The Crown's case at trial was based
entirely on circumstantial evidence — Cst.
U.S. District Court Judge Valerie Caproni has noted throughout the trial that the government's case is built almost
entirely on circumstantial evidence, and her instructions to the jury will go a long way in determining how jurors come to assess Silver.
Not exact matches
«[In the absence of] any direct
evidence of conspiracy, the government's complaint is necessarily based
entirely on the little
circumstantial evidence it was able to locate during its extensive investigation,
on which it piles innuendo
on top of innuendo, stretches facts and implies actions that did not occur and Macmillan denies unequivocally.»
The government, said Macmillan's response (pdf), found a «lack of direct
evidence of conspiracy», and its complaint is therefore «based
entirely on the little
circumstantial evidence it was able to locate during its extensive investigation,
on which it piles innuendo
on top of innuendo, stretches facts and implies actions that did not occur and which Macmillan denies unequivocally».
The appellant states the case against him is based «
entirely»
on circumstantial evidence.
They may build a «logic» based
on the irrelevant and
entirely circumstantial evidence and ultimately construct a delusion system to protect themselves from unbearable reality.»