Intellectually, we are at least advanced
enough as a species to discard such silliness, but people too easily allow their better judgment to be clouded by emotion.
Are we mature
enough as a species to safeguard the rights of future generations without the threat of a day in court?
Not exact matches
But in a related note, you are correct that many many
species have not made it to the present - day, only those well - suited to the current environment, and all those between their initiation and now (not easy); also all those lucky
enough to avoid catastrophic events such
as large collisions.
As long as the meme is popular enough, and requires people to face hardship to destroy it, even when our species would clearly be better off without it in the future, the masses will follo
As long
as the meme is popular enough, and requires people to face hardship to destroy it, even when our species would clearly be better off without it in the future, the masses will follo
as the meme is popular
enough, and requires people to face hardship to destroy it, even when our
species would clearly be better off without it in the future, the masses will follow.
If science able to offer any truths that would help humans solve the kinds of real psychological, social, political problems that they constantly face, then I'm sure that
as a
species we would be rational
enough to use those truths.
Think about it: The earth, at 25,000 miles «round the equator, is just barely big
enough to contain all life... and perhaps... It IS N'T big
enough to contain the (self - over-populated)
species «H.Sapiens.Sapient», («Human - Kind»)... also known
as «H.Sapiens.Egotisticae», (aka, «Egotistical Man»)!!
Biblical literalism is a powerful force today; it tends to imprison people in attitudes that were suitable
enough when science and technology were little dreamt of but which fail to illuminate a society in which, for instance, it is desirable, because of the effects of modern hygiene on death rates, for women to bear, on the average, perhaps a third
as many infants
as were appropriate two or three thousand or even two hundred years ago, a society in which war might mean something like the end of the
species, or at least vastly closer to that than any war of the past could be.
Quit putting us in wars over religion... we have
enough problems on this planet to deal with
as a
species... real problems that will take all of us, working TOGETHER, to solve.
One wonders why Johnson trots it out again in such simple and uncritical form
as his only positive argument for purposive origin of
species,
as if merely stating it was reason
enough to take the argument seriously.
While there has not yet been
enough time for different dog breeds to amount to separate
species as opposed to breeds, that is just a matter of degree.
Contemporary humanity faces, in such issues, the question of whether we,
as a
species, have
enough access to universalistic principles not only to confront and constrain recalcitrant abusers of the cosmos and the neighbor, but to guide and shape the whole of what appears to be an emerging, single cosmopolitan civilization — although it is likely to be the most diverse and culturally pluralistic civilization that ever existed.
Matt, in the article Dr. Amy says «THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not
enough to support claims such
as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire
species».
Soon, only robots will be clean
enough to run for office, and our fate
as a
species will at long last be sealed.
This showed that horns were most likely in conspicuous
species — those living in open habitats and large
enough to be clearly visible to predators — suggesting that they evolved
as defensive weapons (Proceedings of the Royal Society B, DOI: 10.1098 / rspb.2009.1256).
When testing was complete, the first hunch of the Malaysian team proved right: «Sure
enough, results from Rafe's genetic analysis showed that the frog from Peninsular Malaysia was genetically too distant from the Siberut Island Frog to be considered the same
species, so we decided to describe it
as a new
species.»
Strict followers of the biological
species concept might also have to classify some dog breeds
as separate
species, Hey suggests, because a Chihuahua can not jump high
enough to make puppies with a mastiff.
The scientists also suggest setting up extra breeding stations for key
species, in addition to the two centres already being built, to act
as arks, so that
enough amphibians could be bred to recolonise the habitats in a crisis.
In order for the shorebirds known
as red knots to survive their annual migration from the Southern Hemisphere to the
species» Arctic breeding grounds, they rely on a series of site along the way to provide
enough food for their stay and to fuel their onward flight.
Even more
species wait
as saplings for a giant to die and let in
enough light for them to grow.
Fossilized denticles, tiny tooth - shaped scales that once covered their skin, are the oldest evidence we have for sharks — though researchers disagree on whether denticles alone are
enough classify a
species as a shark.
Of the roughly 1000
species listed in the United States
as endangered, only 13 — including the American peregrine falcon and the American alligator — have rebounded
enough to warrant removal from the list.
That has squeezed out the Quino checkerspot butterfly's habitat, and with the climate changes coming
as a result of human greenhouse gas emissions, its listing
as an endangered
species by the U.S. government may not be
enough to save the pretty little butterfly from extinction.
The unprecedented rapid change could accelerate the already high rate of
species extinction
as plants and animals fail to adapt quickly
enough.
«Once we get
enough samples, it benefits the
species as a whole.»
