He really does appear to believe that
the entire climate debate can be summed up by a sort of on / off proposition.
It is highly unlikely that this will render
the entire climate debate over and done.
The entire phase space of
the entire climate debate is wrong.
But the «97 per cent» claim is one of the most widely debunked fallacies in
the entire climate debate.
Rational discussion of the evidence for that covert policy and of its objective is arguably the largest black hole in
the entire climate debate.
Not exact matches
The
entire focus of the
climate debate is now shifting towards the question of how the required emission reductions can be achieved quickly enough.
My understanding of most of the (lets call it) skeptical positions from people like Roy Spencer is that they essentially claim exactly that: the absence of a large signal compared to noise (or natural variability) and the
entire debate is essentially about the question, whether noise is a measurement / statistical problem or the very nature of
climate itself?
And though it was Mr. McConnell who insisted that the
entire bill be read aloud (as punishment, he said, for Mr. Reid's breaking a deal on judicial nominees) the Republican leader also said he hoped for a lengthy, perhaps weeks - long,
debate on the
climate change measure to highlight its flaws.
As I've said elsewhere, I think you're rather naive when it comes to the
entire so - called «
climate debate.»
Since science is still
debated, in a
climate of intimidation, monopoly despite having been told a long time ago that it was settled, force is to admit that the
entire pyramidal scheme that was supposedly backed up by AGW science has no foundation.
Climate Depot was at the forefront of breaking the ClimateGate scandal that rocked the
entire global warming
debate.
Latimer, I'm not sure why you assume my responding to you means I am duty - bound to engage you in
debate on the
entire corpus of
climate research.
As we
debate our
entire national commitment to
climate change action through the proxy of an oil sands pipeline project or two, we should remember every one of us has had a hand in getting the bitumen into that pipe.
«If you put someone in who doesn't believe in
climate change and sees no urgency to fight against human - related
climate change, you then skew the
entire debate,» said New Democratic Party member of Parliament Nathan Cullen.
In the
entire climate change
debate the impacts to air have dominated, with water not having featured as a critical medium of impact.
In the
entire climate change talks over the years blue carbon was relegated to the background, only last year was the significance of blue carbon put on the marginal agenda and is now shaping specific fora and
debate so as to assign priority significance to blue carbon sinks.
The
entire global warming (I refuse to call it
climate change)
debate is descending to the level of philosophers arguing how many angels can dance on the head of a pin.
Though governments around the globe and the
entire climate science community are discussing and
debating the «option» of geoengineering (never admitting to the rationally inarguable fact that geoengineering has been going on for decades), the question of fallout contamination from SRM aerosol spraying is never even mentioned by our so called scientists.
Given the major environmental, jobs and energy security questions that have been raised about Keystone XL, and the fact that President Obama can take a stand for the environment on this issue without the usual (and fully tedious) Congressional
debate, if he does in fact approve it, it certainly calls into question his
entire environmental platform — if how he handled the
climate change
debate in 2009 didn't already.
ROT might be applicable to scientific studies, but the
climate debate is about competing assessments of the
entire body of scientific literature.
What I am talking about is, that it seems to me that with regard to
climate science, this blog spends far too much time responding to the phony, trumped - up «
debate» fueled by denialist drivel, and not enough time addressing the legitimate scientific question as to whether it is in fact too late to prevent global warming and
climate change that will be catastrophic to human civilization, not to mention the
entire Earth's biosphere.
«This
entire process has been an exercise in re-educating myself about the
climate debate and, in the process, I can honestly say that I have heard very convincing arguments from all the different sides, and I think I'm actually more neutral on the issue now than I was before I started this project.
About the only person I can see in the
entire debate that we can make a direct comparison with algore to, is our smut - writing,
climate scare profiting friend at the IPCC, Pachy.