Sentences with phrase «enough read on this subject»

If you're well enough read on this subject, you will know the argument goes something like this:

Not exact matches

reading anything you have to say on the subject would be good for a laugh, but otherwise, I am not stupid enough to go to your ego driven site.

I've stopped reading several times, because I started thinking that David is a struggling Christian, and I've heard more than enough on that subject.

I have been reading a lot about attachment parenting pros and cons.I think that the pros are obvious.the cons however are if the parents decide they can not continue with for example co sleepng it is very hard on the child to then have to learn to sleep alone before they are confident enough to do so.for working parents the seperation to a carer is very hard and also helping parents to read the signs properly that their child wants to explore freely when they are used to protecting their little one.these are all things parents need to be aware of when adapting this form of parenting.I like it very much but I am a professional childcarer with additional childcare knowledge too and though parents always know their own child best risk for example is always an immotive subject to get across to parents that their little one needs to experience risk within of course a safe environment.

We highly doubt anybody actually needs any convincing on this subject, just perusing the mytheresa.com page and hoping your size is available is enough for most of us — reading about them is not going to be quite as enjoyable as wearing them.

While, aside from a few competitions, I haven't submitted any short stories for publication, I've read enough on the subject, and compiled all I thought would be useful.

Do you ever have the feeling that nobody is going to want to read what you write, or that you aren't enough of an expert on the subject matter of your book or product to be able to tell others about it?

When I talk to people about climate change (and the one time that I gave a talk on climate change at a physics colloquium), I always like to emphasize the fact that I am a PhD physicist who has spent considerable time reading up on the issue, including many of the actual papers in the peer - reviewed journals, but even with that background I still am not arrogant enough to believe that this qualifies me to have a truly independent opinion on the subject.

I read this website to become more acquainted with the science of climate change (I'm also attending Prof. Archer's Coursera class on climate change right now), and because this website seems trustworthy to me as someone who doesn't know enough about climate science to decide for myself who's right or wrong about this subject.

I have read Delingpole often enough to believe that there's never lack of people who disagree with him on whatever subject he chooses.

89 Edwards, supra note 3, at 160 (suggesting that subject line should «state the email's subject and purpose in terms that will be specific enough to communicate well but not too detailed to be read at a quick glance»); Chew & Pryal, supra note 23, at 136 (urging use of «short yet informative» subject lines and suggesting that «eight words is approximately the maximum number of words that most smartphone email clients can show on their screens»); Shapo, supra note 4, at 343 (recommending «treating your subject line as a brief summary of the message»).

He was kind enough to write to me after the brief meeting and seek my advice on what to read to prepare for law school; he had already read my earlier blog on this subject and was looking for more.