But over a long
enough time horizon, global warming is still with us.
Over a long
enough time horizon, seemingly small differences in expense fees can add up and make a big difference in your portfolio.
This is especially true because you can mostly eliminate price risk by timing (unless you buy a lot of stocks in 1999, 2007, etc. you will dollar cost average into a decent enough stock price) and most macroeconomic risks dissipate over a long
enough time horizon.
Those with a long
enough time horizon can take advantage of these stocks for their long - term dividend growth potential.
I've selected a 30 year time horizon for no real particular reason other than 1) that's the most recent data, 2) it is a long
enough time horizon to flush out some noise in the numbers and give a more accurate representation, and 3) I'm 30 years old so why not.
(Diversification) # 2 My investments are subject to a long
enough time horizon.
It seems like anything considered safe is yielding practically nothing nowadays, and I have a long
enough time horizon to tolerate some risk if it can be justified by higher expected returns and better diversification.
Our point is simple: As long as you have a long
enough time horizon, you should continue to add to your position in a stock when the price falls to more attractive levels, provided the long - term fundamentals are intact.
The only requirement is you stick to your allocation and have a long
enough time horizon.
Interestingly enough, it's actually so simple, and so straightforward, that it would have helped almost any investor make quite a bit of money over the past couple of centuries regardless of market conditions provided he or she had a long
enough time horizon.
Not exact matches
On paper, it's easy to make a case for a three - or four - year
time horizon - long
enough for appreciation to offset the real estate agent's commission and other costs of buying and selling.
If you are concerned that your allocation is not aggressive
enough to make you a Samurai, just pick a target fund with a longer
time horizon (e.g., 2050 instead of 2040).
Even if your
time horizon is long
enough to warrant an aggressive portfolio, you have to be comfortable with the short - term ups and downs you'll encounter.
At longer
horizons, the 6.3 % growth rate that we've assumed for nominal GDP over the coming years will begin to bail investors out given
enough time, and as a result, our projection for 10 - year S&P 500 nominal total returns peeks its head up above zero, at about 2.4 % annually from current levels.
Recessions are common
enough that you can count on several of them impacting your portfolio over the course of even a 10 - year
time horizon.
Uncertainty equates to risk under only two circumstances: first, if your investment
time horizon is not long
enough to wait out an asset's reversion to its fair value.
This isn't a problem for investors with long
time horizons (say 10 + years to retirement) or large
enough portfolios to live entirely off dividends, but if your portfolio is small and you need to periodically sell shares to fund living expenses (such as with the 4 % rule), then this short to medium - term risk is something to be aware of as you think about portfolio diversification.
The rotations suggested that, at the event
horizon, the field is hundreds of
times stronger than Earth's magnetic field, and strong
enough to produce the jets that slow the hole's chomping.
Find a straight, clear road, and
enough of your own bravery, and you'll struggle with how quickly the speedometer climbs and the
horizon comes at you when you flick the left paddle shifter a few
times and put the pedal to the metal.
You'll also have to find a high - grade municipal bond that fits your
time horizon with a yield high
enough to beat the other short - term investment options.
If your
time horizon is long
enough, you may be able to pay down the rental property debt before you retire.
Riskier assets like stocks have a higher rate of expected return so if your
time horizon is long
enough, don't avoid stocks completely just because they are more volatile than fixed income or cash.
Often, those who begin investing when they are young can deal with market declines because their
time horizons are long
enough to provide sufficient
time for their holdings to rebound if they dip.
If someone had the imperative of dollar - cost - averaging into Clorox stock every month with a
time horizon of 25 years or more, the current valuation is nowhere near being excessive
enough to stop the monthly contributions.
Certain bond classes are risky
enough (with commiserate yields) to be useful in diversifying a higher - risk / higher - return portfolio with a long
time horizon.
Because you are a young investor, you must apportion most or the entire contract values in what they call as «subaccounts» that invest your funds in stocks, for the reason that their
time horizon is lengthy
enough to permit them to regain losses incurred in the markets.
I think it's fine to use an average ROR of 5.25 % on the new portfolio and new contributions if the
time horizon is long
enough, however, the couple are needing the cash flow and growth of investments to pay off in the very near future.
Though we might mark down those percentages today, the idea is correct, so long as the investor's
time horizon is long
enough to average out the lumpiness.
Paragraph 2: First, rebalancing is almost always a good idea, but it presumes the asset classes / subclasses in question is high quality
enough that it will mean - revert, and that your
time horizon is long
enough to benefit from the mean reversion when it happens.
And although the stock market hasn't been kind to savers lately, those with a long
time horizon before their kids reach college have
enough time to ride out these tough
times and can expect better returns ahead.
I mean, picture you're a 30 yr - old who's lucky
enough (these days) to have a pension — considering your
time horizon, a 100 % allocation to emerging / frontier markets might be a perfectly rational choice, yes?
Even if your
time horizon is long
enough to warrant an aggressive portfolio, you have to be comfortable with the short - term ups and downs you'll encounter.
Taking action was the best choice, and a little risk and volatility were acceptable if my
time horizon was long
enough.
Timing matters greatly, because no matter how long we think our investment
horizon might be, it's usually long
enough to ride out the deep troughs in the market.
The good news is that if your
time horizon is long
enough you don't have to rely on shenanigans to boost your point balances.
It's interesting reading and you probably know pieces of these stories already, but you can never read
enough of how Nintendo and Rare wowed the world with a slick marketing campaign for Donkey Kong Country at a
time when the Super NES was aging quickly as new 32 - bit CD - based consoles were on the
horizon.
Combining a Surrealist sensibility with a Minimalist aesthetic reminiscent at
times of American folk art, Lundqvist populates stark settings, often dominated by the a flat
horizon line, with characters in situation detailed just
enough to allow viewers to imagine the depicted scenarios.
Yet I have not heard of a single weather derivatives group which claims to profess weather and climate with «investment accuracy» (accurate often
enough to be worth betting modest sums on) over more than a one year
time horizon.
Nobody expected that this model could predict the behavior of a real thunderstorm — for one thing, it would be impossible to gather the data necessary to initialize it; for another, if thunderstorm behavior is chaotic, then no amount of data would be
enough to allow prediction beyond a short
time horizon.
Second, the cap and trade system does not provide
enough prices to bring about changes in energy production technologies (the investment
time horizon for new technologies is often, if not typically, longer than the cap and trade period agreement).
While they may appoint someone in operations or an interested staff member to try to keep up, few GCs truly have adequate resources to stay across this rapidly - changing space or have the right personnel with either
enough time or the required skillsets to spend their days peering into the
horizon.
Of course, the bond interest might not quite be
enough to cover the traditional LTC premiums right now (and therefore deplete principal slightly), but it will be more than
enough once rates rise, which again seems like a reasonable «bet» for someone who still has a 10 - 20 + year
time horizon for long - term care and retirement needs (and over that
time horizon, the client could have generated an amount equal to the hybrid life / LTC death benefit just with normal growth!).
Ultimately, this report from KGI probably arouses more questions than it answers; but it seems to give us a glimpse of what lies just over the
horizon so that some people might now have
enough time to be able to save up for the next generation of iPhone if they haven't managed to scrape together up to the $ 1000 required this year.
Your main investing objective should be to purchase diversified funds that have
enough underlying stocks for your risk appetite and
time horizon.
«It provides a
time horizon that is long
enough to get things done, yet short
enough to create a sense of urgency and a bias for action.»