We've seen too many excuses from Assembly Majority members and not nearly
enough action on this issue.
Not exact matches
Rallying against the bill included groups like Citizen
Action, which have sought to further push Cuomo to the left
on a variety of
issues (Cuomo continues to enjoy a strong approval rating from self - identified liberals, even as advocates have faulted him for not doing
enough).
That's less of an
issue in the grander scheme of things though, as I'm confident there was
enough adult supervision
on set of this middling
action adventure flick aimed at audiences still having to sneak into films with an R rating.
We work closely with our partners and volunteers to cultivate municipal
action and raise awareness about the
issue, and we have lots of resources to help cat - owners ensure their cats are safe, stimulated and get
enough exercise without roaming unsupervised, tips for bird lovers
on how to keep birds safe from cats, and much more.
The
issue is that there just aren't
enough buttons
on the Wii remote to make those
actions easy, intuitive, or comfortable
enough to perform.
[UPDATE, 3 pm:] In an interview Saturday morning, Bill (I've known him long
enough that I can't honestly put in the «Mr.» honorific) explained his focus
on the long - term concentration goal, and the limits of this particular
action, which he sees as a beginning — even after 20 years of working
on the
issue:
By questioning the science
on global warming, these environmentalists say, groups like the Global Climate Coalition were able to sow
enough doubt to blunt public concern about a consequential
issue and delay government
action.
(It is a fair assumption that Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., was not in favor of rehearing; in an in - chambers order he
issued on an earlier procedural matter in the detainees cases [applications 06A1001 and 06A1002]
on April 26, Roberts opined that «possible court
action» in the D.C. Circuit Court would not be
enough to justify a grant of review in the face of the April 2 denial.)
And if all of this is not
enough to make the case significant, it also may reveal the justices» views
on presidential power and immigration that could be relevant to other
issues pending in the lower courts, such as President Trump's repeal of the Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals program and the challenges to President Trump's threatening to withhold federal funds from cities and states that do not cooperate with immigration officials.
And indeed, that someone had
enough time
on his or her hands to actually file a disciplinary
action with the Illinois Bar, which actually took the complaint seriously
enough to
issue a reprimand.
Being that discoverability is a complicated concept, and that some limitation periods are not subject to discoverability, the safest course of
action is to
issue lawsuits early
enough that there is no need to rely
on discoverability.
Only elected members of parliament / elected members of provincial legislatures «might» be motivated to take this
issue on «if»
enough public outrage demanded
action.