That he was the son of god is an
entirely different matter, one totally
up for debate and not at all an historical fact.
The truth about Judith Curry, as I see it, is that she has a strong attraction
for political dialogue, and refuses to see that the public
debate over climate is fundamentally at odds with good science, as is the IPCC - sponsored «consensus» of climate alarmism, or in her case, of climate political - worryism (she seems deeply attached to helping bring about «reasonable» and «responsible» climate policies — whereas my view is that any and all such climate policies, now, are necessarily based upon incompetent, false science, are
entirely the wrong thing to try to impose upon the people of the world, and need to be summarily thrown out, before one can even begin to have a dispassionate, competent scientific dialogue — as opposed to the political
debate now being served
up — on the state of climate science.).