Sentences with phrase «enough time talking»

The number one theme that we had going into gamescom was getting the feedback from the E3 press conference, where we seriously didn't spend enough time talking about PS Vita content and what we have for the future.

We definitely don't spend enough time talking about nutrition for our cats, so this week we'll chat with Deb Greco, a Senior Research Scientist for Purina, about our cat's whole body health, especially...

But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that I spend a lot of time talking about how crucial engagement is, and not enough time talking about how to measure it.

We spend enough time talking about the Common Core at StateImpact to know writing polling questions about the new standards can't be easy.

«I don't think I spent enough time talking to families who were suffering issues of gun violence throughout the state.»

«I don't think I spent enough time talking to families who were suffering gun violence throughout the state, and I didn't spend enough time talking to families who were suffering from horrible immigration laws.

We spend so much time talking past each other and not enough time talking through our disagreements, and if we can start to find compassion for one another, then we have a shot at building common ground.

Not exact matches

«Everyone talks about the importance of being willing to fail, but more importantly it's being willing to have enough humility to recognize ahead of time that you don't know all the answers, that you do need other people's help.»

Brexit talks are a «very difficult process» but they need to move fast to give enough time for officials to negotiate a trade deal, the vice president of the European Commission has told CNBC.

It asks, it listens and it churns out a new product every six to eight weeks — «enough time to get it, use it, shoot it, talk about it and then you have another one,» Weiss says.

Set aside a time to discuss money matters, and when you do talk, don't criticize with statements like «you don't earn enough» or «you're spending too much.»

Though the U.K. remains a full member of the European Union until, at least, March of 2019, transitional talks need to end by October of this year to allow enough time for parliamentary approval across the EU — giving U.K. and EU negotiators less than 10 months to decide how both sides will cooperate in the future.

As a result, we spend too much time talking and doing and not enough time listening,» she says, diagnosing her generation.

Raising funds takes time; if you want to have a good chance of raising enough capital, you need to come up with a large list of potential investors to talk to.

The first two items above are pretty self - explanatory, but one element of trading success we don't talk about enough is the importance of having a consistently winning market timing system.

The SDR will learn more about the prospect to determine if the prospect is qualified enough for the account executive or sales team to put time and effort into talking with them.

Same - store sales growth in the quarter was modest, increasing 1.1 % at Jack in the Box restaurants and 0.6 % at Qdoba, but at a time when analysts are talking about a «restaurant recession,» the upside results were enough to propel the stock higher.

Some of it is time, but mostly the problem stems from a mindset that marketing doesn't need to talk to buyers, that others in the company know the buyer well enough.

Speaking at a party retreat, House Majority Leader Eric Cantor told his colleagues that the party had spent too much time talking about the concerns of business owners and entrepreneurs and not enough about the concerns of that majority who were not (and in many cases did not want to be) business....

The truth is, everything on this list is worth doing in your twenties (or your teens, if you're so inclined) but we talk about it like this because though nothing magical happens on your thirtieth birthday, 30 years is enough time to work out some of life's kinks and pick up on some good habits.

You spend so much time talking about things like grace, yet you don't seem to have enough of it to allow those who have a different view and / or style of interaction from yours to express themselves without your lecture of improper behavior.

The debates occurred at a time when there was enough Enlightenment talk about «Nature's God» to compromise evangelical talk about the God of the Bible in the affairs of the United States.

And the one you heard was not our best, at least not mine... It was the first time that Liz had ever read any of those Scriptures, so I thought we would have enough to talk about just confronting the content of the story, but it was actually kind of slow.

We talked of daily Quiet Time, of Bible study, prayer and listening, and of the power of God to lead and guide those who are obedient enough to be led (Shoemaker, Children of the Second Birth, pp. 148 - 49).

In previous series of posts, we have looked at two areas where churches often spend too much time talking and not enough doing: Doctrinal Statements and Prayer Meetings.

Now that people in the mainline denominations are starting to talk unembarrassedly about church growth and evangelism of a fairly conventional sort, Wheeler worries that the potential exists for any emphasis on congregational studies to be misinterpreted as an outgrowth of the spirit of the times — which views local communities of believers uncritically, as in - arguably good things, and assumes that if there is anything the matter with them it is that they aren't big enough.

I have had this experience three times now, on three different occasions, in admittedly similar circumstances, but not similar enough to explain the coincidence: I am speaking from a podium to a fairly large audience on the topics of — to put it broadly — evil, suffering, and God; I have been talking for several minutes about Ivan Karamazov, and about things I have written on Dostoevsky, to what seems general approbation; then, for some reason or other, I happen to remark that, considered purely as an artist, Dostoevsky is immeasurably inferior to Tolstoy; at this, a single pained gasp of incredulity breaks out somewhat to the right of the podium, and I turn my head to see a woman with long brown hair, somewhere in her middle thirties, seated in the third or fourth row, shaking her head in wide - eyed astonishment at my loutish stupidity.

She saw me doing this, and despite how easily she could talk with people and build relationships with them, she often felt that she wasn't spending enough time «in the Word» or reading theology.

He was gracious enough to take the time to talk with me at length about all things missional.

And in this way each time that repentance comprehends guilt it understands that the eleventh hour has come: that hour which human indolence knows well enough exists and will come, when it is talked about in generalities, but not when it actually applies to the indolent one himself.

