Sentences with phrase «enough understanding on»

Due to lack of climate data in the coastal areas, there is not enough understanding on the impact of changing climate on coastal ecosystems.

Not exact matches

Startups require someone who is hands - on and flexible and who has been close to the ground recently enough to understand not only how to manage people and develop processes, but also how to roll up his sleeves and do it themselves.

«[Eventually people] did enough research on their own to understand, «Oh no, Square was founded by Jack Dorsey, Flipboard was founded by Mike McCue.

The concept of using online engagement as a way to understand consumers, particularly during sweepstakes, has caught on enough to spawn a micro-industry of its own.

Too many Millennials complain about not getting paid enough while they do one of two things: they either do not ask for a raise, period, or they do not take the time to understand what would warrant a raise and going all - in on acquiring that skill set.

«There is a large enough number of consumers out there who understand that a lot of the content on the Internet has to be supported by advertising,» he says.

«What that means in short is that he understands the back - end workings of the business well enough that he could rebuild them himself (well, almost), and he also cold calls customers and says things to journalists aimed to warm consumers» hearts, such as: «On Valentine's Day in Chicago, we had every driver give every woman who got in the car a rose.

Neff's research helps us understand the health of massive glaciers with behavior we still don't fully understand but that lock up enough water to drive up global sea levels on the order of meters, not inches.

Since you face the risk that your money will be spent on something that won't generate enough revenue to pay you back, you will want to understand the borrower's plan and hopefully have the business savvy to do that.

I understand that an idea and business have to be tough enough to withstand competition, but sometimes having that jumpstart on the market is essential.

The biggest mistakes startups make are not talking to enough prospects before diving in and not understanding the target market, which might result in focusing on multiple ideas rather than one main idea.

I know myself and my situation well enough to understand that if I had invested the same amount of money in a taxable brokerage account with more liquidity, I would have spent plenty of it on creature comforts that I don't need, and I would be worse off today for it.

While I understood asset allocation well enough, it was hard to ignore all the «easy» gains that people were making on internet stocks»

I know why many traders don't focus enough on capital preservation and risk management: because they mistakenly think it's not «fun» or «exciting», but that's only because they aren't thinking about it right or they don't fully understand how powerful it is.

These sorts of special companies are rare enough that I truly don't understand why people aren't chomping at the bit to get their hands on some, not in the usual sense of «picking stocks», but as a permanent addition to the family's collection of assets that throw off passive income.

You will have enough information at your fingertips to understand where your money comes from, where it is going, what you have, what you owe, and if you are on track to meet your financial goals.

Once you have them on your landing page, provide enough context so that your visitors can fully understand what your campaign is all about...

A strategy simple enough for anyone to understand and one that runs on «autopilot» once it's set up.

The coach will design personal learning plans for each young staffer based on what they want to accomplish during their brief two - to five - year stint at the company, and understand their values and interests well enough to ensure a smooth landing at their next job.

It's not enough to take seriously writings based on other writings, based on word of mouth stories handed down from other writings and word - of - mouth stories from millennia ago when man didn't understand a lot of things and was afraid of them.

And I knew enough to understand that writing autobiographically can be like performing surgery on yourself without anesthesia.

When the erosions of age begin to leave their mark on my body, and still more on my mind; when the ills that must diminish my life or put an end to it strike me down from without or grow up from within me; when I reach that painful moment at which I suddenly realize that I am a sick man or that I am growing old; above all at that final moment when I feel I am losing hold on myself and becoming wholly passive in the hands of those great unknown forces which first formed me: at all these sombre moments grant me, Lord, to understand that it is you (provided my faith is strong enough) who are painfully separating the fibres of my being so as to penetrate to the very marrow of my substance and draw me into yourself

And whatever happened on the cross, however we impose meaning and narrative and metaphors onto it, however we try to explain or understand it, this is the truest truth of it all: it was enough.

I'm not saying that when you'll do this you'll become an atheist (though personally I believe if you truely do think about it, that you will become one soon enough) there are a few people on this board (like JW) who has thought long and hard about god and rationalized it enough to still be a believer and make some sense, but fred, I will not be even remotely swayed to understand your point if you only use the bible as your bullhorn.

But one of the principles of Reform Judaism is that revelation is a continuous process, which means that it's perfectly «kosher» for our understandings of scripture to continue evolving and changing — and also means that it's incumbent on each of us to learn enough to determine how to understand this story for ourselves.

Griefs anger may first appear as only a means of placing blame — on the doctor for a misdiagnosis, on the minister for not saying enough at the funeral, on parents and friends for failing to understand.

That dissonance is evidence that you simply don't know your partner well enough, and don't understand how your perspectives on money can mesh into something beneficial to everyone in your family.

At the same time, he's saying we need to respect faith enough to understand that many people will rely solely on that for their views and we should accept that doing so is not necessarily a bad thing.

