Not exact matches
«What the new
study showed was that the difference in amino acid values is not
enough to change the effects,
compared to whey.»
If you don't want to read a detailed analysis, I'll sum it up: the
studies didn't look at
enough cloth diapering families, and they only took the worst - case scenario for cloth (environmentally speaking) to
compare to the best - case scenario for disposable.
One
study found that babies born after epidurals were less likely to be fully breastfed on hospital discharge; this was an especial risk for epidural mothers whose babies did not feed in the first hour after birth.112 A Finnish survey records that 67 percent of women who had labored with an epidural reported partial or full formula - feeding in the first 12 weeks
compared to 29 percent of nonepidural mothers; epidural mothers were also more likely to report having «not
enough milk.»
For instance, the
study of Mattar et al. revealed a marginal increase in EB at six months after delivery among the group which received a prenatal educational intervention highlighting the benefits as well as the management of breastfeeding issues as the main content of the educational material (booklet), video, coaching session and counselling,
compared to the group receiving only the booklet and the video, and the one recipient of only routine prenatal care, concluding that that educational material alone in the prenatal period is not
enough and that specific prenatal education that addresses breastfeeding following a single meeting through counselling can significantly improve
A
study large
enough to
compare perinatal death rates accurately, if the annual rate of home births with regulated midwives in BC were to remain the same as it is today, would require 7 — 8 years of data collection.
This
study compared breastfeeding outcomes in two groups of mothers whose babies had lost
enough weight shortly after birth to be considered at risk.
Scientists
studying Forster's terns in San Francisco Bay may have found an answer: They discovered that a colony's sound, which is much easier to gather, is
enough to
compare the number of nests between colonies and across years.
The six - year
study compared pregnancy outcomes in 254 women with HG who were sick
enough that they needed treatment for dehydration with intravenous fluids to 308 women who had normal or no morning sickness during pregnancy.
Every brain is different, especially where autism is concerned, and Cooperrider's
study compares Grandin's brain with only three controls, not
enough to draw broad conclusions.
According to a
study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, people who slept only four hours a night for two nights had an 18 percent decrease in leptin (a hormone that signals the brain that the body has had
enough to eat) and a 28 percent increase in ghrelin (a hormone that triggers hunger),
compared with those who got more rest.
The FDA said that the
study may not have been long
enough to demonstrate a benefit, and noted that patients taking Vytorin in the
study had a 56 % drop in LDL, or bad cholesterol,
compared to 39 % in those taking simvastatin.
In 2008, a
study of older, non-diabetic men found that 36 months of supplementation with 500 micrograms / day of phylloquinine (K1) was
enough to significantly reduce insulin resistance when
compared with controls.6 An additional
study of healthy young men noted an improvement in insulin sensitivity after only 4 weeks of supplementation with 30 mg of menaquinone (K2) three times a day.7
In a large analysis of the link between sleep and fat loss, researchers looked at 36
studies, including 635,000 people around the world, and found that adults who didn't get
enough sleep were 50 percent more likely to be obese, and children who didn't get
enough sleep were 90 percent more likely to be obese,
compared with those who got more sleep.
I think «self - control» is not given nearly
enough weight in
studies, but I think it has the potential to be the most definitive way to
compare different treatment approaches.
The largest
study in history of those eating plant - based diets recently
compared the nutrient profiles of about 30,000 non-vegetarians to 20,000 vegetarians, and about 5,000 vegans, flexitarians, and no meat except fish - eaters, allowing us to finally put to rest the perennial question, «Do vegetarians get
enough protein?»
Studies have shown that sleep - deprived people are up to 55 % more likely to become obese,
compared to those who get
enough sleep.
In the
study, 23 % of the 60 women involved who got
enough sleep were obese,
compared 44 % of poor - quality sleepers.
I vaguely recall perhaps one
study showing a reduced (not positive) amount but it seemed still good
enough, particularly
compared to its high level
compared to other fruits.
Furthermore, these
studies are irrelevant to our discussion that ought to be
comparing, as much as possible, a very low carb, high (healthy, not corn) fat and moderate protein diet in which the participants had
enough time to become adapted, to a higher carb diet.
Most
studies comparing educational technologies with one another conclude that there may not be
enough benefits from using them.
The HMK
study investigates how well charter school students do when attending schools popular
enough with parents to be oversubscribed
compared to attending a traditional NYC public school.
However, he admits that no
studies have been conducted with a large
enough sample size to
compare middle schools fully implementing the middle school philosophy to K — 8 schools.
While the method by which schools were matched was well - detailed, and inter-school descriptive statistics were presented to help readers determine whether in fact the schools sampled for this
study were comparable (although statistics that would also help us determine whether the inter-school differences noted were statistically significant
enough to pay attention to), the statistics
comparing the teachers in REACH schools versus those not in REACH schools to whom they were
compared were completely missing.
Any legitimate
study attempting to
compare the two has found that feeding canned food does not lead to an increase in dental problems, probably because the dry food / teeth connection was based on a flawed premise (the mistaken belief that cats actually «chew» their food
enough for the food to scrape tartar off — they don't), and those promoting that theory also failed to take into the account the residue on the gums that can do as much harm as good.
That's
enough when we don't try to
study dynamic phenomena where time is one independent variable, but are satisfied in
comparing two states that differ from each other by an infinitesimal amount.
These results are likely due to a pattern observed in other
studies where men report significantly lower prevalence for IPV experienced earlier in life when
compared with women.1, 5, 10 One possibility is that if men experience less severe and threatening violence, it may not be salient
enough for them to recall later in life.