As subpopulations moved into isolated areas, how did they remain isolated over a long
enough time for new
species - defining traits to arise in nuclear genes and become enriched by natural selection to permit speciation?
This is good news for annual
species, like the field mustard, that can adapt relatively quickly to climate changes, but portends poorly for longer - lived plants, such
as California's redwoods, that may not be able to change fast
enough to keep up.
As if rampant deforestation and poaching weren't bad
enough, climate change will have a devastating effect on the majority of Madagascar's lemur
species, most of them already imperiled, according to a paper published this week in Ecology and Evolution.
And though paleoanthropologists see the Rising Star discovery
as a major breakthrough, some question whether there's
enough evidence to prove that the hominins found in the cave are a new
species.
«Sparing tracts of land
as natural habitat is much better for the vast majority of
species than a halfway house of lower - yielding but «wildlife - friendly» farming, and we have recently shown that in the UK land spared through high - yield farming could even sequester
enough greenhouse gases to mitigate the UK's agricultural emissions *,» said Balmford.
Once the molecular analyses» results were also in, the authors had
enough evidence to assign the freshwater crab
as a
species and even a genus new to science.
The two
species also show other dental features that group them with later Old World monkeys and apes, but are still different
enough to be classified
as separate — and more ancient —
species.
Studies like this one could enable us to predict which
species will be most vulnerable to population declines due to habitat changes,
as the inflexible specialist
species are more likely to suffer when they can't find
enough of their preferred food.
«
As a human, I'm horrified that we might not have
enough time to save the
species.»
On the other hand, populations of newly evolved
species successful
enough to grow and expand rapidly must eventually crash or slow down,
as any
species uses up available resources and interact with others that seek to take advantage of their increased numbers through predation or parasitism instead of symbiosis.
We
as a
species have been eating meat long
enough to have evolved to appreciate its nutritional input.
Well, there's a simple explanation for that... humans were the ONLY
species with a well developed
enough brain to understand how to control fire and therefore cook our food... And since we've been cooking a portion of our foods for the entire existence of our
species (200,000 years)
as well
as our ancestors back several million years, our digestive systems have adapted to eating a portion of our food cooked.
Currently the prebiotic FOS is under fire for not being selective
enough for probiotics since it feeds bad bacteria such
as Enterococcus
species.
If you do want to breed tortoises, keep in mind that many
species from tropical regions never experience anything like what we think of
as winter, and for all intents and purposes, the same natural temperature drop in households should be
enough for them
as well.
The list should include perches of different diameters (including swings and ladders), beak conditioners (and cuttlebones for smaller bird
species), extra dishes (
as many cages don't come with dishes that are large
enough), litter or liners for the bottom and, maybe most importantly, toys.
As a
species, we have slept long
enough, hibernating in our own ignorance.
Most of the cages that are sold
as «hamster cages» are actually suitable for dwarf hamsters and don't provide
enough floor space for the larger
species of syrian hamster, or have components that aren't safe for a larger hamster.
Although the authors do mention «the extinction of many native animal
species on islands» [11] briefly in their introduction, the purpose of the paper is,
as the authors state plainly
enough, to «show that the number of naturalized plant
species has increased linearly over time on many individual islands.»
It is, and we must address it, just
as we must address the threat posed by all invasive
species that stifle threatened local native
species - both introduced ones like cats, rats, foxes, rabbits, pigs, mynah birds (I've given up hoping cattle and sheep farming will ever be addressed, and I've had the Man From Snowy River quoted at me often
enough by misty eyed horse lovers to know the wild brumbies must continue to run free and destroy the mountain country for everything else before dying a horrible, slow death from starvation in the cold, Winter snow) and native ones like noisy miners and eastern rosellas.
It is big
enough to include a few
species of mantella frogs
as well
as day geckos.
In fact, some
species, such
as those in the lovebird family, can become unfriendly very quickly if not given
enough attention.
However,
as with any parrot
species, their habitat needs to be at least big
enough for them to flap their wings freely.
Admittedly, smaller parrot
species such
as budgerigars (parakeets) and cockatiels are rarely given a separate play area,
as their cages can be large
enough to accommodate flapping wings for exercise and plenty of toys to play with all day.
The dilute (also known
as Maltese) gene also appears in both mice and cats, and interestingly
enough, is not associated with any abnormal coat conditions in those
species.
Domestic cats can be hybridized with other small wild
species of cat
as these are genetically similar
enough to give rise to offspring, but they can't be hybridised with other
species of animal.
Here you will come face to face with Africa's Big Five and may be lucky
enough to encounter other rarer
species such
as the endangered wild dogs and cheetah.