Sentences with phrase «equal protection within»
This resulted in not only equal rights but also equal protection within the marriage union.
https://www.marriage.com/ Not exact matches
(As the Fourteenth Amendment says, «nor shall any State... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»)
Constitutional Amendment 14 (this one specifically applies to Pan's Bill): ``... No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»
Instead, Judge Roger Miner ruled that the prohibition violated the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause («No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws&raqEqual Protection Clause («No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the lawProtection Clause («No State shall... deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws&raqequal protection of the lawprotection of the laws»).
«With the conceded disparate funding, compounded by the fact that taxpayers within the poorer school districts end up subsidizing, at least in part, the tax credits granted to taxpayers within the wealthier districts, I find that plaintiffs have stated a viable equal protection claim,» Lynch wrote.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The idea is radical but simple: to include the nonhuman great apes within the community of equals by granting them the basic moral and legal protection that only human beings currently enjoy.
It could find that the equal protection clause prohibits wide within - state disparities in educational opportunity that disadvantage some students because they live in a property - poor district, as Justice Thurgood Marshall argued in his Rodriguez dissent.
Many people believe that the federal government ought to play a strong role to make good on the promise of the Fourteenth Amendment, that the government shall not «deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»
This might seem to preclude any federal oversight of education, except that the 14th Amendment requires all states to provide «any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»
In 1954, the Supreme Court in its landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision ruled that separate school facilities based on race are inherently unequal and thus in violation of the 14th Amendment which states, in part: «No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»
The Equal Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction «the equal protection of the laws.&rEqual Protection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction «the equal protection of the laProtection Clause, part of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, which took effect in 1868, provides that no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction «the equal protection of the laws.&requal protection of the laprotection of the laws.»
As I mentioned in the previous post, I believe that this state of affairs largely arises from the deep history of protection of confidentiality within the legal profession and the mistaken notion that protection of confidentiality equals protection of privacy and ensures compliance with the relevant legal requirements that surround the protection of privacy and use of information.
«Every person within the jurisdiction enjoys the equal protection of our laws.
XIV § 1 prohibits States from denying any person within its jurisdiction «equal protection of the laws.»
State support of segregated schools through any arrangement, management, funds, or property can not be squared with the Amendment's command that no State shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Thirdly, appellants contend that this same statutory provision, Art. 27, § 509, violates the «Equal Protection» Clause because it permits only certain merchants within Anne Arundel County (operators of bathing beaches and amusement parks et cetera) to sell merchandise customarily sold at these places while forbidding its sale by other vendors of this merchandise, such as appellants» employer.
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
``... nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.»
(1) With the intent to deprive any person or class of persons of the equal protection of the laws or of equal privileges and immunities under the laws or for the purpose of preventing the constituted authorities of this state or any subdivision thereof from, or hindering them in, giving or securing to all persons within this state the equal protection of the laws;