Sentences with phrase «enough about evolution»
SpringBranch I stand by my statement that you do not know enough about evolution to discount it.
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/
I really don't know enough about evolution to answer that.
Not exact matches
@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.
You likely deny evolution and global warming for no other reason than it makes you uncomfortable and hold science to the impossibly high standard of having to explain every conceivable mystery about the natural World before you will accept it, but some moron at a pulpit doing magic hand signals of a Sundaymorning is enough to convince you he is communicating with some sky - god and turning grocery store bread and wine into flesh and blood.
When he was presented with fiftyeight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»
When he is given fifty - eight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system, he simply «not good enough».
He was presented with fiftyeight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»
Friendly Atheist: On Tuesday I wrote a post for Relevant Online about Christianity and evolution that generated a lively discussion, particularly over at Friendly Atheist, where Hemant Mehta argues that it's not enough to say that the evidence supports evolution; one must concede that the evidence rules God out completely.
He was presented with fifty - eight peer - reviewed publications, nine books, and several immunology textbook chapters about the evolution of the immune system; however, he simply insisted that this was still not sufficient evidence of evolution, and that it was not «good enough.»
Until you are honest enough to accept that (which I have), you will not be able to have a truly balanced and honest discussion about evolution.
«Humans and mice: Similar enough for studying disease and different enough to give us new clues about evolution.»
Steve: There's the conflict that's discussed, but we don't actually see any arguments on either side, and one of the things that doesn't get discussed enough is [that] there is a debate about evolution.
Neuroscientists have long wondered why the brain has a region exclusively dedicated to reading — a skill that is unique to humans and only developed about 5,400 years ago, which is not enough time for evolution to have reshaped the brain for that specific task.
Men tend to be interested in bodies and that's what women lied about, and women tend to be interested in status indicators and for much of evolution, height was a good status indicator — and sure enough men lied in exactly that way.»
While scientists generally agree that this solar system's sun and planets came from the same nebular cloud, they do not know enough about how Earth obtained its chemical composition to understand its evolution or why the other planets are different from one other.
Cultural evolution is not rapidly enough reducing this discounting by distance (caring less about situations the further away they are).
And when this statement is about evolution, it makes sense, and it's true to a point (well, not really true but the right wing * is * bad about hopping into the sack with fundamentalists and the media portrays this constantly, so it's true enough.)