There's
enough character work to like here, especially for fans of Swanberg, and it's very nice to see the director shooting with visual eloquence on film, but a few unbelievable beats and repetitive decisions keep it from being ranked among his best.
Unlike CBS's more brutal frontal assault, Code Black, which is all action and no personality, the writers fill Chicago Med with just
enough character work to make the players interesting.
Not exact matches
The best of the youths is Thomas, who takes his one note
character and adds
enough charm and humor to make it
work.
The better ones infuse their
work with
enough chops that you can feel sympathy for the
character's POV, if not their reason for being.
The narrative's not quite as propulsive early
enough as a result, but the
character work largely compensates for it.
The partnership of Ladd and Lake
worked well but I didn't think they spent
enough time on screen together and Lake's
character was a little irrelevant to the rather workmanlike plot.
Very few of the
characters were compelling
enough to make the improvised, handheld, do - it - yourself style
work.
Yet for all the film's hard
work at capturing Savannah's spirit, there is seldom
enough context to make these
characters seem anything but adorably whimsical to excess.
During this recent interview to discuss the TV version of Zombieland, co-creators and executive producers Rhett Reese and Paul Wernick talked about the journey from TV series to movie and now back to TV pilot, what it's been like to
work with Amazon, what motivated the decision to have the same
characters from the movie on the TV show, how they envision it as a road show, how much gore they can have, what Kirk Ward (who was originally cast as Tallahassee before being replaced by Woody Harrelson) brings to this version of the
character, what led them to the 30 - minute format, whether they could have any surprise cameos (Bill Murray made a very memorable one in the film), what will determine whether the pilot is successful
enough to go to series, and when they might know if they're picked up.
Oddly
enough, the only
character representation that actually
works is Jeffrey Donovan's John F. Kennedy; he looks and sounds like him, and also contains a sense of depth.
It's such a middling entry in a well - developed genre that one must cast about for elements that
worked well
enough to justify making yet another movie about it, and using some of our favorite
character actors — Mark Strong, Jamie Bell and Abbie Cornish — as they did.
The visual displays and decent
characters work well
enough for isolated viewings, but this doesn't seem to be something that can hold up to a lot of repeats.
Veep
works because it is a compact ensemble comedy, filled with the sort of overheard details and wonk verisimilitude that has a way of making the show seem just real
enough, even when it has played coy about whether its lead
character is a Democrat or a Republican.
These performers
work well together and are supported by fantastic actors like Rob Riggle, who recites his lines with
enough energy to make his stock
character, a clueless gym teacher, feel fresh.
What makes Stung so much fun is that it takes itself seriously
enough for the plot,
characters and theme to
work, but it never pushes itself too far to the point where the whole thing feels silly.
Everest
works enough primarily because though the
characters might be bland and tough to connect with, their harrowing situation isn't, all the more realized in 3D.
This bold storytelling gambit
works because Wheatley and his collaborators (notably co - screenwriter / editor Amy Jump) have finely crafted the drama to continually up the ante, revealing just
enough about who these
characters are and what they're really up to.
Gavin Hood (Rendition),
working from a script by Guy Hibbert, thoroughly examines every facet of the arguments for and against the strike, while letting us get to know the
characters — before and during the operation — just
enough to have an investment in them and feel the gnawing uncertainty that they feel.
Bruce Dern (Coming Home, The «burbs) gives us another memorable crackpot performance, except in this one, he is sympathetically portrayed, and even though he commits some acts that most people would constitute as despicable in theory, Dern imbues his
character with
enough vulnerability to make it
work.
Cheadle's had the good fortune to
work with some genuine modern auteurs, and the films he's made with P.T. Anderson and Steven Soderbergh have allowed Cheadle
enough breathing room to craft small but enjoyable
characters: bullheaded ex-con Maurice Miller in Out of Sight, the brief glimpses of Basher Tarr in the Ocean's Eleven series, and especially Buck Swope in Boogie Nights, in which Cheadle was able to convey so much of
character's sadness and naivete through subtle through just his eyes.
Fans of the series will likely bemoan the lack of any time spent with the minor
characters and sub-plots, but the condensed version of events
works well
enough to pull you along.
He's concocted a plot just busy
enough to distract from these worn cynicisms and a set of
characters too enigmatic to dismiss as mere chess pieces off the bat, but by the end, Happy End reveals itself as something vacuous and cold, a bizarrely seductive pseudo-thriller lacking a thoroughly
worked - out payoff.
Screenwriters Roberto Orci, Alex Kurtzman and Damon Lindelof do an admirable job juggling all the
characters while
working in
enough humor to show that science fiction films can be fun, but not at the expense of detracting from the action.
It was not
enough for him to shadow motel managers, he wanted «to participate in [their] world,» and
working with Baker — who fuses his filmmaking with authentic real - life locations,
characters, and moments — allowed Dafoe to do that in a way he never had before in his career.
The best option is trying to do something completely different, and to its credit, A Bad Moms Christmas finds the sweet spot of staying true to the original
characters while adding in new dimension that may not be entirely original (Daddy's Home 2 is basically doing the same thing in a couple weeks), but
works well
enough.
