Thanks to the IPKat blog I've become aware of an official response by the UK Government to a member of parliament (liberal democrat Dr. Julian Huppert, from Cambridge) who asked a question about what measures would be taken to
ensure judicial independence at the EPO.
To guarantee the right to an independent and impartial judiciary, the law in Canada has constitutional protections or «essential conditions» that
ensure judicial independence.
Romania: According to this article, Romania also has serious issues to
ensure judicial independence:
Not exact matches
It's also meant to
ensure it doesn't «give the appearance of compromising
judicial impartiality and
independence (including
independence from the political process)» while keeping a judge from taking a position on issues that might ultimately wind up before the courts, he argues in the memo.
Judicial independence is obviously a bedrock of our legal system, required to
ensure the autonomy and function of the courts without outside interference.
In short,
judicial independence ensures that judges are free from external pressure and influence.
However, if the principle of complementarity is to be applied, states must
ensure that their own
judicial systems and trials are consistent with international standards of
independence and fairness, the ICC must be willing to actively support, embrace, and implement the principle, and the international community must provide the financial, technical, and professional resources that many struggling states need in this endeavour.
Through its commitment to
judicial independence and impartiality, and its efforts to
ensure access to justice, it stands today as one of the primary bastions of the rule of law in Quebec.
According to the government's press release: «He [Geoff Cowper] will identify the top issues that are affecting the public's access to timely justice and what can be done to
ensure the efficiencies already underway have the desired impacts while respecting the
independence of the
judicial system.»
As to the role of the lord chancellor, the committee says this is central to the maintenance of
judicial independence and the rule of law: «Prime Ministers must therefore
ensure that they continue to appoint to the post candidates of sufficient status and seniority» (HL, para 71).