Sentences with phrase «enough supporting evidence»

Is there enough supporting evidence?

Our article critique academic papers will come with enough supporting evidence based on researched facts.

To complicate matters for me personally, while I do reserve a tiny percentage chance for the possibility of a creator, I do not believe in a god and I definitely have enough supporting evidence to «know» there is no abrahamic god.

Not exact matches

There simply is not enough hard data to support claims that Uber has a sweeping impact on drunk driving, but nor is there evidence to the contrary.

In the end, the CCBE found enough evidence to support the creation of a new family firm board effectiveness index, which has been named The Long - View.

Some people have pointed out that the price of bitcoin tends to dip around the time of the contract expirations, but I still haven't seen enough evidence to support this theory.

Enough of faith based religion, it is all childish imaginative fantasy without one single shred of evidence to support any of it.

The overwhelming evidence in support of evolution as the explanation for life as we know it will never be enough for the willfully ignorant.

Surely, there is enough empirical evidence these days to support that theory, no?

There is no evidence outside of the buybull to support the christards god, so anyone intelligent enough to realize this is not so worried and understands it is the one who is gullible enough to accept that god that is the fool.

Do this enough and eventually you build a relatively complete narrative that is internally consistent, but none of it can be supported with any objective evidence.

So He has to walk a fine line between enough evidence to support those who seek Him, and not so much that He coerces belief, in violation of free will.

While I agree that many versions of theology produce bullies, I think there's enough evidence to support a claim that conservative Calvinism particularly lends itself to misogyny and homophobia.

There just plain wasn't enough evidence to support either side's version of events, in which case a jury must acquit.

If enough evidence accumulates to support a hypothesis, it moves to the next step — known as a theory — in the scientific method and becomes accepted as a valid explanation of a phenomenon.»

Once you get through the deception and their crazy no - fact doctrine based on book where it's history has been proven false due to the lack of DNA and Archeological evidence that does not support the BOOK OF MORMON, I am glad this guy was intelligent enough to leave.

I did, and I found the evidence to support Christianity compelling enough for me to accept Christ as my savior.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

I've seen enough archeological evidence to support the claims of the Book of Mormon that the people that lived in the ancient America's really did exist when and how the book describes.

You use archeological and geological evidence to support your claim that a huge wave did rip through the middle east where noah was, the flood story evolved from that but then you have to deal with the issues of a tsunami large enough to reach noah from the indian ocean without destroying the entire world.

Most, however, do say that if there is enough evidence to support a certain claim, then that is the current truth about that claim.

Not surprisingly, both groups found enough evidence in church history to support their case.

I hope we will remember that, more often that not, what keeps a person from embracing the gospel is not that he hasn't seen enough evidence to support the existence of God in science or in logic, but that he hasn't seen enough evidence to support the existence of God among the people who claim to be following Him.

Hearing the Judge state there was not enough evidence to support an assault or harrassment is all I need.

Friendly Atheist: On Tuesday I wrote a post for Relevant Online about Christianity and evolution that generated a lively discussion, particularly over at Friendly Atheist, where Hemant Mehta argues that it's not enough to say that the evidence supports evolution; one must concede that the evidence rules God out completely.

«Assert that there is not enough evidence to support belief that God exist.»

The inquiry heard overwhelming evidence to suggest that this time was not long enough for refugees to «move on'to alternative forms of support and income.»

While we do have evidence to support different abiogenesis theories, there has not been enough verifiable evidence to confirm the hypothesis.

While this is presently a very popular topic and there is a body of evidence looking at extracts of the avocado seed, the fact is there is not enough research to support consuming an avocado seed.

I am so fed up AKB's like yourself Budd, that criticize real fans because they dare to question the almighty Wenger, even though there is so much factual evidence to support the claims that Wenger is not good enough any more.

What we should know from Henry by now, with enough evidence to support it, is that he is a Gooner and his heart speaks in abundance, therefore for him to criticize his club and come out with these words must have been difficult.

While there is not enough evidence to support that green tea can cause low birth weight or birth defects, there still is a relationship between said tea and folic acid absorption.

I just finished my CLC (Certified Lactation Counselor) and they spoke about this and provided the same research with the same conclusion: fenugreek doesn't have enough evidence to support the claim that it help milk supply!

Matt, in the article Dr. Amy says «THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesEVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&SUPPORT THOSE CLAIMS»: maybe I'm wrong, but to my non-native understanding, this sentence doesn't necessarily mean «there is no evidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence at all», but rather: any evidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire speciesevidence there might be, it is not enough to support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species&support claims such as «increased medicalization of childbirth may be having severe consequences on the life - long health of our children... What's more, it could be having a devastating effect on the future of our entire species».

But there's not enough evidence to fully support that, nor does it guarantee that your baby won't have health issues later in life.

Our results support current evidence for educational intervention since mothers with more information about EB, and therefore more knowledge, are more likely to practice it than their counterparts who lack enough information.

There is currently not enough evidence to support routine recommendations against co-sleeping.

The nutritional content of breastmilk is evidence enough to support the argument for health / immune support benefits.

Most experts agree there's not enough evidence at this time to support the use of probiotics to treat colic.

Likewise, he was not asked to recommend sanctions (presumably because she is no longer a government employee)- he was only investigating whether there was enough evidence to support filing charges.

The report's conclusion is fiercely opposed by committee Democrats, who say the committee did not interview enough witnesses or gather enough evidence to support its finding...

Bharara also examined how Cuomo aides interacted with the supposedly independent body, but concluded there was not enough evidence to support criminal charges.

The watchdog also raised issues with the evidence which had been gathered to support the data retention, saying: «There is not enough relevant and accurate background documentation which demonstrates the necessity of the instrument».

During a brief hearing on the search warrant application Smith told Herrick that he has established probable cause to support his request and uncovered enough evidence to show that dozens of absentee ballots for the Working Families Party were forged and attributed to voters who had no role in filling them out.

The senior member subsequently flagged the contribution when Kasowitz notified the office of his involvement in the Trump case and instructed the campaign to return it, and the office concluded its probe after two years because it did not yield enough evidence to support a criminal prosecution.

This comes after FBI Director James Comey testified last week that he had no evidence to back up Trump's claim that former President Barack Obama had wiretapped Trump Tower and after the House of Representatives failed to gain enough support through the week to pass the American Health Care Act (AHCA) to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act, also known as Obamacare.

They assert that there is also no evidence strong enough to support many of the current guidelines, a situation that forces physicians to rely on assumptions or historical practice to decide antibiotic treatment.

Sure enough, there is as yet no experimental evidence to support this view — indeed, the improbability of ever reproducing black holes or big bangs in the laboratory has caused some researchers to wonder whether there will ever be any evidence.

Kukalova - Peck pointed out that the gliding theory not only lacked practicality — until their wings grew long enough to glide, bugs who jumped out of trees would have fallen on their mouthparts — but there was no fossil evidence to support it.

Anthropologist William Y. Adams, a professor emeritus at the University of Kentucky and a respected world figure in Nubiology, thinks Kendall has yet to collect enough empirical evidence to fully support his «interpretation of the mountain and its symbolism.»