Many of Swanberg's
characters work in their own right but don't add
enough to the makeup of the final product to legitimize all their erratic appearances.
Tom Cruise was the perfect choice to play Jerry; he has the look, the energy and the talent to get inside this guy's skin and make him tick, and he successfully channels his natural exuberance into his
character, tempering his performance just
enough to make it really
work.
If he isn't playing a knowingly extraverted weirdo, it's not going to
work, as Tracy Morgan's
character could never be believable
enough as a cop, a boyfriend, a partner, or even just a normal guy — all things he is supposed to represent in Cop Out.
Such
work is built upon making the labor of acting visible
enough to lend importance to a performance, and it can often lead actors to forget the more fine - tuned interiority that makes a
character feel real.
Again, we don't need a lot of
character dimensionality for a movie such as this — a little exposition
works fine, as the threats to the linemen should be
enough to prompt our interest.
Unfortunately, the Marvel formula is still at
work with a villain that doesn't really have much
character and a recognizable third act, but there's
enough amazement that you can glaze over the problems.
Though he comes across as a mild sociopath at times (like in one scene where he matter - of - factly tells Phil that he wants to rip open his antique grandfather clock to see how it
works), Gyllenhaal imbues Davis with
enough charisma that he turns an otherwise unsympathetic
character into someone whose erratic behavior is understandable, if not completely relatable.
Still, the tone of these films, and the use of terror, oppression and despair juxtaposed with opulence (remember, this was Heavensbee's plan of attack in Catching Fire)
works so astonishingly well that it almost does not matter what happens to these
characters, just their existence in the world is
enough to resonate on a baseline level.
One of the more difficult lines to straddle when creating a farcical
work is balancing treating the
characters and their predicament with
enough seriousness while still letting the audience in on the fact that you get the underlying silliness of it all.
-RRB-
works so astonishingly well that it almost does not matter what happens to these
characters, just their existence in the world is
enough to resonate on a baseline level.
A few attempts at individual
character work, but these guys are more or less chaotic good guys who are in a shady profession, but have
enough heart to do the right thing.
In their defense, they weren't given much to
work with or
enough time to develop compelling
characters that they would have had in a television show.
Perhaps if you think that changing actors and scenery every couple of minutes is
enough to keep your interest level high, and you snicker whenever you see some semi-comical
character get eviscerated, this might be the kind of movie that
works for you.
This
character's not used
enough in the first half of the film and then all of a sudden the plot shifts to use him more later on but it just doesn't
work and isn't funny causing the pacing to come to a screeching halt.
Judi Dench as «M»: Giving Dench more to
work with than she is usually asked for, Skyfall makes itself highly about this
character's importance, instead of just a tool for tension (as in The World Is Not
Enough) or being an MI6 talking head.
It's a mistake as far as I'm concerned but at least it
works better in this film than it did in the first chapter, ironically
enough in part because of a new
character who is nowhere to be found in any of Tolkein's fictions: elf warrior Tauriel (Evangeline Lilly), who brings some much - needed passion to a film filled with
characters reduced to stock types.
But hiring Alex Karpovsky to play a middling comic makes sense — not because Karpovsky isn't funny, but because he projects just
enough self - consciousness to make him seem vulnerable even when his
character's jokes are
working.
The former music video director has always seemed to have a flair for visual aesthetics but had appeared more concerned with the technique of his action pieces than in developing strong characterizations, and
working with very little in the way of quality writing, he made pretty pictures that failed to really inspire since we didn't care for the
characters enough.
Plot holes abound, with all sorts of coincidences forcing things along in lieu of
character action, and while that set - up could actually
work if The Circle turned into a The Game - like conspiracy thriller, it just limps to an unsatisfying end that doesn't wrap up
enough dangling threads.
The title of sibling filmmakers Josh and Benny Safdie's finest
work to - date may describe exactly the opposite of what their
characters experience, but that's certainly not the case for viewers lucky
enough to encounter this artful and intensely propulsive thriller.
For me, THE HOBBIT would have
worked perfectly across two parts, so before we even got to Smaug they could have left it all for the second but herein lies Jackson's qualms because if he had done that, would the first single film had
enough going on to satisfy the punters (probably not) but with three films we've lost the connection to any
characters bar Bilbo and Thorin.
Although this material is familiar
enough in outline, and succumbs to some slightly schematic emotional complications, there's much that's impressive: Michelle Rodriguez's fiercely self - possessed, emotionally nuanced lead performance, an unostentatious, completely authoritative sense of the boxing and
working - class milieu, excellent cinematography and production design, and fully imagined and well - acted secondary
characters such as Jaime Tirelli's trainer and Santiago Douglas's boyfriend.
He does an excellent job with the visuals and the camera
work, but I just can't emphasize
enough just how dull the
characters were.
There's
enough allusion to the old James Garner Bret Maverick self - deprecating characterization though as well as that
character's competence with guns and cards to make it all
work very well though.
Some of it
works, some of it doesn't, but they're all likable
enough — and the
characters spearhead some of the pic's more inspired stuntwork.