The entire passage reads, «In spite of the many kinds of love, which in Greek are designated as philia (friendship), eros (aspiration toward value), and epithymia (desire), in addition to agape, which is the creation of the Spirit, there is one point of identity in all these qualities of love, which justifies the translation of them all by «love»; and that identity is the «urge toward the reunion of the separated,» which is the inner dynamics of life.
Not exact matches
I suppose it would be important to
read the
entire book of Galatians so that we can see where Paul is going with the specific
passage you cited.
You have to
read the
entire passage and also compare that verse with other related verses to
read it exegetically.
There, for an
entire week, they would meet in the morning, somebody would
read a
passage from the Scripture, and then one of the priests would explain it, verse by verse, line by line.
... Thinking that I have here the
entire poem, to my chagrin I learn that it is but an imperfect copy that I possess and have
read, that my ancestors have torn out many of the first leaves and grandest
passages, and mutilated it in many places.
If one would take the time to
read the
entire chapter or context of the
passage, they would find there is no error.
So like I said, try actually
reading the
entire passage in context before you quote something that you clearly have ZERO knowledge of.
Come on
READ the
entire passage instead of trying to mine what you want out of it, and again interpreting what YOU want it to say.
Below are the sermon notes for how I preached this
passages about 20 years ago... If you
read through it, please note that I disagree with what I say about «salvation,» with what I say about prayer, Bible study, and church attendance, and what I say about the overall point of the
entire passage of Ephesians 2.
«1 His message is even more profound if you
read the rest of the
passage, «For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the
entire world... «2 These words are even truer today than when he first said them in 1929.
An
entire year's worth of
reading comprehension and fluency
passages!
Later in the week, students completed a graphic organizer that helped them synthesize the concepts they learned while
reading the
entire passage.
Only after you've
read the
entire manuscript should you go back to the
passages you feel could use a rewrite.
The
entire speech makes for an interesting and encouraging
read, and here are a few
passages that really caught my eye (including the reference to the coming National Summit mentioned in the post title):
Having already
read through the
entire opinion in order to highlight the pertinent
passages for my judge, there seems to be lots of good «practical» explanation in the opinion, which should provide some additional guidance to district judges — guidance that is certainly lacking under many circumstances.
I have seen other
passages from Lisa's book and would love to
read the
entire book.