We experience every day how much we enjoy being
enjoyed by other human beings....
Not exact matches
the belief on the existence of the devil
was concieved
by theologians of the past thousands of years, there
was no
other way of explaining the bad experiences of people in the past because we
were not educated yet to the kind of what we have now, Why this happened because that
was part of the learning process that God wants us to know, in pathrotheism, we
are part of God, and He himself
is evolving because He
is the universe, We
are now the conscious part of Him, our destiny in accordance to his will also
be His destiny because it
is His will.Although He prepared first all the material reality of the universe ahead of us, The experiences for us
humans including the supernatural
is just part of nirmal process for learning because its natural process, today we reach a point of not believing the practices of the past, but it does not mean its wrong, Just like a child, adults loved to tell mythical stories to them, because we knew children
enjoys it as part of their learning process.
But the vast majority of SA dogs, even those who actively
enjoy the company of
other dogs,
are only soothed
by human companionship.
Though wilderness
by definition
is a place where
humans should not leave their mark and do not remain, this certainly does not mean that the wilderness in Katmai or
other parks can not
be visited or
enjoyed.
There
are teenagers who perfectly fit the stereotypical image that the media loves so much of comic - book fans, little kids who love anime, young boys and girls out with their confused parents, cosplaying parents out with their confused children, entire families dressed up as the cast of Firefly or as Star Wars characters,, bemused grandparents
being lead around with a smile on their face that suggests while they
are a little baffled
by the entire thing they
're having a good time, middle - aged men and women who look like they've just come straight from work and
enjoy a good comic and every
other type of
human in - between.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility
is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat
others as they wish to
be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which
is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State
is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to
other states and a rule agreed to
by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to
by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration,
human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens
enjoy human rights, and many
other legal theories including tort law.
This
is so because in addition to the theological reasons given
by Pope Francis recently: (a) it
is a problem mostly caused
by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who
are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change
are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves
by petitioning their governments; their best hope
is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change
is preventing some people from
enjoying the most basic
human rights including rights to life and security among
others.
This
is so because: (a) it
is a problem mostly caused
by some nations and people emitting high - levels of greenhouse gases (ghg) in one part of the world who
are harming or threatening tens of millions of living people and countless numbers of future generations throughout the world who include some of the world's poorest people who have done little to cause the problem, (b) the harms to many of the world's most vulnerable victims of climate change
are potentially catastrophic, (c) many people most at risk from climate change often can't protect themselves
by petitioning their governments; their best hope
is that those causing the problem will see that justice requires them to greatly lower their ghg emissions, (d) to protect the world's most vulnerable people nations must limit their ghg emissions to levels that constitute their fair share of safe global emissions, and, (e) climate change
is preventing some people from
enjoying the most basic
human rights including rights to life and security among
others.
This strong ethical and moral responsibility
is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat
others as they wish to
be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which
is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State
is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to
other states, and a rule agreed to
by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to
by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c)
human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens
enjoy human rights, and (d) many
other legal theories including tort law.
The
Human Rights Committee confirms that specific cultural rights held
by a certain group
are «conferred on individuals belonging to minority groups and [
are]... distinct from, and additional to, all the
other rights which, as individuals in common with everyone else, they
are already entitled to
enjoy under the Covenant [of Civil and Political Rights]», General Comment 23 The rights of minorities (8 April 1994) paragraph 1.
the protection given to the beneficiaries
by the measure must
be necessary for them to
enjoy and exercise their
human rights and fundamental freedoms equally with
others
the protection given to the beneficiaries
by the special measure must
be necessary in order that they may
enjoy and exercise equally with
others human rights and fundamental freedoms; and