Sentences with phrase «equal shares unless»

«Unmarried couples buying a house together often don't have that discussion and they end up buying the house as «joint tenants», which means they will have been taken to have agreed to own the house in equal shares unless there is some very clear evidence that this was not the case.

Based on the parties» claims, the SCC calculates the advance on costs which is paid by the parties in equal shares unless otherwise stated in the arbitration agreement.

Not exact matches

Unless the participating employee has previously withdrawn from the offering, his or her accumulated payroll deductions will be used to purchase shares on the last business day of the offering period at a price equal to 85 % of the fair market value of the shares on the first business day or the last business day of the offering period, whichever is lower.

«Please do not tell girls or women that they share equally in God's image; that they are equal at the foot of the cross; that they are equal in the kingdom of God, that they should cultivate their minds equally, unless you are prepared to give them equal authority to use the gifts God has given them.

Businesses can not afford to ignore the parenting revolution that millennials want to see and the PM won't succeed in his vision of eliminating the gender pay gap unless we see a more equal sharing of parental duties as the new norm.

You could possibly get full custody of your children; however, Nevada family courts favor shared physical custody and are likely to grant each parent equal time with the children, unless the children are at risk of coming to harm in the presence of their other parent.

Unless the inventors unanimously agree otherwise, they all get equal shares.

Because Social Security and Medicare taxes aren't withheld from your tutoring earnings — unless you're a traditional employee — the self - employment tax equals the employee's and the employer's share of FICA taxes.

Given this consensus, all groups and individuals have a burden of demonstrating what justice would require of them in terms of emissions levels mindful that, as a starting point, all human beings should be entitled to equal per capita shares of safe emissions unless some higher level can be justified on moral grounds.

It is trite law that in considering making orders for financial provision, the district judge is charged with an inquiry into the size of the parties» resources and to identify factors which might justify a departure from equality of division of them — described by Sir Mark Potter P in Charman v Charman [2007] EWCA Civ 503, [2007] All ER (D) 425 (May) as the «sharing principle»: «Property should be shared in equal proportions unless there is good reason to depart from such proportions; departure is not from the principle but takes place within the principle.»

A general partnership assumes equal shares between the partners unless the Partnership Agreement states otherwise.

Baroness Hale put the matter beyond doubt... we take the «the sharing principle» [sic] to mean that property should be shared in equal proportions unless there is good reason to depart from such proportions.»

British Columbia's repealed Family Relations Act, for example, provided that spouses would each receive a one - half share of the family property, unless an equal division would be «unfair» considering a non-exhaustive list of six factors; its new Family Law Act prescribes an equal division unless an equal division would be «significantly unfair» upon consideration of an even longer non-exhaustive list of factors.

For example, the businessman buying life insurance on a business partner can only purchase insurance that equals an objective valuation of the business partner's share of the business, unless he can justify an additional amount.

One attorney recently in North Dakota in light of the introduction of Measure 6, (the equal shared parenting initiative that would have made the presumption that both fit parents have equal shared parenting unless proven unfit), made it clear that he too believes that children should be raised by both parents unless they are in clear and present danger.

The private member's bill, which Ludmer helped draft, called for changes to the Divorce Act, with the primary proposal being a rebuttable presumption that equal shared parenting would support the best interests of the children unless a parent can establish based on evidence that another parenting plan would substantially enhance those interests.

Equal time - sharing with a minor child by both parents is in the best interest of the child unless the court finds that: a.

Equal time - sharing with a minor child by both parents is in the best interest of the child unless the court finds that:

Bill C - 560 would require parents to co-operate in establishing equal shared parenting unless they can make a credible compelling case that this would not be in the best interest of the child.

Bill C - 560 would require parents to co-operate toward equal shared parenting unless they can make a credible compelling case that this would not be in the best interests of their children.

Bill C - 422, which was first introduced in June 2009, would instruct family law judges to automatically apply the principle of equal shared parenting unless it's not in the best interests of the children involved.

Married parents share equal parental rights over a child during the marriage and throughout separation unless a judge issues a court order to the contrary.

Married parents share equal parental rights over their child during a separation, unless a family court issues a child custody order to the contrary.

Adjoining landowners are presumed to share an equal benefit from any fence dividing their properties, and unless otherwise agreed in writing, are presumed to be equally responsible for the reasonable costs of construction, maintenance, or necessary replacement of the fence.