Sentences with phrase «environmental agency rejected»

Katko, R - Camillus, said he's «disappointed» the state's environmental agency rejected a water quality certificate which is required for the Constitution pipeline project.

Not exact matches

In 2001 residents rejected a buyout offer from the Environmental Protection Agency, which has declared the canyon one of the most contaminated reaches of the Coeur d'Alene basin.

The Environmental Protection Agency, which must approve or reject the standard, should unambiguously reject it.

Today, the federal Environmental Protection Agency's Region 2 office rejected the diversion of $ 481m of these dedicated clean water funds, while approving $ 29.1 m.

ELIZABETHTOWN The omnibus government spending bill passed by Congress and signed by the president last month rejects deep cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and fully funds the agency at 2017 spending lAgency (EPA) and fully funds the agency at 2017 spending lagency at 2017 spending levels.

But she has also been criticized on her environmental record, including her vote to reject Environmental Protection Agency carbon limits for coal - fueled power plants, a chief cause of acid rain in the Adienvironmental record, including her vote to reject Environmental Protection Agency carbon limits for coal - fueled power plants, a chief cause of acid rain in the AdiEnvironmental Protection Agency carbon limits for coal - fueled power plants, a chief cause of acid rain in the Adirondack Park.

The US Environmental Protection Agency did reject most of the loan request since it was going to be used for basic construction rather than cleaning water or helping the environment.

An attempt to use $ 511 million from a clean water fund to pay ongoing costs was rejected by the federal Environmental Protection Agency; the Cuomo administration is appealing that denial.

The federal Environmental Protection Agency ultimately rejected most of the loan request because it was going to be used for basic construction rather than cleaning water or helping the environment.

In September, President Obama rejected new air pollution standards proposed by the Environmental Protection Agency.

ScienceInsider reported this week that the U.S. Senate rejected a resolution last week that would have blocked the Environmental Protection Agency from regulating carbon dioxide emissions based on its finding that they endanger human health, among other stories.

Trump's draconian budget request — which suggested drastic cuts to the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), among others — was rejected by Congress, and a spending bill that increases funding for science at many federal agencies was signed into law.

After 1 year of deliberations, the Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forest, and Landscape rejected the trial, saying that Sautter had failed to prove that it posed no environmental threat.

Former Education Secretary Arne DuncanArne Starkey DuncanObama Education secretary mocks Pruitt over staff raises Parkland survivors talk gun violence with Chicago high schoolers Trump administration is putting profits over students MORE mocked Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott PruittEdward (Scott) Scott PruittTrump signs order to boost efficiency in federal agencies Overnight Energy: EPA moves to roll back chemical plant safety rule NASA chief says humans contribute to climate change Pruitt gets outside lawyer Trump officials propose easing EPA chemical plant safety rule MORE on Friday over reports that the EPA chief directed staff to approve sizable raises for two top aides even after the White House rejected their applications for pay increases.

When an economist at the Environmental Protection Agency rejected the Obama administration's stance on global warming by writing an unsolicited report challenging the scientific consensus on greenhouse dangers, groups fighting restrictions on greenhouse gases hailed him as a courageous maverick.

The state's environmental agency staff recommended approval of the permit for the power plant, but Governor Sebelius, apparently attempting to bolster her green cred nationally, pressured the appointed head of the agency to reject the permits.

These uncertainties are exploited by those — such as Myron Ebell, head of Donald Trump's Environmental Protection Agency transition team — who reject the broad scientific consensus that humans are warming the Earth.

Motor vehicles emissions of greenhouse gases came to the fore in 1999, but the Environmental Protection agency rejected 19 organisations» petitions for regulate In 2007, the tide turned and now the EPA is required to act.

Activists will supposedly converge on U.S. Senate offices and demand that their senators «reject Donald Trump's reckless climate - denying cabinet nominees» particularly secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson, Environmental Protection Agency administrator Scott Pruitt, and Energy secretary pick Rick Perry (if you're not sure what a denier is, I just wrote about it here for The Hill).

On June 26, 2012, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals rejected 26 separate requests by various states and industry groups to overturn the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) greenhouse gas regulations.

Last August, a U.S. federal appeals court rejected an Environmental Protection Agency rule that would have required manufacturers to replace HFCs with more climate - friendly substitutes, saying the agency lacks the regulatory authority to compel companies to make the sAgency rule that would have required manufacturers to replace HFCs with more climate - friendly substitutes, saying the agency lacks the regulatory authority to compel companies to make the sagency lacks the regulatory authority to compel companies to make the switch.

According to a series of emails obtained by a non-governmental organization, the director of EPA's National Center for Environmental Economics (NCEE) refused to consider the report, and rejected a request to forward the report to agency officials tasked with analyzing the science behind the endangerment finding.

The Environmental Protection Agency ruled that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmEnvironmental Protection Agency ruled that new power plants are not required to install technology to reduce carbon dioxide emissions, rejecting an argument from environmentalenvironmental groups.

California sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency in January after it rejected the state's 2005 request for a rule waiver to enact its own tailpipe emissions standards.

Environmental Protection Agency throws out attacks on regulation of greenhouse gases The EPA on July 29, 2010 rejected 10 petitions from contrarian organizations... More»