Sentences with phrase «equal protection of»

the unique nature of native title means that equal protection of native title interests will sometimes require native title to be treated differently to non-Indigenous interest; and

The rights which persons belonging to minorities enjoy under Article 27 of the Covenant in respect of their language, culture and religion do not authorise any State, group or person to violate the right to the equal enjoyment by women of any Covenant rights, including the right to equal protection of the law.

And such a committee can not be easily persuaded that the right of Indigenous titleholders to equal protection of their title by the law should be compromised in order to achieve certainty for other stakeholders.

Under these instruments Australia is required to protect the right to equality, including equal protection of property interests, without distinction as to race, colour or ethnic origin.

The right to equality: A non-discriminatory approach to development requires that Indigenous people enjoy equal protection of their property interests before the law.

Indigenous peoples like other self - determining peoples should have control of resources on their land and enjoy equal protection of their property interests before the law.

equal protection of property interests before the law; as required by the International Convention against the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (ICERD), Article 5 and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), Article 17.

Recommendations by the Inquiry ensure the equal protection of Indigenous rights and interests by maintaining the operation of all procedural rights under the NTA in any recommendations affecting the administrative process of native title and mineral tenements.

In order to achieve equality and equal protection of property interests, while also taking account of the specific cultural identity of the group or individual concerned, may require the government to adopt measures that treat the particular group differently.

Registration is substantial proof of a significant interest in land (albeit not a final determination of common law recognition of native title) that is required to be protected because of the right to equal protection of property rights

2.1 The right to equality before the law - including equal protection of property interests before the law.

To achieve the necessary equal protection of Indigenous property rights, differential treatment of such rights is required.

Australia is required, under ICERD, to protect the right to equality, including equal protection of property interests, without distinction as to race, colour or ethnic origin.

(1) With the intent to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws or for the purpose of preventing the constituted authorities of this state or any subdivision thereof from, or hindering them in, giving or securing to all persons within this state the equal protection of the laws;

In the case of missing and murdered Aboriginal women, entitlement to equal protection of the law without discrimination is relevant.

This is governed by human rights codes and employment standards laws, both subject to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, which guarantees equal protection of law regardless of national origin etc..

In what is often viewed as its most important decision of the twentieth century, Chief Justice Warren wrote for a unanimous US Supreme Court: «segregation is a denial of the equal protection of the laws»; and «to separate [some children] from others of similar age and qualifications solely because of their race generates a feeling of inferiority as to their status in the community that may affect their hearts and minds in a way unlikely ever to be undone.»

(1) Everyone has the right to equality before the law and to equal protection of the law without discrimination because of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, religion, age or sex.

Defense counsel moved to discharge the jury on the ground that the prosecutor's removal of the black veniremen violated petitioner's rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to a jury drawn from a cross-section of the community, and under the Fourteenth Amendment to equal protection of the laws.

Defense counsel moved to discharge the jury before it was sworn on the ground that the prosecutor's removal of the black veniremen violated petitioner's rights under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to a jury drawn from a cross-section of the community, and under the Fourteenth Amendment to equal protection of the laws.

In essence, while the repeal of net neutrality will erode the constitutional right of free speech enshrined in the 1st Amendment, the proposal to privatize regulation, if implemented, would erode the constitutional right of equal protection of the law enshrined in the 14th Amendment.

``... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»

No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

The Intervenor was established by people with disabilities to create a voice for disabled Canadians and to promote the full participation and equal opportunity and equal protection of the law for people with disabilities in Canadian society.

Accordingly, this Court should ensure the victims in this case receive the equal protection of the law.

As Justice Stevens wrote in Bray, «the demonstrations in the 1960's were motivated by a desire to extend the equal protection of the laws to all classes — not to impose burdens on any disadvantaged class....

Just days later, the American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Louisiana sued, arguing that this violates defendants» Sixth Amendment right to counsel and 14th Amendment right to due process and equal protection of the laws.

Discrimination: The denial of equal protection of the laws; the failure to treat all people alike despite differences in race, color, creed, sex, or social position.

State support of segregated schools through any arrangement, management, funds, or property can not be squared with the Amendment's command that no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.

As such, the courts guarantee aliens the right to due process of law and equal protection of the laws.

«We are here to protect survivors» right to fair treatment by the courts and equal protection of the law.

In their famous essay «The Equal Protection of the Laws», the authors provided the intellectual building blocks for rational legal thought about legislative «classifications».

XIV § 1 prohibits States from denying any person within its jurisdiction «equal protection of the laws.»

The most basic relevant principle is the Equal Protection Clause, which forbids a state from denying a person the equal protection of its laws.

Only recently, this Court had occasion to declare that a state law which denied equal enjoyment of property rights to a designated class of citizens of specified race and ancestry was not a legitimate exercise of the state's police power, but violated the guaranty of the equal protection of the laws.

Alternative structures and ending the lawyer monopoly on legal services are fundamentally about access to justice and equal protection of the law.

«Every person within the jurisdiction enjoys the equal protection of our laws.

Such egregious statements by a sitting judge have broad repercussions, threatening survivors» access to the equal protection of the law and undermining women's equality, as well as the public's trust in our justice system.

The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the Civil War.

And now, in going back and doing it again, they are still using the public trust argument but also, explicitly, the idea of equal protection of the law and due process, that young people are being deprived of life, liberty, and property.

• «All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law.»

Further, to consider a specific example, the United States Constitution provides all citizens «equal protection of the laws» and states that no person can be deprived of «life, liberty or property without due process of law».

The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction «the equal protection of the laws.»

Our new case in the U.S. District Court in Oregon (Juliana et al v. United States) puts comparable emphasis on the «Atmospheric Trust» concept developed by Mary Wood and «Equal Rights» concept in the «Equal Protection of the Laws» and «Due Process» clauses of the U.S. Constitution.

The 5th and 14th Amendments together assure equal protection of the laws and due process, people should not be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law.

Since ample evidence exists to establish a rational relationship between the city's classification of certain dogs as pit bulls, and since there is a legitimate governmental purpose of protecting the health and safety of the city's residents and dogs, the trial court correctly concluded that the ordinance did not violate the dog owners» right to equal protection of the laws.â $

(4) serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to denials of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion or national origin, including but not limited to the fields of voting, education, housing, employment, the use of public facilities, and transportation, or in the administration of justice;

Whenever an action has been commenced in any court of the United States seeking relief from the denial of equal protection of the laws under the fourteenth amendment to the Constitution on account of race, color, religion, or national origin, the Attorney General for or in the name of the United States may intervene in such action upon timely application if the Attorney General certifies that the case is of general public importance.

(3) appraise the laws and policies of the Federal Government with respect to denials of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion or national origin or in the administration of justice;

(1) signed by a parent or group of parents to the effect that his or their minor children, as members of a class of persons similarly situated, are being deprived by a school board of the equal protection of the laws, or