Sentences with phrase «enough points as»

Yes your friend / spouse would need to have the credit card and enough points as well, but that's the best we can do to legitimately take advantage of this.

Not exact matches

These agreements are as much about expanding his footprint as they are proof points for other retailers: If White's shoes are good enough for the toniest retailers in North America, then they're good enough for Selfridges in London, Brown Thomas in Ireland, and so on.

And besides, when it comes to regulation, as The Economist pointed out, «having approved the wave of mergers, it would be a bit rich for officials to complain that there are not enough big airlines to ensure competition.»

Moreover, some point out that the reason brands don't show Williams enough love is that she is edgy, opinionated, speaks out, behaves as she wishes, and in general does not walk on eggshells — not the type of behavior that most cautious, anxious brands prefer.

If your cork is dry enough that it crumbles to your touch, you will want to immediately point this out to your sommelier or waiter as it is a sure sign that something has gone wrong with your wine.

Jupiter is about 0.001 as massive than the sun, but it's sizeable enough that both the sun and Jupiter orbit that point in space.

But, as SingularityHub.com points out, the information in these books is generally good enough for their target audiences:

Case in point: Our startups tend to sell early, often to Americans, as they are unable to find senior talent or score enough growth capital.

Ordinary metrics such as calls per day and minutes per call are a decent starting point, but they alone are not comprehensive enough to paint a complete picture of the skills of any particular sales rep.. So, consider incorporating lesser - used metrics into your performance tracking, such as voicemail - return rate, dial - to - opportunity percentage and dials - to - appointments ratio.

Yup, he says, but that's the point: «As long as you adhere to the rules you've created for yourself, over time you'll find that the strength of the habit fields keep you in place — the act of getting up, walking over, and getting situated in the chair becomes just tedious enough to keep you at the desk, leading to a prolonged work period.&raquAs long as you adhere to the rules you've created for yourself, over time you'll find that the strength of the habit fields keep you in place — the act of getting up, walking over, and getting situated in the chair becomes just tedious enough to keep you at the desk, leading to a prolonged work period.&raquas you adhere to the rules you've created for yourself, over time you'll find that the strength of the habit fields keep you in place — the act of getting up, walking over, and getting situated in the chair becomes just tedious enough to keep you at the desk, leading to a prolonged work period.»

Nor, as Boudinet point out, is it enough just to fill your resume with impressive company names.

The idea goes something like this: Build a product to the point at which it's good enough, launch it quickly into the marketplace, and then make iterations as you go while learning from your customers.

I don't doubt the momentum that EVs are building, but do you really think it will be enough to convince consumers to the point of having an effect on ICE sales as early as 2018?

With the NRA and NRA - backed politicians becoming a focal point of the conversation around gun control, people and companies are standing up to say «enough» as they join in the rapidly growing NRA boycott.

True, but I think not enough investors understand this point as everyone has spent 3 - 4 years freaking out about higher rates.

As the gap widens, it creates rising uncertainty about how excess debt servicing costs will ultimately be allocated, and at the point at which this uncertainty is high enough to alter materially the behavior of economic agents, and so lower the net asset value of the economic entity, the borrowing country has «excessive» debt.

The Triffin Dilemma, as this problem is known, points out that if foreign growth is high enough relative to US growth that the need for US dollar reserves grows faster than the US economy, the resulting US current account deficit will require that the US sell assets fast enough, or that US obligations to foreigners grow fast enough, eventually to put the US economy at risk.

When this happens and as debt levels rise relative to debt servicing capacity, at some point the major stakeholders — including businesses, creditors, household savers, workers and so on — became uncertain enough about how this gap will be allocated that they take steps to protect themselves from this uncertainty.

This is a generation that were exposed to a changing digital world as they were growing up but were unlucky enough to have a global recession occur at the point that many of them were about to join the workforce.

However, without conceding the point as to whether digital assets are securities (enough ink has already been spilled on the Howey test), white papers are evolving into documents resembling private placement memoranda typical in a standard Rule 506 private offering of securities.

The author, Christopher Jones, points out that stock owners already have exposure to real estate as large public corporations own most of the commercial real estate in the U.S. Given the short history of REITs, he is not convinced that they provide «meaningful» diversification and points out that home owners already have enough real estate in their household assets.

As I pointed out, if the futures price falls by enough relative to the spot price it will lead to a situation where there is an essentially risk - free arbitrage profit to be made by selling the physical and buying the futures.

Our point is simple: As long as you have a long enough time horizon, you should continue to add to your position in a stock when the price falls to more attractive levels, provided the long - term fundamentals are intacAs long as you have a long enough time horizon, you should continue to add to your position in a stock when the price falls to more attractive levels, provided the long - term fundamentals are intacas you have a long enough time horizon, you should continue to add to your position in a stock when the price falls to more attractive levels, provided the long - term fundamentals are intact.

