Sentences with phrase «enough attacking options»

Liverpool now has enough attacking options!

His role is too add balance to the midfield, as I feel Arsenal have enough attacking options and do nt need him to chip in.

Wenger is pleased with Giroud's progress since he joined the club two years ago and insists he has enough attacking options in his squad to last the campaign.

wenger had decided some time ago that we had enough attacking options to achieve 4th place with alexis, giroud, walcott wellbeck and campbell... he might be right... what is for sure we will not be challenging for titles at home or abroad... but the colonel does nt need that to keep in power so he «s happy...

It has been obvious for 2 years or more that giroud Walcott ox Campbell were not good enough attacking options to challenge for titles... wenger added Sanchez and took a failed punt on welbeck... 2 weeks to go and it's the same thing... Le prof of denial had better put his hands in his pockets and buy mahrez and another striker or season will just repeat the disappointments of the lost decade

You might be forgiven for thinking that the Blues have enough attacking options, especially when Didier Drogba recovers from injury.

Alright then, leave him going to Manure, we have enough attacking options 3.

Not exact matches

Having both Bruin and Jordan available gave us different modes of attack — without that speed option available, we're suddenly one dimensional and easy to plan for because Bruin isn't fast enough to chase down through - balls on the counter-attack.

Will Walden's triple - option offense, the nation's 11th - best rushing attack last year, be enough to save his job?

The Red Devils will have to bolster their attacking options this summer, as ultimately they haven't had enough goals from their current options this season.

We should rather concentrate on empowering our defence, because our attacking options are good enough at the moment.

These reus articles are really boring and annoying, the lad is not coming to arsenal get over it, we have enough wide attacking options anyway, I will say though that he shouldn't go to Madrid though imo, he's class but I can't see him dislodging any of Madrids front three anytime soon, especially with him being injury prone, think it would be very bad for his career in the long run

Those options have too often been quite similar though, and usually the balance has been a bit too tilted toward the attacking and creative side of the things, with not enough players or enough quality on the less glamorous aspects of the game.

Sanogo was never a first choice and the attacking options were enough (and they still are).

WMU's 2016 offense was experienced enough to attack consistently and had a big - play option in Davis.

Vardy is ok with me but if it is the end of rebuilding the attack it won't be enough to deliver top honours... It's basically a relatively cheap way of keeping fans on board... If wenger brings in a world class option such as griezman or gotze or phaps the Belgian at athletico then I think we would have a serious forward option but Sanchez vardy Walcott / Campbell / ox won't be enough

10 years is enough thank you... Should have been sold two years ago before his bubble burst and other teams realised his true worth... Not even lpool would be interested now... Sell him to whoever will take him at 140 grand a week and bring in a quality attacking option..

«I'm content with our attacking options this year... Walcott not a striker Giroud has his moments but just not good enough Campbell never plays Chamberlin doesn't score enough Ozil never shoots Santi shoots but rarely scores Ramsey....

Apart from Alexis Sanchez I do not think that any of the attacking options that have been preferred to Giroud by Arsene Wenger have been good enough to keep him out and the EPL stats on squawka.com, which in my opinion is the very best esport website, bear this out very clearly.

No matter how you slice it, you can't run an uptempo offence with Giroud on the pitch and that means sideways soccer and an over-reliance on crosses into the box, thereby negating many of the very reasons Lacazette was on your radar in the first place... we simply aren't clinical enough from wide positions to continue with that approach, which is why many fans have been clamoring for a viable alternative to Giroud for several years... once again this isn't an attack on Giroud, he clearly has some tangible skills, but his mere presence on the pitch greatly impacts your tactical options... Giroud's weaknesses are simply highlighted by the way in which our offence now moves in a more horizontal than vertical manner, which allows most teams ample time to regroup defensively before a scoring opportunity even arises... a player of Ibra's or Benzema's ilk would have been far more effective as they had size, speed and the first touch capabilities required to for intricate link - up play... once again square peg in a round hole

Sam Allardyce wants to add firepower to his attacking options, with only Modibo Maiga fit enough to play right now, with Andy Carroll out injured.

decent but just not enough creativity in the middle of the park... elneny passes the ball backwards more than ramsey... xhaka does not move ball on quickly enough... iwobi fine but ox and bellerin looked very poor so still the same issue... quality midfield ballplayer and attacking options still needed

Cesar Azpilicueta seems like the obvious choice on the right side of defence, while Baba Rahman or even Juan Cuadrado — if Conte is feeling adventurous enough — are attacking options on the left.

I feel really down when I see how the fans easily change their minds game by game... You can not define who is class and who is sh*t either because of your ignorance or because of your biasness... As an example, I have been saying Giroud is a bad option to lead our majestic attack (is it so difficult to see that) and I got so many sticks for saying that, but after one bad (bad is usual but really bad) performance from Giroud all of sudden all of you calling for his head... Another example is Mert, he is far to be good enough, it is only Kos who makes him look good... If Kos had a bad day with Mert playing good, I give Mert credit, but I never change my mind that he still not good to be starter...

A 4 -2-3-1 set - up sees United with more attacking options, whilst also having enough bodies in midfield to stem the threat of the Liverpool attack.

Worst: He struggles to find a place in Arsenal's 3 -4-3 system: not trusted enough to play in central midfield and not able to outshine Arsenal's other attacking options.

He was involved in breaking up plays and setting up attacks, with his abilities to cover enough grounds at both ends of the pitch giving his team the needed coverage in defence, and an option in attack.

Not worried bout our attacking options though, we have enough in depth, may require a shift in formation though.

The few bugs that are present (the down attack options glitch the most annoying of them) are a slight inconvenience, but nowhere near enough to take a big chip out of my enjoyment.

You need to weigh up your options with every attack - do you have enough power now to win, or could you keep drawing cards to ensure victory?

There's not too much in the way of new information, and Kotaku's impressions take a turn for the negative near the end, but I'd guess some of their complaints could stem from either the playable demo being made easy so as to be more «accessible», or them simply not having enough time to get acquainted with the movement and attack options.

You'll find this sequel has more refined gameplay, featuring several movement options, super weapon breaking attacks, and the ability to parry should your reaction speed be quick enough.