Sentences with phrase «enough liquidity on»

Respondents also talked about the importance of being cash flow positive as soon as possible, and having enough liquidity on hand when a business is founded.

Not exact matches

I know myself and my situation well enough to understand that if I had invested the same amount of money in a taxable brokerage account with more liquidity, I would have spent plenty of it on creature comforts that I don't need, and I would be worse off today for it.

What any individual bank needs to hold to maintain its liquidity in the face of stochastic adverse clearings, in addition of course to reserves of outside money, is not one specific type of earning asset, but a portfolio that includes enough liquid assets, meaning assets that can be sold on short notice with negligible losses from bid - ask spreads.

Notably, liquidity, compared to short - term liabilities, has increased over the past few years and is at multiyear highs for households and businesses, suggesting that investors have enough cash on the sidelines to buy when the market dips.

Third, they see the potential for a so - called «liquidity mismatch»: investors in MICs have seemingly been promised easy access to their money if they so wish, yet the MIC itself may not have sufficient funds on hand if enough investors rush for the exits.

Extra capital can help, but it is usually not enough when there is a run on short - term liquidity, particularly because capital is the excess of assets over liabilities.

That said, if investors are naïve enough (and last week's exuberance gives every indication that they are), they may very well rally the market on this meaningless and entirely predictable «injection of liquidity» by the Fed.

Shares are selling for less than cash / share and the company has enough liquidity to continue on its current path for another 3 years before it needs additional financing.

These instruments may be low on a downtick as the result of a high liquidity and including enough customers who will enter a long position, guaranteeing that the value will be hardly ever driven to unreasonably low levels.

Invest for the long haul, realizing there will be bumps along the way, and keep enough excess liquidity on hand.

In addition, you might suffer a loss as a result of closing your position, in circumstances which you do not have enough liquidity for the margin on your account in order to maintain an open position.

Exchange regulation might focus on investor protection and ensure money on the platform is well protected, enough liquidity is available should the worst happen and all user data is safe.

I guess it is just weighing out if losing the $ 30,000 in liquidity would set me back significantly on getting the next property or if getting better in place cash flow from the current property will help me on the finance side enough to offset the $ 30k?