As BNN reports, veteran trader Tres Knippa, pointing to recent futures data, says «there may not be enough gold to go around if everyone with a futures contract insists on taking delivery of physical bullion.»

It doesn't do Paul, Bachmann, and Santorum any good to attack Romney as not conservative enough at this point because the votes that Romney loses will tend to go to Perry.

The only question is whether a particular society has enough of the faithful to care for its poor so as not to have the charitable vocation usurped by the state, at which point it is no longer a Christian society.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

At one point Gravitational theory was bedrock, then low and behold after enough review and a more complete understanding of the universe, it is now theorized that what we see as gravity is simply the interaction of mass, space and time.

The picture of the Church that emerged was distorted by this apologetic context — too much emphasis was being given to points that were disputed (the authority of the pope, for example) and not enough given to other important points (such as the nature of the local churches).

This paraphrase is, I know, a parody that is both unfair and unnuanced, but it serves well enough to make the point that to espouse as one's purpose the promotion of the knowledge and love of God is, in our time, an act that runs against both theological fashion and the spirit of the age.

Friedrich Nietzsche expressed the point most provocatively: «As a father, God does not care enough about his children: human fathers do this better.

Your discomfort stems from the fact you don't feel this forum is controllable enough, and as has been pointed out, silence or threatened silence is another way to attempt to control the narrative.

So, even though I fully realize that at this point declining to give my full name will be interpreted as actually having something to hide (I really do not), I guess I just don't feel safe enough with those of you here to risk it anymore.

For the over-all result of the great reaction has been a sophistication of the true simplicity of the gospel, the use of a jargon which the common man (and the intelligent one, too, often enough) can not understand, and a tendency to assume that the biblical and creedal language as it stands need only be spoken, and enough then has been done to state and communicate the point of the Christian proclamation.

Fair enough, except why then did he take as his point of departure Benedict's comments about communion of desire?

Like location: the starting point isn't «where would we like to live», but rather criteria such as access to a good priest and, of course, enough space to maintain family harmony.

Or again, when we speak in the creed of the Eternal Word of God as «coming down from heaven,» we surely do not think — or at least we ought not to think — that this is a precise statement of movement from an «up» to a «down»; we all know well enough that it is, on the contrary, a most inaccurate statement from that point of view.

At one point, a Human Resource Manager was kind enough to tell me that they saw my education and experience as a sign that I was overqualified for some of the jobs I was applying for, and so they thought that I would be leaving soon after I was hired.

I'm not saying that when you'll do this you'll become an atheist (though personally I believe if you truely do think about it, that you will become one soon enough) there are a few people on this board (like JW) who has thought long and hard about god and rationalized it enough to still be a believer and make some sense, but fred, I will not be even remotely swayed to understand your point if you only use the bible as your bullhorn.

I shall return to how he suggests we understand value arising from what is being called, in his peculiar way a «society,» but the point from Adventures of Ideas is clear enough: however we learn to appreciate the status of a complex whole comprised of constituents, it must be construed in a manner which permits that complex whole to serve in turn as constituent within a larger and more complex level of organic whole.

As Richard Mauw points out, conservatives are contentious enough among themselves.

As to your second point, US law can be changed if it's so immoral that enough people vote against it.

As I hate to assume malice when ignorance is enough of an explanation, I give you a chance: just point me to any logical error in any of the major religions.

Jay's comment below made me think that I probably hadn't expressed myself clearly enough as supporting your point.

What our functional images point to is a unified attitude about ministry — complex enough to take various needs and functions and situations as they come, but with no sense of inherent contradiction among them.

As Dr. Jack has pointed out, the American government did not prepare well enough or participate adequately in the U.N. special session on disarmament because «there is no broad - based disarmament constituency» in this country.

What I find so maddening in my efforts to negotiate the barriers between my Protestantism and my seminarians» Catholicism is that while we are united in so many of our convictions and practices, we are divided by differences real enough to make the Omega Point almost as remote as in the bad old days of open hostility between our churches.

Interestingly enough, what is suggested here is the same point upon which we have already insisted: that life for human beings is a process of «becoming» and is not to be understood as an entirely completed and finished affair.

The selection alone might be enough to raise eyebrows in some quarters: can we really learn anything from Friedrich Schleiermacher?McDermott answers with a cautious «yes,» patiently discerning the shape of their central ideas while pointing out minefields as they arise.

He himself knows well enough in a way up to a certain point that he is in despair, he notices it in himself, as one notices in oneself that one is going about with an illness as yet unpronounced, but he will not quite admit what illness it is.