But there are a number of complexities related to the viability of a new fuel, Fretheim added, such as the vehicle payback period, the need for new infrastructure, overcoming maintenance issues and sourcing
enough of an alternative fuel to test it and to fully adopt it if it works.
Not exact matches
Those
alternatives operate fewer hours
of the year, but with no burden
of fuel cost or
fuel - disposal problems the price
of power they produce could be low
enough to squeeze nuclear power out
of the mix.
But for those concerned with mpg returns, the fact that the Murano trails behind so many
of its competitors is reason
enough to seek less
fuel - thirsty
alternatives.
The myopic focus on anthropogenic climate change is diverting attention and resources from our critical challenge
of developing and transitioning to
alternative transport
fuels fast
enough to prevent massive economic harm especially to oil importing countries.
The flywheel energy stores should be capable
of maintaining electrical supply long
enough for
alternative power sources (at present probably fossil
fuelled) to power up; avoiding so much need for «spinning reserve».
If fossil power is cheap
enough that there are only x % households in
fuel poverty (Wiki: In the UK,
fuel poverty is said to occur when in order to heat its home to an adequate standard
of warmth a household needs to spend more than 10 %
of its income to maintain an adequate heating regime), but the
alternative carbon - free power increases the percentage
of households by 10 % there are negative consequences to not using fossil power.
«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set
of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production
of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate
of rise
of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates
of change
of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate
of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good
enough to indicate that continued use
of fossil
fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity
of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only
alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.
Watch this video to see what happens when
enough people push against the pillars
of support that prop up the fossil
fuel industry, and demand, instead, an
alternative reality.
Solar energy and other
alternatives are very diffuse sources
of energy, and getting the cost down far
enough to put the fossil
fuel interests out
of business is going to be very, very difficult.