I suppose it will surprise no one that I will vote based on the energy and
environmental policies of the parties.
Not exact matches
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in such forward - looking statements and that should be considered in evaluating our outlook include, but are not limited to, the following: 1) our ability to continue to grow our business and execute our growth strategy, including the timing, execution, and profitability
of new and maturing programs; 2) our ability to perform our obligations under our new and maturing commercial, business aircraft, and military development programs, and the related recurring production; 3) our ability to accurately estimate and manage performance, cost, and revenue under our contracts, including our ability to achieve certain cost reductions with respect to the B787 program; 4) margin pressures and the potential for additional forward losses on new and maturing programs; 5) our ability to accommodate, and the cost
of accommodating, announced increases in the build rates
of certain aircraft; 6) the effect on aircraft demand and build rates
of changing customer preferences for business aircraft, including the effect
of global economic conditions on the business aircraft market and expanding conflicts or political unrest in the Middle East or Asia; 7) customer cancellations or deferrals as a result
of global economic uncertainty or otherwise; 8) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which we operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates; 9) the success and timely execution
of key milestones such as the receipt
of necessary regulatory approvals, including our ability to obtain in a timely fashion any required regulatory or other third
party approvals for the consummation
of our announced acquisition
of Asco, and customer adherence to their announced schedules; 10) our ability to successfully negotiate, or re-negotiate, future pricing under our supply agreements with Boeing and our other customers; 11) our ability to enter into profitable supply arrangements with additional customers; 12) the ability
of all
parties to satisfy their performance requirements under existing supply contracts with our two major customers, Boeing and Airbus, and other customers, and the risk
of nonpayment by such customers; 13) any adverse impact on Boeing's and Airbus» production
of aircraft resulting from cancellations, deferrals, or reduced orders by their customers or from labor disputes, domestic or international hostilities, or acts
of terrorism; 14) any adverse impact on the demand for air travel or our operations from the outbreak
of diseases or epidemic or pandemic outbreaks; 15) our ability to avoid or recover from cyber-based or other security attacks, information technology failures, or other disruptions; 16) returns on pension plan assets and the impact
of future discount rate changes on pension obligations; 17) our ability to borrow additional funds or refinance debt, including our ability to obtain the debt to finance the purchase price for our announced acquisition
of Asco on favorable terms or at all; 18) competition from commercial aerospace original equipment manufacturers and other aerostructures suppliers; 19) the effect
of governmental laws, such as U.S. export control laws and U.S. and foreign anti-bribery laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the United Kingdom Bribery Act, and
environmental laws and agency regulations, both in the U.S. and abroad; 20) the effect
of changes in tax law, such as the effect
of The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the «TCJA») that was enacted on December 22, 2017, and changes to the interpretations
of or guidance related thereto, and the Company's ability to accurately calculate and estimate the effect
of such changes; 21) any reduction in our credit ratings; 22) our dependence on our suppliers, as well as the cost and availability
of raw materials and purchased components; 23) our ability to recruit and retain a critical mass
of highly - skilled employees and our relationships with the unions representing many
of our employees; 24) spending by the U.S. and other governments on defense; 25) the possibility that our cash flows and our credit facility may not be adequate for our additional capital needs or for payment
of interest on, and principal
of, our indebtedness; 26) our exposure under our revolving credit facility to higher interest payments should interest rates increase substantially; 27) the effectiveness
of any interest rate hedging programs; 28) the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting; 29) the outcome or impact
of ongoing or future litigation, claims, and regulatory actions; 30) exposure to potential product liability and warranty claims; 31) our ability to effectively assess, manage and integrate acquisitions that we pursue, including our ability to successfully integrate the Asco business and generate synergies and other cost savings; 32) our ability to consummate our announced acquisition
of Asco in a timely matter while avoiding any unexpected costs, charges, expenses, adverse changes to business relationships and other business disruptions for ourselves and Asco as a result
of the acquisition; 33) our ability to continue selling certain receivables through our supplier financing program; 34) the risks
of doing business internationally, including fluctuations in foreign current exchange rates, impositions
of tariffs or embargoes, compliance with foreign laws, and domestic and foreign government
policies; and 35) our ability to complete the proposed accelerated stock repurchase plan, among other things.
