Sentences with phrase «environmental harm as»

More farming, however, usually means more environmental harm as a result of clearing land, burning fossil fuels, consuming water for irrigation and spreading fertilizer.

Since the storm hit, Puerto Rico's 3.3 million residents have been forced to endure an agonizingly slow power restoration effort, suffering health and environmental harms as bureaucracy, logistical difficulties, and potential corruption hampered progress.

Not exact matches

McMillan said initiatives including the recently proposed replacements of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and the National Energy Board are harming Canada's reputation as a transparent and fair place to do business.

For instance, as technological innovations become more able to create economic benefits while minimizing, if not eliminating, environmental harm, the integrated web of global economic relationships may help to hasten the process of global «greening.»

They evaluate such things as what kind of tax will do the least harm, or what environmental - protection measures will least impede economic growth.

«We saw scores fall across the board for each of the legislative conferences based on a variety of factors, including the lack of action on bills most critical to our environmental health, as well as an increase in the passage of bills that actually do harm to New York's environment,» explained Executive Director Rob Moore.

His agenda, particularly dismantling the Environmental Protection Agency, as well as rolling back climate and public health protections that New Yorkers benefit from, disproportionately harms low - income communities of color.

Environmental harm remains a big concern as the tidal industry develops, and U.S. regulators require testing to insure that such turbines don't pose a threat to marine life.

Among many others, Ted's current projects include serving as science director for the Collaborative on Health and Environment (CHE) and active participation in the Health Care Without Harm coalition, contributing to its international campaign to improve the environmental performance of hospitals and other healthcare institutions.

These mutations can be caused by multiple events, some from normal cellular activities and some from environmental harm, such as UV light or chemicals.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

Don't miss this exploratory review by one of IFM's most well - received instructors, Robert Rountree, MD, as he tackles the challenging subject of how long - term exposure to low levels of multiple, commonly encountered environmental chemicals and heavy metals can be harming our health.

Julie has learned that children with autism are the «canaries in the coalmine,» informing us that we have too many toxins and nutrient deficiency that have affected our genetic expression, as well as exposure to environmental triggers that are harming the development of our children as well as our health.

Environmental toxins such as plastics, plasticizers, industrial chemicals (PCBs, dioxin, benzene) are known endocrine disruptors, can cause brain imbalances such as seizures, and can harm the fetus and cause miscarriages.

In fact, any assault on the stratum corneum — either from external damage or as a result of cellular water loss — can lead to sensitized and dehydrated skin that is susceptible to environmental harm, dryness, irritation, breakouts, sagging skin and other signs of aging.

As it stands now, green can mean a number of things — being organic, using natural ingredients, or avoiding environmental or consumer harm as much as possible during the manufacturing and use of the producAs it stands now, green can mean a number of things — being organic, using natural ingredients, or avoiding environmental or consumer harm as much as possible during the manufacturing and use of the producas much as possible during the manufacturing and use of the producas possible during the manufacturing and use of the product.

We need to be, and to be perceived as, an industry with a moral imperative, and being a conduit for this kind of reckless environmental harm is reprehensible.

Our aim is for you to experience your great white shark breaching or cage diving trip in a natural environment, putting sharks first with our «first do not harm approach», and managing our environmental footprint as much as possible.

Because I don't know enough science to debate contrarians scientifically, I usually fall back on: Suppose the mainstream climate scientists are wrong & the contrarians right, and we act as if the scientists are right, then we have nothing to lose & something to gain in terms of reducing other environmental harms (acid rain, local pollution), resource depletion, and increasing national security (re oil wars & protection), and lots of money to save from energy / resource efficiency & conservation, and increasing from alternative energy.

Or the economically concerned, who fear environmental actions will harm economic sufficiency (jobs) or wealth — as if the environment were totally unnecessary to human life & well - being.

While my colleague Tom Friedman has taken to calling green the new red, white and blue, the people at this conference clearly see environmental marketing as a source of, well, good old - fashioned green, in the form of profits (that they say don't harm the planet).

Whereas, if left unaddressed, the consequences of a changing climate have the potential to adversely impact all Americans, hitting vulnerable populations hardest, harming productivity in key economic sectors such as construction, agriculture, and tourism, saddling future generations with costly economic and environmental burdens, and imposing additional costs on State and Federal budgets that will further add to the long - term fiscal challenges that we face as a Nation;

The Environmental Protection Agency is justified in taking action under the Clean Air Act, as it has so often before, to protect Americans from the harms posed by air pollution.

Across the country, Sierra Club activists have been raising their voices about a «free trade» scheme that would do more environmental harm than help if it's pushed through the finish line as - is.

Kajir has served as chief executive officer of the Environmental Law Centre in Port Moresby and was the lead attorney in a Supreme Court case aimed at stopping foreign timber companies» large - scale, illegal deforestation practices, often accompanied by threats of harm to local landholders who dare to challenge them.

Kenya's elephants could be among the animals harmed by harsh new laws to hamstring the programs of international environmental groups such as the Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) and World Wide...

Nine environmental areas were listed in the denial of the water permit as being exposed to «significant and unavoidable harm.»

