There is good reason to think that the fatal flaw of the indicated argumentation for
epistemic relativism lies in its failure to give due heed to the dialectic of process and product — and in particular the distinction between instances of the production of information and the items of information that are produced.
The main conclusion that is commonly drawn from the fact of historicity is
epistemic relativism.
The project of natural theology, seeking what can be known of God by the light of reason alone, was abandoned and left for dead by many scholars in mid-century, assumed to be a victim of either positivism or
epistemic relativism.
Not exact matches
Hence, with the spread of postmodern
relativism, secular scholars today are «up a creek without an
epistemic paddle.»