Sorry, can't be done;
enough ocean cooling to provoke 3 years of thermal contraction is not caused by a La Nina of a few months.
Not exact matches
The remnants of the storm which had lashed the South Pacific brought cloud cover and heavy rains to the region,
cooling the
ocean enough to stop bleaching that had just begun in the south.
4s) then photons erupted from this energy cloud (detectable today as the microwave background radiation) 5s) photons and other particles form the bodies of the early universe (atoms, molecules, stars, planets, galaxies) 6s) it rained on the early earth until it was
cool enough for
oceans to form 7s) the first life form was blue green bacteria.
4) then photons erupted from this energy 4) let there be LIGHT (1 - 4 all the first day) cloud (detectable today as the microwave background radiation) 5) photons and other particles form the 5) God next creates the heavens (what we call the sky) above bodies of the early universe (atoms, (2nd day) molecules, stars, planets, galaxies) 6) it rained on the early earth until it was 6) dry land appears as the
oceans form (3rd day)
cool enough for
oceans to form 7) the first life form was blue green bacteria.
Since the end of last El Niño warming event of 1997 to 1998, the tropical Pacific
Ocean has been in a relatively
cool phase — strong
enough to offset the warming created by greenhouse gas emissions.
She also examined the question of how long it would take
oceans to form after the planet
cooled enough for its crust to solidify.
The study, according to Valley, strengthens the theory of a «
cool early Earth,» where temperatures were low
enough for liquid water,
oceans and a hydrosphere not long after the planet's crust congealed from a sea of molten rock.
Like polarized light (which vibrates in one direction and is produced by the scattering of visible light off the surface of the
ocean, for example), the polarized «B - mode» microwaves the scientists discovered were produced when CMB radiation from the early universe scattered off electrons 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the cosmos
cooled enough to allow protons and electrons to combine into atoms.
It's still
cool enough here in New England to make this British Khaki blazer the perfect topper, especially with an
ocean breeze.
We'd highly recommend doing this if you are fit
enough to see what you hiked from the
ocean - very
cool!
We pride ourselves with the fact that we have the only swimming pool in town where our guests, those not brave
enough to face the cold waters of the
ocean, can
cool down.
I think the runaway methane release suggested by some is not likely as long as there is plenty of ice on Greenland / EAIS as their melting will keep the
ocean surfaces
cool enough.
[Response: Well of course it's possible if you wait long
enough — and there is plenty of confirmation (stratospheric
cooling predicted in the 1960s, not observable until the 1980s, confirmed;
ocean heat content increases predicted in the 1980s, not really observable until the 2000s, confirmed; etc.).
IF
cool deep sea water were mixed relentlessly with surface water by some engineering method --(e.g. lots of wave operated pumps and 800m pipes) could that enouromous
cool reservoir of water a) mitigate the thermal expansion of the
oceans because of the differential in thermal expansion of cold and warm water, and b)
cool the atmosphere
enough to reduce the other wise expected effects of global warming?
----- On a matter unrelated to the late Sir Arthur: @Thapa (# 5), see NASA's current issue of The Earth Observer (page 16): «These findings were
enough to convince the scientists who initially reported the
ocean cooling [Willis et al. (2007)-RSB- to go back and closely reexamine the recent
ocean heat storage data they had collected.
at some point the
ocean temperature will not be warm
enough to keep the arctic sea ice melted and the sea ice will increase and halt the
cooling.
Only in certain regions, notably in the Antarctic and northwest Atlantic
Oceans, does a combination of evaporation (which increases the water's salt content) and wintertime
cooling make surface water dense
enough to sink all the way down.
Now there is another on the way, and we wait to see whether it will do the same, or whether the Arctic
Ocean has
cooled enough to protect the remaining ice somewhat.
LIA wasn't GLOBAL
cooling; but colder in Europe, north America — because Arctic
ocean had less ice cover - > was releasing more heat / was accumulating - > radiating + spreading more coldness — currents were taking that extra coldness to Mexican gulf — then to the Mediterranean — because Sahara was increasing creation of dry heat and evaporating extra water in the Mediterranean — to top up the deficit — gulf stream was faster / that was melting more ice on arctic also as chain reaction — Because Mediterranean doesn't have
enough tributaries, to compensate for the evaporation deficit.
To point out just a couple of things: —
oceans warming slower (or
cooling slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to warm or to
cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that
oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside
oceans, so no latent heat) or
oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to
cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while
oceans are slightly
cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands» warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very warmer than air during day, and how much it can slow night - time
cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be
enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
- that new estimates of aerosol
cooling are low - that new estimates of
Ocean heat uptake are low - that therefore observational estimates of climate sensitivity may prove low - that observational estimates are now good
enough that they should be preferred over models - that warming below 2C is net beneficial
The
oceans started out most probably as steam, only
cooling down when the crust become thick
enough to contain the geothermal heat.
On top of this, creating
enough microbubbles at the
ocean's surface to have an overall
cooling effect on the planet could require large amounts of energy, according to research co-authored by Evans.
Once its been cloudy for long
enough (or indeed gets dark) then I'm going to suggest the
ocean heads towards its night time vertical but with a
cool skin temperature profile.
The
oceans at the poles absorb CO2 from the atmosphere where the water is
cool enough for the CO2 to stay in solution, then the
cool water returns the CO2 rising at the equatorial warmer waters where the CO2 is then released.
The warm
oceans and open arctic will keep the snow falling until there is
enough ice volume to cause the next
cool period.
When the
oceans are warm and liquid, it snows
enough to increase albedo and earth
cools.
That causes warmer and this continues until
enough Arctic Ice is melted to allow Arctic
Ocean Effect Snow to raise Albedo and
cool the Earth.
Love your ideas - If I could have a
cool ocean breeze coming through the window that would be
enough - but alas, I dream.