Sentences with phrase «entities on breaches»
Conducted a number of internal investigations for corporate entities on breaches of corporate governance and fraud.
http://www.shlegal.com/ Not exact matches
- Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing material that is obscene, racist, homophobic or sexist or that contains any form of hate speech; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that infringe copyright; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are illegal, libellous, defamatory or may prejudice ongoing legal proceedings or breach a court injunction or other order; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages that are abusive, threatening or make any form of personal attack on another user or an employee of Packaging Europe magazine; - Post Messages in any language other than English; - Post the same Message, or a very similar Message, repeatedly; - Post or otherwise publish any Messages unrelated to the Forum or the Forum's topic; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages containing any form of advertising or promotion for goods and services or any chain Messages or «spam»; - Post, link to or otherwise publish any Messages with recommendations to buy or refrain from buying a particular security or which contain confidential information of another party or which otherwise have the purpose of affecting the price or value of any security; - Disguise the origin of any Messages; - Impersonate any person or entity (including Packaging Europe magazine employees or Forum guests or hosts) or misrepresent any affiliation with any person or entity; - Post or transmit any Messages that contain software viruses, files or code designed to interrupt, destroy or limit the functionality of the Site or any computer software or equipment, or any other harmful component; - Collect or store other users» personal data; and / or - Restrict or inhibit any other user from using the Forums.
The state entity that has the authority to investigate any alleged breaches of that statute is the Joint Commission on Public Ethics, or JCOPE.
Corporate Veil Smith's attorneys initially argued that much of what Smith was being sued for was outside of the scope of the home inspection, but as the case progressed they began to lean heavily on the argument that as a corporate officer, Smith should not be liable for the contract breach of SHI, the corporate entity, and consequently was not accountable for the alleged mistakes.
You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services, the Sites or any Materials therein to take any actions that: (i) infringe on PetSmart Charities» or any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual or proprietary rights, or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, constitute discrimination based on race, religion, ethnicity, gender, sex, disability or other protected grounds, or are pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on PetSmart Charities or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices, or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate any applicable «anti-spam» legislation, including that commonly referred to as «CASL»; (vii) would be or encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, national or international laws or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interference with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of PetSmart Charities» or another party's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other account users or attempt to gain access to other account users» accounts or otherwise mine information about other account users or the Sites, or interfere with any other user's ability to access or use the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) in PetSmart Charities» sole discretion, are contrary to PetSmart Charities» public image, goodwill, reputation or mission, or otherwise not in furtherance of our Vision of a lifelong, loving home for every pet.
You will not, and will not allow or authorize others to, use the Services or the Sites to take any actions that: (i) infringe on any third party's copyright, patent, trademark, trade secret or other proprietary rights or rights of publicity or privacy; (ii) violate any applicable law, statute, ordinance or regulation (including those regarding export control); (iii) are defamatory, trade libelous, threatening, harassing, invasive of privacy, stalking, harassment, abusive, tortuous, hateful, discriminatory based on race, ethnicity, gender, sex or disability, pornographic or obscene; (iv) interfere with or disrupt any services or equipment with the intent of causing an excessive or disproportionate load on the Animal League or its licensors or suppliers» infrastructure; (v) involve knowingly distributing viruses, Trojan horses, worms, or other similar harmful or deleterious programming routines; (vi) involve the preparation and / or distribution of «junk mail», «spam», «chain letters», «pyramid schemes» or other deceptive online marketing practices or any unsolicited bulk email or unsolicited commercial email or otherwise in a manner that violate the Controlling the Assault of Non-Solicited Pornography and Marketing Act (CAN - SPAM Act of 2003); (vii) would encourage conduct that could constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any applicable local, state, federal or international laws, rules or regulations; (viii) involve the unauthorized entry to any machine accessible via the Services or interfere with the Sites or any servers or networks connected to the Sites or disobey any requirements, procedures, policies or regulations of networks connected to the Sites, or attempt to breach the security of or disrupt Internet communications on the Sites (including without limitation accessing data to which you are not the intended recipient or logging into a server or account for which you are not expressly authorized); (ix) impersonate any person or entity, including, without limitation, one of the Animal League's or other's officers or employees, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity; (x) forge headers or otherwise manipulate identifiers in order to disguise the origin of any information transmitted through the Sites; (xi) collect or store personal data about other Animal League members, Site users or attempt to gain access to other Animal League members information, or otherwise mine information about Animal League members, Site users, or the Sites; (xii) execute any form of network monitoring or run a network analyzer or packet sniffer or other technology to intercept, decode, mine or display any packets used to communicate between the Sites» servers or any data not intended for you; (xiii) attempt to circumvent authentication or security of any content, host, network or account («cracking») on or from the Sites; or (xiv) are contrary to the Animal League's public image, goodwill, reputation or mission or otherwise not in furtherance of the Animal Leagues stated purposes.
TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, EMIRATES EXCLUDES ALL LIABILITY TO ANY MEMBER OR OTHER ENTITY OR PERSON OF WHATSOEVER NATURE IN RESPECT OF ANY NEGLIGENCE, WILFUL MISCONDUCT, POOR SERVICE OR OTHER BREACH OF OBLIGATION OUT OF THE PROVISION OR FAILURE TO PROVIDE THE SERVICES BY OR ON BEHALF OF A SUPPLIER OR PARTNER ARISING OUT OF THAT LEGAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE SUPPLIER OR PARTNER.
On the charge of dormant Commerce Clause breach, the judges found the plaintiffs» argument failed to show how out - of - state nuclear plants were suffering from ZEC implementation and that coal and gas - fired generators» interests are not protected under the Clause as non-nuclear entities.
Or, to put it another way, is the ban on law firms hiving off unreserved legal work through associated entities the regulatory breach in the profession's defences that will enable those new entrants to storm a newly liberalised legal services market?
A U.S. court would allow a lawsuit to go forward in its courts if one of two main exceptions apply (there are other exceptions which are controversial and much less common and inapplicable on the facts of this question): (1) there is a breach of contract duly authorized by the national government, or (2) the liability arises from the non-governmental «commercial activities» of a governmental entity owned by the national government but not truly a part of it.
The cases allege breaches of contract and violations of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO) Act with respect to USF's receipt of promotional allowances from suppliers and certain entities that purchased products on USF's behalf.
An acquisition, access, use or disclosure of PHI in violation of the Privacy Rule is now presumed to be a breach — requiring notification to the individual, to HHS, and, in some instances, to the media — unless the covered entity or business associate can demonstrate that there is a low probability that the PHI has been compromised based on a risk assessment that must include consideration of certain factors.
In case of a data breach, business associates must follow guidelines on disclosure, such as notifying the covered entity.
We focus both on commercial, typically contractual disputes between business entities, as well as on investor / state arbitrations in cases of expropriation or other breaches of bilateral investment treaties.
We counsel healthcare providers and other covered entities on HIPAA and state privacy law compliance, breach response, crisis management, and regulatory investigations and audits.
However, for certain crimes (including insider trading and market manipulation), quasi-criminal sanctions — that, for breaches of securities law, include monetary sanctions and confiscation of the profits arising from the breach — may be imposed on legal entities under Legislative Decree No. 231/2001.
A covered entity's breach notification obligations differ based on whether the breach affects 500 or more individuals or fewer than 500 individuals.
(1) extending negligent misrepresentation beyond «business transactions» to product liability, unprecedented in Texas; (2) ignoring multiple US Supreme Court decisions that express and implied preemption operate independently (as discussed here) to dismiss implied preemption with nothing more than a cite to the Medtronic v. Lohr express preemption decision; (3) inventing some sort of state - law tort to second - guess the defendant following one FDA marketing approach (§ 510k clearance) over another (pre-market approval), unprecedented anywhere; (4) holding that the learned intermediary rule does not apply whenever a defendant «compensates» or «incentivizes» physicians to use its products, absent any Texas state or appellate authority; (5) imposing strict liability on an entity not in the product's chain of sale, contrary to Texas statute (§ 82.001 (2)-RRB-; (6) creating a claim for «tortious interference» with the physician - patient relationship, again utterly unprecedented; (7) creating «vicarious» breach of fiduciary duty for engaging doctors to serve as expert witnesses in mass tort litigation also involving their patients, ditto; and (8) construing a consulting agreement with a physician as «commercial bribery» to avoid the Texas cap on punitive damages, jaw - droppingly unprecedented.
NEW DELHI (Sputnik)- The Indian Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology sent on Wednesday a notice to Facebook, asking the latter to clarify if the personal information of Indian citizens had been misused by the Cambridge Analytica firm or any other downstream entity and provide more details on the personal data breach.