Not exact matches
Shared
parenting refers to a joint custody
arrangement where both
parents share approximately
equal parenting time.
In true «joint custody»
arrangements,
parents share equal «legal custody» and «physical custody» rights.
Says Wasser: «If you are hoping to eventually get to an
equal time
share arrangement but have not historically spent as much time
parenting, gradual increases are recommended.»
Our custody and
parenting arrangement lawyers led by Lorne N. MacLean, QC, have noticed how custody and
parenting arrangements have progressed over time moving from the one primary
parent theory in the 1970's to joint custody in the 1980's and 1990's but not necessarily
equal time to the now more common 50/50
shared parenting time regimes.
Physical custody, which means where children reside, may be an
equal and
shared physical custody
arrangement where a child's time is evenly split between two homes, or an
arrangement where the child resides with the primary custodial
parent and the visitation schedule allows for
parenting time with the non-custodial
parent.
In some cases, a
shared parenting arrangement gives both
parents an
equal amount of time with their kids.
There are a variety of ways to
share parenting time, but the guidelines calculate support differently if the
parents share equal time (meaning, the child lives with each
parent 50 % of the time), close to
equal time (where the child stays with the non-custodial
parent between 143 and 183 nights a year) or have a split custody
arrangement (where the
parents divide the kids between them — mom takes the older child while dad has the younger child, for example).
When
parents can not agree on
parenting arrangements judges are now commonly ordering
shared equal child
parenting arrangements.
Under a
shared custody
arrangement, the child does not necessarily spend an
equal amount of time with each
parent.
When both
parents share equal managing and possessory conservatorship the
arrangement is referred to as joint conservatorship.
FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both
parents seek sole parental responsibility and for the child to live with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the
arrangement if the court ordered for the child to spend no time with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make
parenting orders with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship with both
parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests for the presumption of
equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.
In joint legal custody
arrangements,
parents share equally in decision - making responsibility for a child but may not necessarily spend
equal amounts of time with them.
In a «
shared parenting»
arrangement, the parties
share legal custody of the minor child (ren); however, «
shared parenting»
arrangements do not always result in the
parents having
equal parenting time with the minor child (ren).
However, this will not necessarily result in an
arrangement where both
parents share equal time with their child 50 - 50.
A
shared physical custody
arrangement is rarely exactly 50/50, with the child living an
equal amount of time with each
parent.
In simplest of terms, joint physical custody is an
arrangement in which both
parents share equal rights in terms of time and contact with their children.
I remember Kris Titus, who was the president of the
Equal Parenting Council across Canada, an umbrella organization for 40 - some groups, telling me about when she and her ex, who were living in close communities, went to the judge the first time around to try to work out this kind of arrangement of approximately equal shared paren
Equal Parenting Council across Canada, an umbrella organization for 40 - some groups, telling me about when she and her ex, who were living in close communities, went to the judge the first time around to try to work out this kind of arrangement of approximately equal shared p
Parenting Council across Canada, an umbrella organization for 40 - some groups, telling me about when she and her ex, who were living in close communities, went to the judge the first time around to try to work out this kind of
arrangement of approximately
equal shared paren
equal shared parentingparenting.
Mr. Speaker, I am quite honoured to be introducing a private member's bill today which would direct the courts in regard to divorce to make
equal shared parenting the presumptive
arrangement in the best interests of the child, except in proven cases of abuse or neglect.
Mr. Speaker, I am quite honoured in these few moments to be introducing a private member's bill that would direct the courts in regard to divorce to make
equal shared parenting the presumptive
arrangement in the best interest of the child, except in proven cases of abuse or neglect.
Bill C - 560 would amend the Divorce Act to direct the courts to make
equal shared parenting the presumptive
arrangement for children following the divorce of their
parents, except in proven cases of abuse or neglect.
The amendments in Bill C - 560 would direct the courts in regard to divorce to make
equal shared parenting, and I will talk later of the range being 35 % to 50 % roughly, but making it the presumptive
arrangement in the best interests of the child, except in proven cases of abuse or neglect.
A physical custody
arrangement where
parents share equal parenting time will be ordered by a Kansas judge if
parents are in agreement with that
arrangement.
Between 1986 and 2008,
equal shared custody
arrangements increased from 5 % to 27 % of post-divorce
parenting arrangements.
If
parents share substantially
equal physical custody
arrangements, the relocating
parent can only relocate temporarily if the other
parent agrees in writing.