Sentences with phrase «enormous impact in the worlds»

but I think a «Crofter's Guide to Life» or «The Way of the Crofter» or «Cybercroft» would have an enormous impact in the worlds of practicing and wannabee crofters.

Not exact matches

The growing impact of crypto trade across the corners of the world is enormous and such aspect has brought attention of Fiancia in a very effective and profound manner.
As it turns out, they are talking more and more about religious revival, about the rise of new religions, about the worldwide resurgence of fundamentalism, about the enormous impact religion is having on world affairs and, in this country, about the increased prominence of the Religious Right, a movement which may already be the most powerful special interest group in America and which has given ample notice that it doesn't consider its job anywhere near done.
In the world of nano - scale technology, where work is conducted at the atomic level, even the smallest changes can have an enormous impact.
China is home to about one third of the world's smokers and reducing smoking in China could have an enormous public health impact, even on a global scale.
Second, please do not offend our intelligence with the slogan that «America is the greatest (and richest) country in the world» as this can be interpreted as patronizing, arrogant and out of line, given USA's world impact and record, and the shadow of local and global violence in the source of its wealth: I noticed that Native Americans were not meaningfully mentioned in your speech, please acknowledge the enormous sacrifices and wounds of indigenous people in the Americas and elsewhere — again, offer them justice, on their terms, not only «inclusion», listen and let them teach you.
We are getting used to explosive growth in the world of the Internet (note Facebook), but Salman Khan's creation, in a few short years, of Khan Academy, with its potentially enormous impact on the slow - moving world of K — 12 education, is still remarkable.
First and foremost, Richard has had an enormous impact on teaching and learning on Long Island, in New York State, across the country, and around the world.
Pollution from coal burning, in the United States and particularly in developing countries, has big impacts on public health, and the climate impact from coal - generated carbon dioxide could be enormous if the world's still - vast reserves are heavily exploited.
However, if one considers the enormous increase of reactive nitrogen in our biosphere, due to the use of synthesized fertilizer and the burning of fossil fuels, its impact is not part of the analysis, even tough this increase shows up in the eutrophication (nutrient enrichment) of open waters all over the world, resulting in excess algae, in some areas causing large algae blooms (as where they are going to hold the sailing regattas during the Olympics), red tides and dead zone, as the 8000 square mile dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico.
I'm sure it would have more impact thane a thousand speeches e.g. «Why in the World are they spraying» was a totally brilliant film and to this day, still has an enormous effect on waking people up.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
«If crop yields go down 10, 20, 30 percent, that would have had an enormous impact across the world in terms of food security,» he said.
Climate scientists publish in areas, that unfortunately have enormous impact on many, many people of the world.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z