It's kind of like when you are a kid and you hear your parents talk about when they were young... when you are old enough to realize that they haven't always been «parents» and at one time they might have actually been cool... that was what happened to me at the sight of the recipe card.

Enough talking — time to grab your fork and get cooking.

My almond flour came just in time: — RRB - Thank you for not talking about the inauguration - I've had enough for today.

It is quite disturbing to read (most of the time) fans talking about some potential recruits or even current squad players «not being good enough to play for Arsenal»...!!!

My idea of a hero is a student / individual who: «cents Helps a person with special needs «cents Takes time to talk to the new kid «cents Asks someone how they are doing «cents Stands up for those who aren't strong enough to do so themselves «cents Makes sure others know that they care about them «cents Is a leader who sets an example that treating others negatively is wrong «cents Isn't a follower when others are being treated unfairly

Ballard better draft 3 O - line with his first 5 picks or you will see a RANT, enough of talking about the trenches it's past time to FIX THE O - LINE.

We have botched tanking this year, to a bad enough extent there was a solid time frame where people were actually talking about a playoff push.....

I hope the manager will have enough support so they can focus on the players and teams preparations for the upcoming season and not spend all that time talking to agents to agree on a fee etc... let the board do that and moan at the board till they get a top support team in.

You want to talk about a cluster fuck, it's hard enough to move the ball on that defense, but giving up yards because of presnap penalties when the Panthers already couldn't get their running game going almost guaranteed they would end up facing yet another third - and - long every time it happened.

A player like Giroud is not really a super sub ok.He is is just not a super sub.The one who i really call a super sub in the team is Rosicky.He actually is.I am not going to waste my time talking about how good or not he is as it is really plain for everyone to see.The truth shall set you free.There are players in our squad that are not good enough yet fans support them and complain when we win nothing.Let those who have ears hear.

We have had enough time to now to build a decent squad, I'm talking from about 2012/13 when we started spending good money on players.

Enough with the small talk leading up to the game; the time has finally come where you need to pick a side and give a prediction.

In the summer there's enough time to talk about other things.

All this «Wenger plays his card close to his chest» malarkey is just an excuse, The press do spin stories when they have nothing else to talk about BUT there's a grain of truth is all of them, it's as plain as that, last year the press had an inkling about Sanchez coming to u and thus it was proved a I've said many times on here Wengers statement prior to the end of the season are clear if you look back at what he said going back season after season, He said That Olivier Giroud WAS in his opinion good enough to fire Arsenal to PL glory.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

We are being told all the time if he finds «exceptional players» and i see that as an excuse not to bring in new players and believe in what we have which are not good enough if we are talking about winning EPL — we have few players who were not supposed to be around if we are serious in competing — Arteta, Rosicky and Flamini just few to name.

Hey SoOpa AeoN you got a cool but yoy don't talk cool at all along with rkw.I didn't like the way Chicarito's name was rubbed in the mad and what pains me is that you all think Giroud is better.The fact that you are a team reject does not mean you aren't good enough or can't be world class.Do you want me to name a few rejects who have become world class or have come back to haunt their teams.If I was to choose between sticking with Giroud or Chicarito for thousand years we all know who people would go for.The over hyped average players in our club is unbelievable and it's just sad.The club is also over hyped at times and we feel like we are so so big.It's a shame.The mentality of this club is so so bad and trust me with this characters success will be far away for centuries to come.

I have noticed you for many transfers talk the same rubbish and what ever you say is never justified as each time you say we have enough to win prem but we never do due to weak links within our squad ie giroud

Vin Scully talked about: He didn't have enough time to talk about much — the at - bat was over that quickly.

Picture this, we don't come out of the gate firing on all cylinders, Wenger speaks of how there wasn't enough time for the first - teamers to build chemistry, several key players aren't even playing because of Wenger's utterly ridiculous policy regarding players who played in the Confed Cup or the under21s and the boo - birds have returned in full flight... if these things were to happen, which is quite possible considering the Groundhog Day mentality of this club, how long do you think it will take for Wenger to recant his earlier statements regarding Europa... I would suggest that it's these sorts of comments from Wenger which are often his undoing... why would any manager worth his weight in salt make such a definitive statement before the season has even started... why would any manager who fashions himself an educated man make such pronouncements before even knowing what his starting 11 will be come Friday, let alone on September 1st... why would any manager who has a tenuous relationship with a great many supporters offer up such a potentially contentious talking point considering how many times his own words have come back to bite him in the ass... I think he does this because he doesn't care what you or I think, in fact he's more than slightly infuriated by the very idea of having to answer to the likes of you and me... that might have been acceptable during his formative years in charge, when the fans were rewarded with an scintillating brand of football and success felt like a forgone conclusion, but this new Wenger led team barely resembles that team of ore... whereas in times past we relished a few words from our seemingly cerebral manager, in recent times those words have been replaced by a myriad of excuses, a plethora of infuriating stories about who he could have signed but didn't and what can only be construed as outright fabrications... it's kind of funny that when we want some answers, like during the whole contract debacle of last season, we can't get an intelligent word out of him, but when we just what him to show his managerial acumen through his actions, we can't seem to get him to shut - up... I beg you to prove me wrong Arsene