Sentences with phrase «entertaining character in the film»

He's the most entertaining character in the film.

Not exact matches

While I find Shrek the Third to be entertaining enough to give it a pass in this regard, I fear for the future of the series, as now they've gotten even further away from the Grimm Fairy Tales / Disney world that the previous films spoofed, opening up the series to legendary characters and other tales of adventure.

In his desire to make a universally well - received film, Walt Disney decided to play safe with this light - hearted and hugely entertaining delight that would hardly not please everyone, with an expressive animation, great catchy songs and many adorable characters.

All in all, though, we don't fall in love with any of these characters, we don't root for the film's one «couple» (who we think all along will unrealistically be granted a predictable Hollywood ending), we can't remember the jokes after the fact and, most important, we aren't consistently entertained.

Even thought the film is light on character development, and strove to be more of a pure action film (one of the most influential and parodied in fact), it is still entertaining, even though it's really just ok, and not all that good (unbelievable and unrealistic action aside).

If nothing else, the film is pretty entertaining, and when dramatic highlights come into play, glimpses into what could have been sparks brightly enough to help endear, maybe not thoroughly enough for the final product to reward, but decidedly enough to hold a fair deal of your attention in this improvable character study.

Mischievously entertaining... Dahl's film has character in oversupply even if its actual characters are sometimes thin.

Despite its shortcomings, the film entertains those who have investment in all of these characters because, honestly, the valiant, cliff - hanging final moments depend on it.

The only reason my rating is so high is the fact that I never expected it to be as good as it was, It come as quite a surprise how funny it was, Ice Cube basically plays the same character that made his role in the Jump Street films so good, It's nothing new but it's full of cheap laughs from start to finish and the fight at the end was pretty entertaining, Yes it's predictable but it's allot of fun.

the actors all did there part in this film, and the result is pretty entertaining, with an entertaining twist on the story of red riding hood, the reason why i enjoy the film is how each of the stories are linked by the telling of each story told by each character

The film is loaded with seedy and dysfunctional characters of questionable morals and intelligence, which makes things entertaining in a train - wreck sort of way, but it leaves nobody to root for.

That said, it remains a colourful and entertaining film, boosted by the humour provided by Robin Williams's character (which has been imitated in virtually every Disney animation since, with ever - decreasing levels of success).

And any time spent thinking about how ridiculous what they're actually talking about is, is still more entertaining than some of the antics the supporting characters get up to, be it John Malkovich trying to kung fu a robot or a former Special Forces soldier complaining stress or all the running he was having to do, or dear God anything having to do with Sam's parents who offer nothing to the film but reminders why they shouldn't be in it.

That Let's Go to Prison remains fairly entertaining throughout is clearly due in no small part to their efforts, and it's hard to entirely dismiss any film that features a character singing along (quite badly, no less) to Technotronic's «Move This.»

While I can't say the film dazzles, it does entertain and it brings the characters / situations to life in a fairly satisfying manner.

And although the CGI clearly was made in a different era, it was still a very entertaining film that not only had moments of tension, but also an emotional charge thanks to Robin Williams and his character.

We went on riff on the psychology of the characters in THE LAST WORD, muse on making an entertaining film with substance, and the legacy of the women's movement.

Speaking of dark characters, pound for pound many of the most entertaining films in the festival are the ones with film noir roots.

Looper is not your average science fiction film; it understands the importance of character development and that explosions do not need to occur every five minutes in order to be entertaining.

But the 2011 film, while flawed in many ways, proved surprisingly entertaining and teed up both its title character and his villainous brother Loki for a return appearance in the team - up movie «The Avengers,» which turned out to be an absolute megahit.

Spun in the rolling yarn of a book the nuance might make for an entertaining read, but in a film it lacks the narrative structure and shape, not to mention the lack of interesting characters, that makes for a truly compelling viewing.

The characters in this film are compelling and entertaining and because of them and the choice to use the shrinking aspect of the story as a jumpboard rather than an isolated boat with nowhere to go, this allows a very human story to shine through an unrealistic story mechanism.

That said roles are so swiftly identifiable to the viewer is, in part, the principal triumph of this vastly entertaining and laudably generous film: lesbian, liberal or otherwise, we can all see ourselves in these characters, sometimes unflatteringly so.

Any number of terrible incidents this year have demonstrated why that was horseshit, but the lightness of touch in which Simien approaches his thorny subject - matter, and the complexity and compassion with which he writes his characters (brilliantly played by an excellent ensemble) made the film as entertaining as it was thought - provoking.

Carla not only has some of the only entertaining solo scenes in the film, but she's also instrumental in some of its best comedic moments - including a slow - motion dodgeball fight between all the film's parental and kid characters that comes at the end of an already entertaining sequence set within a SkyZone trampoline park.

Though the late - 19th century setting of Jules Verne's Around the World in 80 Days is an important character (and perhaps the most important one), the book has a kind of timeless, universal appeal that made a film version in the»50s relevant and entertaining and could make a new adaptation feel the same.

When what is left unexplored leaves us wondering why we should care about the characters, as in Jersey Boys and Think Like a Man Too, then we have films that may entertain at fleeting intervals, but which cease to resonate beyond the time spent watching them.

This character provides the film's narration (the first time Anderson has ever used narration in a movie), which sometimes feels out of place but other times is entertaining and insightful as it reflects the characters» feelings and situations.

One of the problems with the film, which held true in the 1980s, when the G.I. Joe franchise entertained kids through TV cartoon shows and comic books, is that there are too many characters vying for too little screen time.

He values that we care about his characters first and foremost, so when the action and other, more familiar and entertaining elements arrive in his films, the audience is so invested (if the film is working) that you can't imagine losing them.

The unfortunate trade - off is that the logistics of Ragnarok's script dictate that with Blanchett and Hopkins on Asgard, Hemsworth (and lots of the film's most entertaining side characters) on Sakaar, and Hiddleston on Sakaar but in a different setting, the film's best players hardly get to play off each other.

It's a recipe that provides an entertaining experience, but the dramatic moments depend perhaps too much on character and plot from previous films, so that they lose a great deal of punch if viewers haven't seen The Maze Runner or The Scorch Trials in some time - or at all.

Otherwise, this was often a fun and entertaining track that discussed experiences during the film and thoughts about characters; most of the actors played fairly small roles in the movie, so it was interesting to hear them provide additional remarks about their personae.

Moreover, the film is based on a true story but that does not necessarily mean it works as a two hour motion picture; the story of what happened behind the scenes is interesting but because Affleck's character doesn't actually do anything which translates to a thrilling experience at the cinema (despite it being brave nonetheless), it leads the film to disappoint in the final third, which should be its most entertaining.