We could call Davis a jack - of - all - trades, who knows just
enough about any given subject to throw around some redundant exposition when the story requires.
Not exact matches
cry, I think he would admit that such an interpretation is plausible
enough,
given the way he let the
subject matter drive his film into being more honest, at least mythologically,
about the Revolution than he had perhaps intended.
When I talk to people
about climate change (and the one time that I
gave a talk on climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant
enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the
subject.