Sentences with phrase «epistemological questions of»

Much of my early research and writing were preoccupied with epistemological questions of faith.

«With Heidegger's philosophy, we are always engaged in going back to the foundations, but we are left incapable of beginning the movement of return that would lead from the fundamental ontology to the properly epistemological question of the status of the human sciences.»

[13] Additionally, it is important to note that he lived in a period where faith was cast into the background of the epistemological question of «What can one know?»

The questions we have treated in this book (such as whether nature has purpose; whether biology is reducible to physics and chemistry; whether and how chance comes into play in the cosmos; and now the epistemological question of how science relates to religion) revolve around the issue of whether our universe is one - dimensional or hierarchical.

Not exact matches

The Foucault by whom we are first moved to question modernity, the Foucault by whom we are first shown the absurdity of the modern project from its beginning, is not the Foucault of the epistemological Order of Things and Archaeology of Knowledge, but the Foucault of the historical Discipline and Punish, Madness and Civilization, and Birth of the Clinic.

Let me first of all elaborate on this epistemological standpoint by dealing with the question of whether there can be development or innovation in religious beliefs and in their transmission.

Brightman's reasoning is from the «inside out» (empirical) in both cases; in this regard he calls himself an «empiricist of consciousness, 48 which also explains his willingness, evidently motivated by a fondness for his method, to collapse epistemological and metaphysical questions.

This is where Hartshorne could, and in some implicit ways does, drive a wedge in Brightman's view, because Brightman is willing as a point of method to collapse metaphysical questions into epistemological questions.29 Hartshorne is not so willing, and thinks personalism must employ both inductive (empirical) and transcendental argumentation to support its own claims.

Brightman seems to recognize that this is a stretch for him, for when he asks of himself the same question after his correspondence with Hartshorne has ceased, Brightman expresses epistemological diffidence, counterbalanced only by a peculiar attitude of Scriptural faith:

The question this leaves is whether this epistemological dispute places Hartshorne outside of personalism in any important way.

At the heart of Luther's theology of the cross is a profoundly epistemological question: the question about knowledge of God.

So, Collingwood takes the counteroffensive: from now on he concentrates on the question of a transcendental - epistemological justification of metaphysics.

Yet, now an answer to the epistemological side of this question is also available (or at least a perspective on it).

I have to recast the question a bit in order not to mix epistemological issues (i.e., how does continuity affect our process of knowing what is?)

Barth, because he makes an attempt»... to answer the methodological and historical problems raised by the nineteenth century by foreclosing all discussion of epistemological questions and insisting that the subjectivity of Jesus Christ, the God - man, is the only important reality confronting the mind of man.»

Indeed, even if one begins with broadly epistemological considerations, as I have done here, one can only avoid asking and answering the question wherein the ontic correlate of such a noetic pole consists by a failure to be fully critical in taking account of what one always already presupposes.

Once the epistemological center of gravity has shifted to a place outside of the self, questions about communal ideals and questions about knowledge and truth are, though not identical to each other, ineluctably convergent.

The epistemological question is: What is the relation of symbols to reality?

Although the two books differ from one another in several important respects, they both concern themselves centrally with epistemological matters, and they converge from strikingly different directions upon the question of community.

Two basic questions, one ontological and the other epistemological, must be dealt with before the relation of faith and reason can be properly addressed.

Hence, the ontological and epistemological questions converge in the concept of participation or what Dorothy Emmet calls «rapport.»

Of the three basic human questions posed above, the epistemological question (What or how can we know?)

Philosophy and theology might make an important contribution to this fundamentally epistemological question by, for example, helping the empirical sciences to recognize a difference between... evolution as the origin of a succession in space and time, and creation as the ultimate origin of participated being in essential Being.»

Whitehead is not asserting an epistemological solipsism here, but is stating that the question of the community of nature to all, being metaphysical, is not one that has to be answered from the point of view of science.3 Moreover, it remains to be seen whether or not Whitehead's position, as it unfolds in the Enquiry, will remain uninvolved in the «difficult metaphysical question.»

Placher's answer to my question about the relative truth or falsity of religious claims touches upon my comment that current forms of epistemological relativism provide a justification for affirming the truth of beliefs without worrying about whether they are true for more than those who affirm them.

In question time he refined this to say that it was only the specific epistemological capabilities of the human being that proved that our holistic formality was immaterial.

The mechanics of your question are somewhat nonsensical at face, but giving an honest treatment to your phrasing of»... human right to health care» above (I understand that you did not phrase it within the epistemological framework of methodological individualism, so I want to treat your words fairly) the only way in which this phrase can make any sense at all without introducing a crime is:

Today the academy's mandate involves promoting the progress of mathematical, physical, and natural sciences and participating in the study of related epistemological questions and issues.

Indeed, our epistemological beliefs are thought to influence the questions we ask, the sources of information we place trust in, the certainty of our beliefs, and even academic outcomes (Greene, Sandoval, & Bråten, 2016).

Only instead of an epistemological question, formalism here becomes an entirely practical question about art and illusion: however is that done?

Elana Adler is an interdisciplinary artist whose work primarily focuses on questions of perception, signaling, and existence from both epistemological and ontological ways of thinking.

The greater epistemological challenge is the impossible question of judgment without the help of hindsight: If these works were presented at the front desk of a Chelsea gallery today, would the artist get a shot, or be shown the door?

Gala Porras - Kim makes work that questions how knowledge is acquired, tests the potential of the art object to function as an epistemological tool outside of its traditional, art historical context, and challenges the possibilities and limits of learning about the cultures that surround us.

This raises the question of what epistemological status it can claim.

From the ontological and epistemological questions about the nature of truth to the simply mechanical objection that «the whole truth» can not be told, I can't help feel that I'm missing a key element of the legal view of this.