I HAVE changed my lifestyle in relation to
the enviro issues I actually believe.
Topics of the latest reports, published by the Federation of American Scientists, include Arctic changes, mountaintop mining controversies, pollution control law enforcement, climate change, midnight rulemaking, scientific papers / security risks, oil sands
enviro issues, and fracking / drinking water.
Not exact matches
Enviro - activists believe they are headed toward the light at the end of the tunnel on the man - caused global warming
issue with this growing collection of lawsuits against fossil fuel companies.
enviro - activists who could see their beloved
issue dying at the hands of skeptic scientists» detailed climate assessments if nothing was done to stop them.
To quash the notion that no valid scientific criticism exists against the idea of man - caused global warming,
enviro - activists often say «denier scientists» are paid by the fossil fuel industry to lie about the
issue, insinuating a parallel to expert «shills» who did the same for «big tobacco».
For over two decades, both the overall
enviro - activist community and the mainstream media have had what amounts to nearly absolute control over framing the public narrative about the global warming
issue.
*... To refresh the raison d'être of the EPA & UN...... To move environmentalism from the fringes to the center of social concern...... To justify increased media coverage of environmental
issues...... To give
enviro - groups a powerful fund - raising and consciousness - raising tool...... and allow them access to the levers of national and international power...... To give activist & green parties a vote - getting wedge
issue...... and a case - study justification for their habitual «hammer» (increased regulation and taxation)...... To provide at - a-loss «engagé / enragé» types with a new stick with which to bash the beastly bourgeoise...... To transfer wealth from the West to the South...... To fund alternative energy developers and researchers...
This is not something I found at some «denialist» source, it's in point of fact in a paper, referenced in the Central Park thread, that was
issued by an NYC
enviro mitigation group.
Enviro group advertising focused almost exclusively on the need for climate action or cap and trade specifically, industry associations advertised on a range of
issues including cap and trade with the Chamber spending heavily on health care.
Various entities have been losing the global warming
issue war for many years, succumbing to
enviro - activist pressure to offer, at minimum, some kind of politically correct capitulation about how human activity is responsible for the warming.
The
enviro advocacy groups saw the climate change
issue as an opportunity to enlist scientific support for their preferred energy policy solution.
Last month he
issued a draft climate bill that, though tougher than
enviros were expecting from his committee, appeared likely to be more lenient in practice than other proposals floating around the Hill.
thus, it's reasonable to assume he had not expressed a public opinion about
issue after his retirement or showed any inclination to become a sudden noisy
enviro - activist.
Like the more daring Israel - based green group who plays with civil disobedience once and while, Green Action, Heschel's
enviro teachings are intricately intertwined with social
issues - which are ones that no one can ignore in this densely populated country.