Not exact matches
The investigation found out that the root cause of the accident was moisture in the air -
data sensors: heavy, lashing rains caused moisture to
enter skin - flush air -
data sensors that gave
wrong inputs to the flight - control computers.
We would be
wrong if we did not say that our
data reveal these to be aspects of the decision to
enter D. Min.
Enter Mr. Mann, who suggested that both the history books and other historical temperature
data were
wrong.
Don't get me
wrong I know the
data entered into the model is intense and has to bear a lot of scrutiny but with hackers and binary knowledge of computers there is no way I could be convinced that a model couldn't be manipulated by an Expert Programmer.
An interesting question is this: Suppose we
enter a Maunder - type minimum, but temperatures do not fall into Little - Ice - Age territory, would you then 1) discount the Sun or 2) say the
data is
wrong, made - up, manipulated, impossible, etc or 3) admit that the Sun is not a major driver, but still a minor player
Maybe I'm
wrong, and the members of the National Academy of Sciences, the leadership of the American Geophysical Union, etc. are all deluded, and the people that publish papers in professional scientific journals are frauds, and I make up
data and
enter it into my computer in my sleep while preparing my work for publication.
If correcting the
data requires any premium changes (such as
entered wrong age), please also mention that you authorize the insurance company to charge you (or credit you) the difference.