Saying «there has to be two
equal sides to every story» is how we end up with «alternative facts».
Not exact matches
I hope this site, after letting Julie share her perspective, will give
equal time
to Tony's
side of the
story.
Hurt
to see reflected through your combined thoughts, words that, much as I truly try, my blogs really don't give
equal Time
to all
sides of the
story (either)..
James Nesbitt shines amongst a cast that are all totally believable as both
sides of the
story are shown in
equal measure, both the victims of the atrocity and the unprepared military whose lack of training for such situations and indifferent command led
to a huge over reaction and tragedy.
Normal, hard, and lunatic are the opening offerings, and I made it through the
story on normal without much fuss (one mission required me
to balance two opposing
sides with
equal opposing fort domination, but the others were strictly about killing everything).
On this particular issue of climate change, the Times will have
to shift, in my view, from the normal journalistic paradigm (e.g., try
to give
equal coverage
to both «
sides» of a
story; communicate
stories in a muted way by avoiding most words that convey passion and weight; rotate the news so that even important topics only see the front page once in awhile; keep views
to the back pages; avoid upsetting big advertisers too much; and so forth)
to what might be called a «wisdom paradigm» (face problems, understand problems, communicate your views loudly and up front, address problems, and so forth).
What it will do is raise the prominence, credibility, and awareness of the skeptical
side's view
to that of being
equal with the academic
story tellers.
Although, deniers will tell me, it's just one
side of the
story & you did nt allow fossil fuel scientists or christian groups trying
to defeat the green dragon have their say &
equal input, for balance.