The mere fact that
judicial oversight remains in place can
ensure continued adherence to implementation of stated policy goals, and actual interventions should be rare, especially if it is clearly understood that all the courts would be enforcing are the state's own policy goals.
Walker says political leadership, internal procedures, media
oversight, and public pressure are all necessary to
ensure civil liberties, but that
judicial oversight is extremely important as well, and that Scalia misused his scholarship to imply that Walker supports a diminishing role for the courts.