Such risks, uncertainties and other factors include, without limitation: (1) the effect
of economic conditions in the industries and markets in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate in the U.S. and globally and any changes therein, including financial market conditions, fluctuations in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, levels
of end market demand in construction and in both the commercial and defense segments
of the aerospace industry, levels
of air travel, financial condition
of commercial airlines, the impact
of weather conditions and natural disasters and the financial condition
of our customers and suppliers; (2) challenges in the development, production, delivery, support, performance and realization
of the anticipated benefits
of advanced technologies and new products and services; (3) the scope, nature, impact or timing
of acquisition and divestiture or restructuring activity, including the pending acquisition
of Rockwell Collins, including among other things integration
of acquired businesses into United Technologies» existing businesses and realization
of synergies and opportunities for growth and innovation; (4) future timing and levels
of indebtedness, including indebtedness expected to be incurred by United Technologies in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition, and capital spending and research and development spending, including in connection with the pending Rockwell Collins acquisition; (5) future availability
of credit and factors that may affect such availability, including credit market conditions and our capital structure; (6) the timing and scope
of future repurchases
of United Technologies» common stock, which may be suspended at any time due to various factors, including market conditions and the level
of other investing activities and uses
of cash, including in connection with the proposed acquisition
of Rockwell; (7) delays and disruption in delivery
of materials and services from suppliers; (8) company and customer - directed cost reduction efforts and restructuring costs and savings and other consequences thereof; (9) new business and investment opportunities; (10) our ability to realize the intended benefits
of organizational changes; (11) the anticipated benefits
of diversification and balance
of operations across product lines, regions and industries; (12) the outcome
of legal proceedings, investigations and other contingencies; (13) pension plan assumptions and future contributions; (14) the impact
of the negotiation
of collective bargaining agreements and labor disputes; (15) the effect
of changes in political conditions in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate, including the effect
of changes in U.S. trade
policies or the U.K.'s pending withdrawal from the EU, on general market conditions, global trade
policies and currency exchange rates in the near term and beyond; (16) the effect
of changes in tax (including U.S. tax reform enacted on December 22, 2017, which is commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
of 2017),
environmental, regulatory (including among other things import / export) and other laws and regulations in the U.S. and other countries in which United Technologies and Rockwell Collins operate; (17) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins to receive the required regulatory approvals (and the risk that such approvals may result in the imposition
of conditions that could adversely affect the combined company or the expected benefits
of the merger) and to satisfy the other conditions to the closing
of the pending acquisition on a timely basis or at all; (18) the occurrence
of events that may give rise to a right
of one or both
of United Technologies or Rockwell Collins to terminate the merger agreement, including in circumstances that might require Rockwell Collins to pay a termination fee
of $ 695 million to United Technologies or $ 50 million
of expense reimbursement; (19) negative effects
of the announcement or the completion
of the merger on the market price
of United Technologies» and / or Rockwell Collins» common stock and / or on their respective financial performance; (20) risks related to Rockwell Collins and United Technologies being restricted in their operation
of their businesses while the merger agreement is in effect; (21) risks relating to the value
of the United Technologies» shares to be issued in connection with the pending Rockwell acquisition, significant merger costs and / or unknown liabilities; (22) risks associated with third
party contracts containing consent and / or other provisions that may be triggered by the Rockwell merger agreement; (23) risks associated with merger - related litigation or appraisal proceedings; and (24) the ability
of United Technologies and Rockwell Collins, or the combined company, to retain and hire key personnel.
In Halifax the
party adopted
policy recommendations that include universal pharmacare, a guaranteed minimum income, an
environmental bill
of rights, and an employee pension protection strategy.
Rick is a former Chief
of Staff for the federal New Democratic
Party, and has led many successful campaigns for important new public
policies at the federal and provincial levels related to
environmental and consumer protection, urban planning, green jobs creation, democratic reform and progressive taxation.
As such, those
parties stressing the economy first and foremost will attempt to maintain the perception that stronger
environmental policies will place the livelihood
of Canadians at risk.
The Green
Party has nominated
Environmental Economics and
Policy student Andrew Fehr, who faces the challenge
of convincing Green - leaning voters that actually voting for a Green
Party is a better choice than a strategic vote for Ms. Duncan.
In
environmental policy, the
Party promises stronger greenhouse gas emission regulations and enforcement in the oil - patch; a water management plan to ensure that current and future needs are balanced; a moratorium on additional resource development on lakeshores and lake beds; a Green Energy Plan to support green energy projects and move the province away from coalpower; and a land - use framework that curbs urban sprawl and safeguards farmland and habitats in the vicinity
of cities.
The
Party justifies its
policies on the basis that they are the scientifically correct means to achieve both the main objective
of self - strengthening, and the subordinate goals identified by the
Party: economic growth, technological development, social and political stability and
environmental protection (to some extent).
It has often been viewed as a «single issue» environmentalist
party, but while it still maintains its
environmental policies and political ecology, it also has a history
of support for communitarian economic
policies, including well - funded, locally controlled public services within the confines
of a steady state economy, and it supports proportional representation.
The call from Joan Walley, who chairs the Commons»
environmental audit committee, comes as the opposition
party draws up its
policy on green issues ahead
of next year's general election.
Church
of the Militant Elvis PartyEstablished by David Bishop (nicknamed Lord Biro) in 2001, this
party actually has serious
environmental policies on corporate power and rainforest destruction.
During the European parliamentary campaign
of 2014
party Co-President András Schiffer described LMP as having a pronounced pro-integration position on
environmental, wage and labour
policy however, as supporting member state autonomy on the self - determination
of local communities concerning land resources.
[18] According to the Legislative Gazette, Killian represented a more centrist wing
of the Republican
Party; she has called for more restrictions on firearms and
environmental protection
policies.