Economists studying taxes on environmental harms, such as carbon emissions, often suggest that the tax be set according to the damage inflicted by the last unit of emissions.

Unlike all the other strategies outlined in the book, Criswell's lunar solar power is (at least according to him) scalable and affordable enough to not only meet all world energy needs as currently projected, but to allow for significant expansion in global world product without environmental harm.

Public policies that protect against environmental harms are listed as a business risk, i.e. a threat to their basic business model.

This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and many other legal theories including tort law.

This strong ethical and moral responsibility is derivable both from the universally accepted moral principles including the widely accepted golden rule which requires people to treat others as they wish to be treated, and international law including, but not limited to: (a) the «no harm» rule which is a widely recognized principle of customary international law whereby a State is duty - bound to prevent, reduce and control the risk of environmental harm to other states, and a rule agreed to by all nations in the preamble to the UNFCCC, (b) the «polluter - pays principle» agreed to by almost all nations in the 1992 Rio Declaration, (c) human rights law which requires nations to assure that their citizens enjoy human rights, and (d) many other legal theories including tort law.

California environmental goals include reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 40 % from 1990 levels by 2030 and by 80 % by 2050, as well as reducing nitrogen oxides (NOx) and other health - harming pollutants in areas of the state with the highest levels of air pollution by 2032.

And, true to label, a Green Climate Fund supported by Australia and 42 mostly developed countries will redistribute $ US100 billion ($ 128bn) annually to poorer nations as reparation for the unspecified environmental harm the West has allegedly caused them.

It is equally imperative that we do not destroy the environment we are trying to save by rushing to develop low - emissions energy sources that will result in serious environmental harm, as well as high economic and societal costs.

Curry dismisses this attempt to re-define «conflict of interest» as almost solely referring to financial support from business interests that would be harmed by environmental regulations.

In environmental matters, small is indeed beautiful as there is definitely a correlation between the amount of stuff used and environmental harm — even if considerable effort is made to do the right thing.

No Religious Path Advocates Environmental Destruction In other words, while there are differences in motivation for environmental protection between a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Jew, and a Christian — the first two generally seeing humanity as a integral part of nature, the latter two likely seeing the man's relationship to the natural world through the eyes of a caretaker — none of that matters when it comes to the need to preserve our water, our air, our land in an unpolluted state, in growing healthy food in a way that doesn't harm the lanEnvironmental Destruction In other words, while there are differences in motivation for environmental protection between a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Jew, and a Christian — the first two generally seeing humanity as a integral part of nature, the latter two likely seeing the man's relationship to the natural world through the eyes of a caretaker — none of that matters when it comes to the need to preserve our water, our air, our land in an unpolluted state, in growing healthy food in a way that doesn't harm the lanenvironmental protection between a Hindu, a Buddhist, a Jew, and a Christian — the first two generally seeing humanity as a integral part of nature, the latter two likely seeing the man's relationship to the natural world through the eyes of a caretaker — none of that matters when it comes to the need to preserve our water, our air, our land in an unpolluted state, in growing healthy food in a way that doesn't harm the land, et cetera.

Time to Scrap «Sacrifice» The idea seems so obvious, but it still often seems as if environmental campaigns focus on harms rather than happiness.

Second, we argue for the primacy of urbanization as a driver of change in demographics, resource consumption, and ideation and, in turn, develop a qualitative model of how changes in those factors drive environmental impacts, harming and then potentially helping nature in a broadly predictable way.

For four years now we've been following Patagonia Footwear as they strive to apply their business mantra of «Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis» to the art of shoemaking.

For four years now we've been following Patagonia Footwear as they strive to apply their business mantra of «Build the best product, cause no unnecessary harm, use business to inspire and implement solutions to the environmental crisis» to the art of

To accomplish this goal, the GCF must: explicitly exclude dirty energy — such as fossil fuels, carbon capture and storage and destructive dams — from GCF financing; ensure implementation of robust environmental and social safeguards; and, at minimum, guarantee that GCF - financed activities do no harm.

Developing technologies that will allow economic growth to continue without causing environmental harm will be necessary as long as this «iron law» holds true.

Costa Rica v. Nicaragua (Certain Activities Carried Out By Nicaragua in the Border Area)(Reparation Phase): instructed as junior counsel to Costa Rica in claim for reparation before International Court of Justice arising from, inter alia, environmental harm caused by breach of international obligations by Nicaragua.

Interestingly, our colleagues at the Environmental Law Alliance Worldwide have identified Ecuador as a country with laws that might support a lawsuit against private companies for climate - related harm.

Her practice is focused on advising States in investor - State arbitrations and State - to - State disputes concerning mineral resources, environmental harm, territorial and maritime claims, as well as human rights.

Nature sometimes provides input through a normal and necessary environmental event, such as a flood or volcanic eruption, but human decisions have put people and property in harm's way without adequate measures to deal with the environment.

For over 20 years, they have been seeking legal accountability as well as financial and environmental reparation for harms they allegedly have suffered due to Texaco's former operations in the region.

The notion of «environmental harm» is widely defined, with people and culture being recognised as an integral part of «environment» under the legislation and, although it has not been judicially tested, could foreseeably encompass the emission of greenhouse gases and consequential climate change.