Just because man is able to split the atom in half and go to the moon, swim in water when man is made for land (boats), travel faster on land (car, train) than walking, and fly when man naturally does not fly (plane)-- all that is not enough to establish that man has the capacity to understand the evidence of God's existence.

Though I know enough about transcendent truth to base my life on it, I also realize that it expresses and manifests itself in ways far more complex than I can fully understand....

my opinion on this is the woman is capable and old enough to understand what is the consequence of their action, and they can choose with mature understanding to do what they want to do, unlike the fetus or children, they are still pure and innocent..

Kinda makes a poor judge of character, so if you are willing to debate freely in a conversation on life, the world, the pursuit of knowledge, and all the unknowns in the world with an underage male, then I encourage you to continue the debate freely, but if you feel outmatched in a knowledge criteria and you wish to avoid shame of not understanding enough or even not knowing enough (because they are different) then i will gently step aside as not to harm your ego.

For we have, for example, in the parables, in the beatitudes and woes, and in the sayings on the kingdom, exorcism, John the Baptist and the law, sufficient insight into Jesus» intention to encounter his historical action, and enough insight into the understanding of existence presupposed in his intention to encounter his selfhood.

Neighbors and friends, family and associates, the human race of which we are part; all these, as any profound understanding of our humanity makes clear enough, are contributory to our own becoming and we on our side make a similar contribution to them.

Bonhoeffer must be understood on his own terms, but in the case of Ethics, the text alone is clearly not enough to convey the ideas.

So certain Christians who recognize all of this, argue that the Bible is simple enough to be understood by anybody, and those who go on for education only educate themselves into ignorance.

I understand this tendency, and I've lived long enough to know there is no value in entering a protracted debate on biblical minutia.

I am glad to hear from both of you and I appreciate your comments on me... unfortunately some muslim's action does not reflects what Quran tells a muslim to be... and ppl take these incorrect actions as the teaching of Islam... i was referring to go and read, sometimes reading will not be enough for you to understand as it is translation... sometimes translation does not give you correct as the quran was revealed in Arabic language... i would recommend if you don't understand some then please go to someone you know who has a real knowledge and not to show off....

Because of its multilevel wave structure, and because there is always a wave reaching forward at a higher level, and there are enough downbeats to remind us of that, music has the power to introduce us to just this kind of enriching meantime and help us understand more deeply what it means to wait on God.

I don't pretend to have it all figured out or even much of it, but I'll keep on praying for healing for those who need it, knowing it is not my magic nor hocus pocus from God, but that the Bible suggests I pray for those who are sick and sometimes those who were hurting and in pain actually get healed and stay healed - so I'll pray on even if I don't understand it all to a T. Because not everyone I pray for gets healed is not enough reason for me to stop my praying.

She's been brainwashed long enough to believe that she can't patch an electric wire; that only young, attractive women have anything to say on television; that she doesn't understand anything about business and politics.

But on the whole, there is enough evidence at least to suggest that, if one wants to have both a market economy and democracy, it is better to have the former precede the latter» if you will, to have perestroika before glasnost (it being understood, of course, that Gorbachev had something other than full capitalism in mind with the former term, and something less than full democracy with the latter).

It has failed for two reasons: because it has not taken seriously enough the demonic nature of general television; and because it has proceeded on an inadequate understanding of the nature of the Christian gospel.

You hide behind lies told by many others and support them fully and propagate your own or repost lies told by people in deceptions and don't understand basic truth like a animal that does things on instinct just destroying for the sake of it in hopes to destroy enough that they can change things to be more suited to themselves.

In any event, and with all respect to a distinguished scholar - cardinal who has been kind enough to praise my own work on John Paul II and from whose books I have profited over the years, it does seem to me that Cardinal Kasper's analogy between his proposal on Holy Communion for the divorced and civilly remarried, and the development of Catholic self - understanding that led to Vatican II's affirmation of religious freedom, just doesn't work.

Which if you don't understand is ridiculous, as we have more than enough proof on both the fact that the earth is a sphere and that the earth is 4.3 billion years old.

This range of opinions does not exhaust the list of possible alternative understandings of the resurrection, but it is enough to indicate that the church is not of one mind on the question of what happened that first Easter.

You said, «However, anyone with enough mathematical knowledge would find it perfectly acceptable, and understand that the «first principles» from which the proof was derived ultimately rest on human intuition.»

On your last sentence, by the understanding of the teachings of jesus, none of these so called disciples are good enough for all show a peity low wanting of love from jesus towards themselves more so then the next man... lust!

It is not the mission of the church to preach and teach about love and grace all the time (although it happens A LOT now because people just don't seem to understand or get the message the first time they hear it, or the second time, or the third, and they don't involve themselves with the word of God enough) because people need to be founded on meat.