Current polls show Harper's Conservative
Party lagging behind the Liberals, who have pledged to undo many
of the prime minister's energy and
environmental policies and to push for a «pan-Canadian framework» for combating climate change.
The plan, released yesterday after 14 months
of deliberation, delivers on an election promise made by Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's Liberal
Party to revisit controversial changes made to Canada's
environmental policies by the previous Conservative
Party government, led by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.
Trudeau has also said his
party will embrace «evidence based
policy» and «data - driven decision - making,» do more to address climate change, protect endangered species, and review the
environmental impact
of major energy and development projects.»
That result shook the two largest political
parties out
of their torpor on
environmental policy.
The
environmental example noted that, with the assistance of the U.S. Institute for Environmental Conflict Resolution, a Federal agency created to assist parties in resolving environmental conflicts around the country that involve Federal agencies or interests, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is working on developing an ADR system that would be applied during the National Environmental Policy Act (N
environmental example noted that, with the assistance
of the U.S. Institute for
Environmental Conflict Resolution, a Federal agency created to assist parties in resolving environmental conflicts around the country that involve Federal agencies or interests, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is working on developing an ADR system that would be applied during the National Environmental Policy Act (N
Environmental Conflict Resolution, a Federal agency created to assist
parties in resolving
environmental conflicts around the country that involve Federal agencies or interests, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is working on developing an ADR system that would be applied during the National Environmental Policy Act (N
environmental conflicts around the country that involve Federal agencies or interests, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is working on developing an ADR system that would be applied during the National
Environmental Policy Act (N
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process.
For the moment, the two corporate camps — which have dominated the discussion, with
environmental groups largely locked out — have turned to Congress, where an array
of influential members from both
parties is hoping to seize the initiative in
policy making.
She also collaborated with a range
of groups in the non-partisan «Vote for the Environment» campaign to develop and promote a charter
of environmental policies to all political
parties involved in each
of New Zealand's general elections.
A centrepiece
of his Liberal
Party's
environmental policy is to scrap Australia's carbon tax and stop its planned integration into the EU ETS.
Welcomes the agreement achieved by the Ad Hoc Working Group on Further Commitments for Annex I
Parties under the Kyoto Protocol on its work pursuant to decisions 1 / CMP.1, 1 / CMP.5 and 1 / CMP.6 in the areas
of land use, land - use change and forestry (decision - / CMP.7), emissions trading and the project - based mechanisms (decision - / CMP.7), greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories, common metrics to calculate the carbon dioxide equivalence
of anthropogenic emissions by sources and removals by sinks, and other methodological issues (decision - / CMP.7) and the consideration
of information on potential
environmental, economic and social consequences, including spillover effects,
of tools,
policies, measures and methodologies available to Annex I
Parties (decision - / CMP.7);
The coalition, which included the FCNL, Evangelical
Environmental Network (EEN),
Environmental Defense Action Fund, and Citizens» Climate Lobby, among others, has been meeting discreetly with moderate House and Senate members
of both
parties in the hopes
of defusing the partisan vitriol that clings to the climate issue and eventually forging
policy.
The resolution begins by saying «it is a conservative principle to protect, conserve, and be good stewards
of our environment,» perhaps marking the discomfort that some Republicans feel about their
party's positions on
environmental policies.
The key feature
of this type
of policy is the provision
of long - term protection against identified
environmental risks as well as unknown sudden, accidental, gradual and historical pollution liabilities that have not been identified by the
parties during an M&A transaction.
Tribal Relations One
of the key factors influencing
environmental law and
policy in the Pacific Northwest is the presence
of and obligations owed to a number
of tribes that are
parties to treaties with the United States that extend back to the 1850s.
These are commonly the preliminary documents I ask to check off, reserving the right to seek additional information: ● The most recent title commitment or
policy and all related documents ● The most recent ALTA survey and topographic study for the property ● Copies
of all blueprints and as - built drawings ● The Zoning Compliance Certificate and all zoning approvals, variances and pending applications ● Declaration
of covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations and easements ● Any third -
party engineering and
environmental reports, including, but not limited to Phase I and Phase II reports, mold abatement reports and underground storage tank testing and closure reports, NFR letters, appraisals, With Texas being the top state in the US for contributions to state gross domestic product and jobs created / supported by commercial real estate development, how do you recommend the legal sector should change in order to support this growth?
That same superior knowledge
of environmental law and
policy enables our litigators to effectively represent buyers or sellers
of property in disputes over
environmental liabilities associated with those properties;
parties targeted for cleanup costs and natural resource damages in Superfund cases; and private
parties in litigation over contribution or allocation issues.
And to put a #VicVotes perspective on the health impacts
of climate change, Dr Jo McCubbin argued that neither
of the major
parties had made any thoughtful
environmental policy statements, and medical student Tim Martin wrote that «Running for election without a plan to shut down coal - fired power stations when there are viable clean alternatives isn't just negligent, it's madness.»