Sentences with phrase «equal amounts of radiation»

They will explain clearly the derivation of equation 7, the relationship between flux and kinetic energy and how two objects at different temperatures can exchange equal amounts of radiation.

However, if you claim that bodies at different temperatures exchange equal amounts of radiation due to Kirchhoff you are claiming that you have overturned basic thermodynamics.

If Miskolczi has proven that two bodies at different temperatures exchange equal amounts of radiation then this is a thermodynamic revolution.

The problem is that even if radiation is absorbed, lets say in the lower troposphere by water vapor, an equal amount of radiation will be emitted by water vapor in the same band.

Not exact matches

Even if ocean surface temperatures fall as in (3), heat continues to accumulate in the earth system until the amount of outgoing radiation at the top of atmosphere equals the amount of incoming radiation there.

(To illustrate scattering, through in some mirror - balls and prisms) At any one wavelength The amount of radiation (at that frequency) coming from a direction is equal to the «color» you see.

I agree with Maxwell's point that at equilibrium two bodies they exchange equal amounts of thermal radiation with each other.

Because the climate system derives virtually all its energy from the Sun, zero balance implies that, globally, the amount of incoming solar radiation on average must be equal to the sum of the outgoing reflected solar radiation and the outgoing thermal infrared radiation emitted by the climate system.

I accept the idea that for a system surrounded by a vacuum when radiation - rate - equilibrium is reached, the amount of energy per unit time leaving a system via radiation is equal to the amount of energy per unit time entering the system.

Assume a fixed rate of energy per unit time is being absorbed by and / or generated within an object; and at temperature T the object is in «heat transfer» equilbrium — i.e., the amount of outgoing energy per unit time is equal to the incoming radiation per unit time.

It will not rise at all if the absorption is balanced by an equal amount of emission (as would occur if its emissivity would be increased from a change in its molecular composition — e.g. the formation of ozone from UV radiation or mixing a little CO2 within it).

This is the amount of extra energy the Earth would radiate back into space (all else being equal) if the temperature were raised 1 °C, simply because hotter objects give off more radiation.

Since IR radiation is a finite amount equal to the short wave energy reaching the earth, how much CO2 does it take to absorb / intercept / deplete all the IR in the narrow bands representing 15 - 20 % of the spectrum.

If we hold everything else equal and double the amount of N2 in the atmosphere, because N2 does not participate in the back radiation, the surface equilibrium temperature should remain «unchanged» according to the radiative transfer model.

In Part Two we looked at the claim that the surface and atmosphere exchanged exactly equal amounts of energy by radiation.

This subsequently causes the Earth to COOL by an amount EXACTLY equal to the energy contained in that packet of emitted IR radiation.