystery becomes less
engaging, its dialogue less funny, and its interest moves from creative storytelling to imaginative visual gymnastics.
Working with a strategized network narrative — one that stands
out from the many in Bordwell's samples, the year 2000
film had appeared as less all - encompassing and oddly mapped
out, but after the screening I felt that device was no less disciplined as it
engages the viewer by revealing some information, dispelling some, while omitting others — those countless fades to black are welcome beats for analysis.
I caught some of the titles: Nugu - ui ttal - do anin Haewon (Nobody's Daughter Haewon) is a delightful
film from the South Korean auteur Hong Sang - soo, the story of a female student's «sentimental education» as it were, as she traverses through reality, fantasy, and dreams, we viewers never quite sure what we are watching; Jim Jarmusch's Only Lovers Left Alive (TIFF's Opening Night
film) is an
engaging and drily humorous alternative vampire
film, Tilda Swinton melding perfectly into the languid yet tense atmosphere of the whole piece; Night Moves is from a director (Kelly Reichardt) I've heard good things about but not seen, so I was curious to see it, but whilst the
film is
engaging with its ethical probing, I found the style quite laborious and lifeless; The Kampala Story (Kasper Bisgaard & Donald Mugisha) is a good little
film (60 minutes long) about a teenage girl in Uganda trying to help her family
out, directed in a simple, direct manner, utilising documentary elements within its fiction.
I'm loath to quote myself, but I'll make an exception for «Hearts in Atlantis,» which was one of the first movies I wrote about as a college
film reviewer for USC's Daily Trojan, and from which I singled
out Yelchin's performance as «wonderfully
engaging.»
If you've skipped one of the earlier
films things will make sense, but you'll not have the investment in what's playing
out to truly
engage.
Like The Survivalist, it's well worth seeking
out; this is an
engaging, suspenseful and visually striking
film that marks
out its director as a future talent to watch.
Ultimately, though, the strength of the performances and the witty, acerbic nature of the piece win
out, and instead, the
film remains a smart,
engaging work, one that succeeds in being entertaining and genuinely intelligent in spite of itself.
I encourage anyone who wants to watch a thoroughly
engaging film who has yet to see Spielberg's near - masterpiece to devote some time
out of their day to this one.
However you choose to define it, Get
Out is a wholly
engaging, entertaining and particularly relevant
film.
The public didn't respond and missed
out on one of the year's most
engaging films, with a cast full of young talent and rising stars.
Housed in a regular plastic Amaray case, Word Is
Out comes to DVD with English SDH subtitles, and a wealth of fairly
engaging bonus material that properly contextualizes the
film.
Steinmann seems to think that the mystery he's weaving is truly
engaging, but it's really just a sorry excuse for once again dragging
out the specter of Jason Voorhees, whose gory antics are so restrained by the insistence of the MPAA rating system that the
film feels like it was edited with one of Jason's bloody - rusty weapons.
And as
film criticism written by passionately
engaged people with actual knowledge of
film history has gradually faded from the scene, it seems like there are more and more voices
out there
engaged in pure judgmentalism, people who seem to take pleasure in seeing
films and filmmakers rejected, dismissed and in some cases ripped to shreds.
Where so many Marvel introductions to date have concerned themselves with dishing
out every familiar and / or accessible character traits to satisfy fans and
engage the uninitiated, Black Panther is one of the only such
films to truly distinguish itself as its own unique entity.
As long as you can get past the
out - of - place (and bad) French-esque music and massive plot hole of there being cameras everywhere in the facility except the room containing the merman, it's a pretty
engaging and entertaining
film.
While I can understand this point of view, I don't know if people are being altogether fair in tempering their reaction for what turns
out to be one of the most exciting and
engaging pure action
films to come
out in many years.
And yet in the ashes of «Avengers: Age of Ultron,» the brain trust behind Marvel Studios and directors Joe and Anthony Russo have built what is easily one of the strongest
films of their so - called cinematic universe with «Captain America: Civil War,» an
engaging, lively and just flat -
out fun use of the characters we've gotten to know across the past eight years and 12
films.
As he points
out in a Bullz - Eye interview, the sexuality here is vastly more upbeat than in «Last Tango in Paris,» and the NC - 17 rated
film is a great deal hotter and more
engaging.
The
film is
engaging, entertaining, and dark enough for me to get a kick
out of the reveling evil on screen.»
Drawing on the exhibition fight motif of Rocky's sixth cinematic
outing, much of the
film details the arduous preparation that the two elder statesman have to
engage in as they aim to be in tip - top shape for their elongated return to the ring.
Surprisingly, it turns
out to be a tight,
engaging, and well - constructed
film.
The final scene, which plays
out over the credits, acts as a nice riposte to the hand - wringing pseudo-liberal parenting nonsense that has gone on before, a satisfying end to a thoroughly
engaging film.
The painstakingly built
film universe
out of Disney's Marvel properties called Marvel Cinematic Universe will finally see its biggest moment yet as the Big Bad Thanos finally
engages in a battle against Marvel superheroes in Avengers: Infinity War.
As it turns
out, the refugees are even more peripheral, almost invisible (including the Moroccan household staff members) to the
film's narrative, which suggests Happy End is pointing a wagging finger at the entirety of white, privileged Europe, a continent
engaged in her own foolhardy, manipulative dramas, happily ambivalent to anything beyond the safety and convenience of self - imposed blinders.